- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/25/26 at 9:50 pm to TigerIron
quote:
I think ivermectin is great but asking patients their opinion is not how you determine if their cancer was cured or improved. You can actually determine that with tests.
Or, you can enroll patients in a study with their doctor's approval, and administer the Ivermectin. Then report the patients status based on testing made in the course of their treatment by their normal doctors, as relayed to you via the patient. Quite likely the results are based on testing. It's hard to say "I feel great" when you are dead, so there is that.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 9:57 pm to BoarEd
quote:
This board could collectively fill 10 pages with anecdotes such as this. We need clinical trials done on these drugs. This study and publication was an attempt to get us there. And look at how it's received by the "doctors" in the house.
Personal friends who are MD's are for this method of treatment. One is a former UT med school prof/reseacher
This post was edited on 7/25/26 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 7/25/26 at 9:58 pm to BoarEd
quote:
The other thing everyone can see is that you are being insulting towards someone for sharing information that was peer reviewed and published as if they had anything to do with that process or are doing anything more than passing it along.
Correct. You got duped by a sensational headline. When others have pointed out the limitations of this study—a study you never bothered to read—you run and hide. Your only “defense” of this study, is that it’s peer reviewed and published. When it’s pointed out that the publisher is taking a closer look at the quality of this paper—you run and hide.
Again, it’s not my fault you have the perspicacity of a potato chip.
quote:
If anyone thinks this guy provides actual care for other human beings they're fooling themselves.
You’re adorable.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:11 pm to BoarEd
FTR, the friend who still takes it for pancreatic cancer, the tumor had shrunk but was still there last fall. He was to go into Boston clinical trial but opted to stay in LA with a 80 something year old nutritional research chemist PhD in Missouri who is client for specialty animal feeds they make for him in LA.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:13 pm to BoarEd
Liberals: (fingers in ears) HORSE PASTE!
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:26 pm to LSUAlum2001
Yesssss you got it bro! Stay away from western medicine. We are gonna save a fortune by funneling MAGA to ivermectin pathways where they can die with minimal cost.
I promise when your betters like Trump, Vance, et al get sick, they’re coming to the hospital to get the evidence based treatments. I bet when it hits the fan with you and your family, you will too—but there’s always hope you’ll put your money (and life) where your online mouth is.
I promise when your betters like Trump, Vance, et al get sick, they’re coming to the hospital to get the evidence based treatments. I bet when it hits the fan with you and your family, you will too—but there’s always hope you’ll put your money (and life) where your online mouth is.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:33 pm to theballguy
quote:
Cancer is caused by protists.
I heard this from my wacko 7th grade science teacher in 1982.
He was right.
No he wasn't. Ivermectin has other ways of fighting cancer that don't include kill bacteria or viruses. I believe it cuts the blood flow to the cancel tumors. Could be wrong and mixing it up with something else but it is definitely affecting cancer by a different route than killing parasites etc.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:38 pm to LakeCharles
quote:
Or, you can enroll patients in a study with their doctor's approval, and administer the Ivermectin. Then report the patients status based on testing made in the course of their treatment by their normal doctors, as relayed to you via the patient. Quite likely the results are based on testing. It's hard to say "I feel great" when you are dead, so there is that.
Or, you could run a company that offers telehealth and it's own pharmacy selling the drugs you are "studying" and you can enroll your existing customers that you know are already paying you for the meds into the "study" — while you are still selling them the meds, btw — all without consulting with those customer's......I mean patient's......doctors who have been treating them for cancer. You could then give them each a survey that you've perfectly tailored to get the answers you desire from the customers......I mean patients......you are "studying".
Every person involved in this study, including all twelve authors, have a vested interest in The Wellness Company, which makes a large portion of its money from its telehealth and pharmacy business selling these two drugs in particular. The Wellness Company makes no claim that it involved any of the patient's oncologists in the study. The only data they have is the questionnaire.
Also, 38% (around a third) of patients dropped out of the study for whatever reason. Somewhere around 25% of patients involved also received conventional cancer treatments and there was no control group or double blind study. Or, at least as far the ones who provided accurate answers to the questionnaire. There is no real way to judge the accuracy of their answers.
This post was edited on 7/25/26 at 10:40 pm
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:38 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Yeah, AI is still going to try to parrot the bullshite like that it isn't even safe to take. Because the entirety of the medical profession is behind this bullshite narrative while knowing full well it's actually perfectly safe and has been administered to millions of people for many years.
Yep. Ivermectin is safer than aspirin yet pharmacies were denying people that had prescriptions for it.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:40 pm to E Redcoat
quote:
We are gonna save a fortune by funneling MAGA to ivermectin pathways where they can die with minimal cost.
quote:
they’re coming to the hospital
Hmm. Sounds like this medical professional let's his politics get in the way of his care for patients.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:42 pm to BoarEd
quote:
That means that more than 70% of the studies that are submitted to the journal don't survive peer review and aren't published by this journal. But this study did survive it and was published.
When it comes to cancer and covid papers that get rejected are probably rejected because pressure is put on the publishers to reject it. Time and time again papers that were printed were later pulled after pressure was applied. It is call good ole corruption.
I remember a time when the MSM was where people looked to get there news. We now know they aren't even news outlets, but instead propaganda publications.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 10:44 pm to BoarEd
Give me the horse wormer!
Posted on 7/25/26 at 11:10 pm to E Redcoat
quote:
Stay away from western medicine
So ivermectin is no longer considered western medicine?
Ignoring a potential treatment that has minimal side effects does what exactly?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 11:23 pm to LSUAlum2001
frick the trolls and idiots in this thread. This is my very best friend growing up. Her daughter graduated first in her class and is a PA, her husband was given 3 weeks to live by doctors at EMORY who was arranging hospice care and then this happened.
It's now a year later and he's still cancer free.
According to his daughter the brain cancer was so advanced that multiple doctors said it was 100% terminal.
This isn't some third party friend of a friend heard from a friend. This is one of my closest friends.
It's now a year later and he's still cancer free.
According to his daughter the brain cancer was so advanced that multiple doctors said it was 100% terminal.
This isn't some third party friend of a friend heard from a friend. This is one of my closest friends.
This post was edited on 7/25/26 at 11:26 pm
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News