re: It would seem that the President is trying to tell us something.

quote:

---

Any one could be labeled "globalist" depending upon the perspective and what you are wanting to project.

---

That's why the term is purposefully malleable.

Same as "Deep State"

You don't get more "Deep State" than Iran. We have 100% documented proof that the CIA engaged in a coup in 1953 to protect the Shah and defend him until 1979 when we simply could not anymore. And they have done all sorts of shite to thwart/oppose Iran, thereafter, including backing Saddam Hussein and creating that whole situation in Iraq.

And the only way posters who won't accept that have to spin it is via the false assumption that the "Deep State" could easily take Iran, which this war shows is retarded. This assumption is a common mistake with the muh CIA types. The CIA more often than not fricks things up and causes chaos and unintended negative externalities that THEN require more meddling (see; Iraq example above).

That's why these discussions require dot-connecting and not facts/logic.

I see that my post brought all the smooth brains together. Kind of like old times.

Let's get the party started.

quote:

---

This just shows that "globalism" has no real meaning, especially pos Venezuela and Iran conflicts. It never made sense, but it's now opposed to most forms of it from 2016.

---

I’m having a hard time thinking of anything less “globalist” than trying to do regime change in three countries (Cuba, Venezuela, obsensibly Iran) and taking over Greenland.

quote:

---

This just shows that "globalism" has no real meaning, especially pos Venezuela and Iran conflicts. It never made sense, but it's now opposed to most forms of it from 2016.

---

Stay clueless, fool.


I guess you think the WEF is simply a harmless little club.

How am I “arguing that this is a Deep State op”? Fact: Iran was enriching uranium to develop nuclear weapons. Do you deny this? If not, I’ll ask again “Are you okay with a nuclear armed Iran?”

Personally, I am conflicted on whether stopping them from having nukes is worth going to war. A nuclear armed Iran is really Israel’s problem, not ours, so I say let Israel handle it.

quote:

---

Are we stopping the Iran war?

---

which war?