- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It would seem that the President is trying to tell us something.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This just shows that "globalism" has no real meaning, especially pos Venezuela and Iran conflicts. It never made sense, but it's now opposed to most forms of it from 2016.
I'd say there is probably three, or arguably four, prevailing global ideological factions. Any one could be labeled "globalist" depending upon the perspective and what you are wanting to project.
There are smaller subsets across those.
1
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:19 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Any one could be labeled "globalist" depending upon the perspective and what you are wanting to project.
That's why the term is purposefully malleable.
Same as "Deep State"
You don't get more "Deep State" than Iran. We have 100% documented proof that the CIA engaged in a coup in 1953 to protect the Shah and defend him until 1979 when we simply could not anymore. And they have done all sorts of shite to thwart/oppose Iran, thereafter, including backing Saddam Hussein and creating that whole situation in Iraq.
And the only way posters who won't accept that have to spin it is via the false assumption that the "Deep State" could easily take Iran, which this war shows is retarded. This assumption is a common mistake with the muh CIA types. The CIA more often than not fricks things up and causes chaos and unintended negative externalities that THEN require more meddling (see; Iraq example above).
That's why these discussions require dot-connecting and not facts/logic.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:19 pm to DownHome
He’s just retruthing Q Tards. That doesn’t mean he’s “going full Q directly” or otherwise hinting at some impending “boom”/master plan.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:22 pm to Ailsa
I see that my post brought all the smooth brains together. Kind of like old times. 
Let's get the party started.
Let's get the party started.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Iran has opposed the "Deep State" and "globalism" since 1979
This ain't about who Iran supports. It's about who supports Iran.
You thought Trump had unified support from the Deep State when he went into Iran?
Only MIC slaves really. Everyone else was against it weren't they?
This post was edited on 5/26/26 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I’m having a hard time thinking of anything less “globalist” than trying to do regime change in three countries (Cuba, Venezuela, obsensibly Iran) and taking over Greenland.
This just shows that "globalism" has no real meaning, especially pos Venezuela and Iran conflicts. It never made sense, but it's now opposed to most forms of it from 2016.
This post was edited on 5/26/26 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This just shows that "globalism" has no real meaning, especially pos Venezuela and Iran conflicts. It never made sense, but it's now opposed to most forms of it from 2016.
Stay clueless, fool.
I guess you think the WEF is simply a harmless little club.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
Ask the Ayatollah if we can't.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
How am I “arguing that this is a Deep State op”? Fact: Iran was enriching uranium to develop nuclear weapons. Do you deny this? If not, I’ll ask again “Are you okay with a nuclear armed Iran?”
Personally, I am conflicted on whether stopping them from having nukes is worth going to war. A nuclear armed Iran is really Israel’s problem, not ours, so I say let Israel handle it.
Personally, I am conflicted on whether stopping them from having nukes is worth going to war. A nuclear armed Iran is really Israel’s problem, not ours, so I say let Israel handle it.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:41 pm to DownHome
As for where the uranium came from, Trump told us
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are we stopping the Iran war?
which war?
Posted on 5/26/26 at 1:52 pm to Taxing Authority
Cuba - Yet to be determined, by all accounts it will be a peaceful transition.
Venezuela - Non elected cartel boss that took over the country
Iran - Finally ending the 50 year war
Greenland - Took over Greenland, WTF you smoking? They allowed us to have 3 bases there
Venezuela - Non elected cartel boss that took over the country
Iran - Finally ending the 50 year war
Greenland - Took over Greenland, WTF you smoking? They allowed us to have 3 bases there
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:12 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Iran, Russia, and China are the 3 enemies of "globalism"
They certainly aren't against weakening the US, which mass migration and sending manufacturing to China and the 3rd world are core tenents of. They want "globalism for thee, but not for me" inasmuch as it leads to the end of US hegemony and the petro dollar.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:24 pm to VoxDawg
For those unfamiliar:
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:25 pm to i am dan
quote:
This ain't about who Iran supports. It's about who supports Iran.
Russia and China, the 2 largest opposing forces to the "Deep State" and "globalism"
I already covered this
quote:
You thought Trump had unified support from the Deep State when he went into Iran?
You're changing my words.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:27 pm to RandRules
quote:
How am I “arguing that this is a Deep State op”? Fact: Iran was enriching uranium to develop nuclear weapons. Do you deny this? If not, I’ll ask again “Are you okay with a nuclear armed Iran?”
I covered this
This whole thing is a Deep State talking point
quote:
They LOVE to create those talking point summaries to trigger the reptile brain of people.
It's "WMDs" or "they hate are freedom" all over again.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:28 pm to DownHome
quote:
Iran - Finally ending the 50 year war
It's a 73 year war, and how does this "end" it?
quote:
Venezuela - Non elected cartel boss that took over the country
We removed a pawn of the anti-globalists to force globalism in Venezuela
quote:
Cuba - Yet to be determined, by all accounts it will be a peaceful transition.
We may do to Cuba what we did to Venezuela: spread globalism and remove lesser anti-globalist players from the chess board.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:30 pm to olgoi khorkhoi
quote:
They certainly aren't against weakening the US, which mass migration and sending manufacturing to China and the 3rd world are core tenents of. They want "globalism for thee, but not for me" inasmuch as it leads to the end of US hegemony and the petro dollar.
US hegemony and the petrodollar are tenets of most versions of "globalism"
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:35 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Ailsa, you stand with deep state ghouls Victoria Nuland and Mike Pompeo.
And apparently you stand with the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism. But we already know that about you after all your frickin crying over cartel members being killed running drugs.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News