Started By
Message

re: Ivermectin Reduces transmission of Covid-19 by over 80%-90%

Posted on 5/7/21 at 5:29 pm to
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
7587 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Does not make any sense!!!


With respect, you have to do a deep dive into critical thinking on the MSM response and how it would effect the 100s of MM people who cannot perceive the enormity of the world vs their individual reality.
Most of them can’t divide well enough to figure out that the chance of catching and death from cv is less than 0.2% and those who want power through fear know this.
Posted by Bayoubred
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2011
3389 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 5:33 pm to
I love how you twits are always "Please...stop..!!" Probably in a girls voice too...
Posted by Blitzed
Member since Oct 2009
21326 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 5:34 pm to
Medical Felid needs to be held responsible as well.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17062 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 5:35 pm to
Still waiting on a randomized, blinded, placebo controlled trial proving Ivermectin's effectiveness. There are none yet published. All we have are observational, small cohort studies with numerous flaws.

Meanwhile we have numerous 40,000 person RCT's proving the vaccine's efficacy and safety. Not to mention the hundreds of millions of doses given in the real world.

And who wants to constantly take Ivermectin pills when you can take a vaccine once?

ETA: Glad to see someone mention Dr. Campbell. I watch him routinely. He just prevents facts as we know them. However, I think he is too optimistic on Ivermectin.
This post was edited on 5/7/21 at 5:38 pm
Posted by LSU7096
Houston
Member since May 2004
2501 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 5:38 pm to
Bobabooey, blue anon bootlicker for the "follow the science" crowd, only if they can make up the science which is accepted to them
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
7587 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

Meanwhile we have numerous 40,000 person RCT's proving the vaccine's efficacy and safety. Not to mention the hundreds of millions of doses given in the real world.

Certainly, and millions of people took flight on the FAA approved 737max, until two of them nosedived into the Earth. Then we start hearing from pilots who had questioned the avionics.
How is it possible to gauge vax effects long term when we’re not more/less a year from when these vax trials were started?
This post was edited on 5/7/21 at 5:58 pm
Posted by BobABooey
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2004
14322 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

Bobabooey, blue anon bootlicker for the "follow the science" crowd, only if they can make up the science which is accepted to them

Maybe I should have posted under the alter BabylonBooey. It has been fun to watch the downvotes pile up even after including so many dog whistles like settled science, baseless, QAnon, etc.

They say Friday is the worst day of the week for road rage; now I believe it!
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
7612 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 6:04 pm to
There are numerous studies on Ivermectin and in a Pandemic you are going to be waiting for a long, long time to get the type of study you are looking for. It is time to be pragmatic in our approach.

There is no harm putting high risk individuals on Ivermectin as a prophylactic. Zero.

It has also been shown to be very effective when given as soon as one shows symptoms or test positive, and also for early cases. Our initial approach of call us if your fever spikes or your breathing diminishes has proven fatal for so many.

Also, India just had something like 37 providers who were fully vaccinated come down with COVID. With the variant they are seeing, why not make this drug an adjunct to their care? Can you give me a valid reason?



Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
18031 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

That’s why they’re vaccinating people?

If you think the vaccination campaign is going to be the death blow to the COVID sweepstakes, you're f'n retarded.
Posted by jjdogg76
Central
Member since Jun 2020
121 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 6:37 pm to
A world renown Scientist DR. Lori said for the data on Ivermectin to be wrong on its effectiveness

was 1 in 83 trillion!

She put over 50 peer reviewed studies into a program designed to parcel scientific studies and calculate there accuracy to achieve this result but you are not convinced!

1 in 83 trillion!
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32363 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

jjdogg76
LSU Fan
Central
Member since Jun 2020
36 posts
quote:

Wake up People they are LYING TO YOU!!!

Folks here are pretty well read on the subject. Their minds are made up.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32363 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

Still waiting on a randomized, blinded, placebo controlled trial proving Ivermectin's effectiveness.
Why not double blind? Seems like that would make it more valid. But, not a researcher so I don't know.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32363 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Still waiting on a randomized, blinded, placebo controlled trial proving Ivermectin's effectiveness.
Why not double blind? Seems like that would make it more valid. But, not a researcher so I don't know.
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10465 posts
Posted on 5/7/21 at 7:48 pm to
What timing
I am In line to pick up some right now.

first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram