- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: J6 pipe bomb suspect identified. Full report linked.
Posted on 11/8/25 at 10:38 am to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 11/8/25 at 10:38 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Ray Epps…
0
Posted on 11/8/25 at 11:18 am to Vacherie Saint
Well said. Cuz.
Posted on 11/8/25 at 11:19 am to Bronco11
So, the gist here is that the alleged pipe bomb suspect was a former CHP officer who was at the time working for Radcliffe in the eff bee eye and likely neck deep in yet another colossal frame-job to make the Tangerine Tyrant look bad?
Ok, so I want to say something. To the Warrior Courts and mmmmmbeers and Never-Trumpers of the board who constantly tell us that Trump does a smash-up job of making himself look so bad all the time.... If that's the case, then why do we have undeniable proof of major "news" entities like ABXi, NBXi, XiNN, XiBS, MSDNC, Faux News, NYT, WaPo, BBC, etc. all selectively editing audio and video of Trump to paint him in a bad light? Why do we now have multiple instances of the eff bee eye and CHP being active participants in a false flag operation during and leading up to J6?
I'll say this, it seems redundant and counterintuitive to spend so much time, resources and energy into making Trump look bad, if he does that well enough on his own. No?
You know what though? If you just hate Trump for whatever reason, that's fine and that's your prerogative. But why not step back and take a look at things from outside of the narrative you've been spoon fed about Orange Man Bad, and maybe just admit that you don't like him instead of trying to continue staying attached to a narrative that has completely dissolved?
Ok, so I want to say something. To the Warrior Courts and mmmmmbeers and Never-Trumpers of the board who constantly tell us that Trump does a smash-up job of making himself look so bad all the time.... If that's the case, then why do we have undeniable proof of major "news" entities like ABXi, NBXi, XiNN, XiBS, MSDNC, Faux News, NYT, WaPo, BBC, etc. all selectively editing audio and video of Trump to paint him in a bad light? Why do we now have multiple instances of the eff bee eye and CHP being active participants in a false flag operation during and leading up to J6?
I'll say this, it seems redundant and counterintuitive to spend so much time, resources and energy into making Trump look bad, if he does that well enough on his own. No?
You know what though? If you just hate Trump for whatever reason, that's fine and that's your prerogative. But why not step back and take a look at things from outside of the narrative you've been spoon fed about Orange Man Bad, and maybe just admit that you don't like him instead of trying to continue staying attached to a narrative that has completely dissolved?
Posted on 11/8/25 at 11:34 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
That short clip? He could very well be speaking sarcastically with that laugh.
In the full interview, Vance had commented that “everybody” in politics has a vice. Theo Von then interjected “Release the list!”
Vance laughed and then said “Seriously — we need to release the Epstein list — that is an important thing if we go down that rabbit hole…” I’m not sure how Vance’s comment can be construed as being sarcastic with that opening qualifier?
Yet the full podcast is still available. The comments on Epstein ensued at about 45:50 in the interview so everyone can judge for themselves:
This post was edited on 11/8/25 at 11:39 am
Posted on 11/8/25 at 11:38 am to Toomer Deplorable
Posted on 11/8/25 at 11:44 am to Toomer Deplorable
Laughing and saying " Oh yeah, we need to look into that" absolutely could be seen as sarcasm. Because that's how sarcasm works.
But I do find it curious that Andrew is going to lose his entire official status as a member of the Royal family over a incident with a then 17 yr old who later mysteriously dies... what's to keep HIM from Epsteining himself in the coming months?
If it's that serious, we're never getting 'the list'.
But I do find it curious that Andrew is going to lose his entire official status as a member of the Royal family over a incident with a then 17 yr old who later mysteriously dies... what's to keep HIM from Epsteining himself in the coming months?
If it's that serious, we're never getting 'the list'.
Posted on 11/8/25 at 11:57 am to Bronco11
So this just popped up. Which way is this going to go? Can't put the genie back in the bottle.
Who's getting played? Us?
Either way.............
Who's getting played? Us?
Either way.............
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 11/8/25 at 11:59 am to Bronco11
Posted on 11/8/25 at 11:59 am to Bronco11
Posted on 11/8/25 at 12:00 pm to Bronco11
democrats will do anything for power
Posted on 11/8/25 at 12:01 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Laughing and saying " Oh yeah, we need to look into that" absolutely could be seen as sarcasm. Because that's how sarcasm works.
Seriously?
Just to be clear, that is meant as sarcasm!
Your mileage obviously differs yet I assume J.D. Vance meant that he was speaking earnestly when he said “Seriously, we need to release the list..”
Posted on 11/8/25 at 12:02 pm to Bronco11
Gait Analysis, RIP
Posted on 11/8/25 at 12:04 pm to KCT
quote:
At what age did you sell your soul to the corrupt Political Establishment?
How does me commenting on analysis exclusively relying on gait analysis lead you to that question?
Posted on 11/8/25 at 12:05 pm to Bronco11
Thanks for keeping us updated.
FWIW, when Baker was challenged about the FBI on X, he replied "you think they're the only investigative agency in the country."
FWIW, when Baker was challenged about the FBI on X, he replied "you think they're the only investigative agency in the country."
Posted on 11/8/25 at 12:05 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
FWIW, when Baker was challenged about the FBI on X, he replied "you think they're the only investigative agency in the country."
Posted on 11/8/25 at 12:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
I know nothing of it. Just following along.
I did find it curious that her soccer injury was pronounced to a point of identifying a limp.
Combined with the FBI agent surveillance was exactly next to her place, in a metro of 9 million.
It's either going to be her, or she's going to liquidate the blaze in a lawsuit.
I did find it curious that her soccer injury was pronounced to a point of identifying a limp.
Combined with the FBI agent surveillance was exactly next to her place, in a metro of 9 million.
It's either going to be her, or she's going to liquidate the blaze in a lawsuit.
Posted on 11/8/25 at 12:18 pm to Bronco11
quote:
Combined with the FBI agent surveillance was exactly next to her place, in a metro of 9 million.
It's either going to be her, or she's going to liquidate the blaze in a lawsuit.
This is where I am also...slight lean towards her planting the devices based on Baker's excellent reputation and the surveillance next to her place.
Posted on 11/8/25 at 1:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/8/25 at 1:29 pm to Bronco11
Some intriguing cliff notes in the replies from anons:
'Seraphin believes Baker did gait analysis of every Capitol police officer to track down the culprit who planted inert bombs. Fun fact: Where bombs found was not where they were placed first. One first placed at Congressional Black Caucus office, then moved.'
'Additional fun fact: The key suspect broke her leg in a sports accident in 2015 and while fully recovered, would have an extra-distinguishable post operative gait. Likely boosting the gait analysis softwares accuracy higher than the average 94% in her particular case.'
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 'Seraphin believes Baker did gait analysis of every Capitol police officer to track down the culprit who planted inert bombs. Fun fact: Where bombs found was not where they were placed first. One first placed at Congressional Black Caucus office, then moved.'
'Additional fun fact: The key suspect broke her leg in a sports accident in 2015 and while fully recovered, would have an extra-distinguishable post operative gait. Likely boosting the gait analysis softwares accuracy higher than the average 94% in her particular case.'
Posted on 11/8/25 at 1:39 pm to Toomer Deplorable
It sounds good but unless there's ANOTHER Seth Rich / Julian Assange out there willing to pull up stakes and go live in another country, we're not getting that list.
Page 5 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News