- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ivermectin for Cancer Study Peer Reviewed and Published
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:19 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:19 pm to onmymedicalgrind
He just needs a good audit. I swear my emeter is around here somewhere.
0
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:21 pm to BoarEd
Xenu doesn’t approve of your actions in his MEST.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:22 pm to BoarEd
quote:
In other words, no, you don't plan on displaying any integrity. So again, frick off and have a bad day.
I’m sorry you got duped by a clickbait tweet and your thread didn’t got the way you wanted. Neither are my fault. See a therapist.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:23 pm to WheyCheddar
Why are you in here begging for attention like a child? Did mommy not hug you enough?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:25 pm to BoarEd
Please stop withholding. Your ARC has me flummoxed. Get clear and rejoin with Xenu. Mothership?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:29 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
your thread didn’t got the way you wanted.
It's going exactly the way I said it would on page 1. So I see reading comprehension isn't really in your wheelhouse either. Also, 34 upvotes to 9 down. No matter how much you shills may hate it, the word is out and it is spreading. We will pull you dumb frick "medical professionals" to the finish line one way or another.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:30 pm to BoarEd
Why is it that so many people want ivermectin to be a thing?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:31 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Also, 34 upvotes to 9 down
Aww do these PB upvotes keep you warm at night?
No doubt they are simpletons like you, believe whatever Twitter tells you to believe.
Got around to reading this study, yet?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:32 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Aww do these PB upvotes keep you warm at night?
When the question is whether or not the thread went well it's the literal measure this board uses. I'm sorry you don't like it and that you were wrong. Deflecting won't change it.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:34 pm to BoarEd
lol is that how you prompt? Good lord I understand everything about you now
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:34 pm to SlidellCajun
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:35 pm to The_Duke
quote:
lol is that how you prompt? Good lord I understand everything about you now
Well, considering I was right about it and that is no longer in dispute, I don't see the relevance of your post here. Of course, the same could be said of anything you post, so that's nothing new.
What you don't see there is that I had already been discussing this with an AI before I created this thread. That prompt was the final prompt asking it for the specific verbiage stating the article had been peer reviewed.
And low and behold, it was. Amazing, huh?
This post was edited on 7/25/26 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:38 pm to BoarEd
quote:
When the question is whether or not the thread went well it's the literal measure this board uses.
Whatever you say buddy. I promise we’re not laughing at you, we’re laughing with y—-err just kidding we are definitely laughing at you.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:40 pm to BoarEd
quote:
That prompt was the final prompt asking it for the specific verbiage stating the article had been peer reviewed.
And if this peer reviewed journal formally redacts this paper, will you come back and admit that you were wrong about this study? You know, this study you never even bothered to read so your whole justification for buying it’s legit is bc it was published in this peer reviewed journal?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:41 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Do you think that asking the same questions over and over is going to elicit a different response? How frickin stupid are you?
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:50 pm to BoarEd
True, I should know better by now than to expect you to be logically consistent. That’s on me.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:51 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Projection.
Posted on 7/25/26 at 7:56 pm to Rockne
quote:
It wasn’t a clinical trial and wasn’t peer reviewed.
What you posted is FALSE
You should do a tiny bit of research before you post something like that. At least read the thing that you are posting as proof. Damn.
I think it would be great for humanity if Ivermectin was proven to cure cancer, but this crap you posted doesn’t prove a thing.
Do better.
This place loves its pep rallies.
You shouldn't disrupt a perfectly good Ivermectin pep rally with with facts and fact checking. At that point you're just being a buzzkill!
Posted on 7/25/26 at 8:01 pm to BoarEd
Most horses I see are very healthy
Posted on 7/25/26 at 8:03 pm to BoarEd
Imagine posting an article without ever having read it, yet steadfastly defending it 
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News