- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It would seem that the President is trying to tell us something.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:38 pm to AlterEd
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:38 pm to AlterEd
We literally created a fake cartel that people on this board thought Maduro was a member of, then said "oh, just kidding" when the propaganda was no longer necessary.


Posted on 5/26/26 at 3:11 pm to Bunk Moreland
You can try and justify it all you want, but you now have an established history of engaging in apologetics on behalf of terrorist organizations.
Posted on 5/26/26 at 3:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
I’m not arguing whether keeping Iran from going nuclear is a deep state talking point. It is, but that is the crux of the argument. I’m asking you if it is true that Iran was trying to build a nuclear weapon. If so, are you okay with Iran having nuclear capabilities?
Posted on 5/26/26 at 4:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Because that war is completely supported by the "Deep State"
Easy to say but what do you mean by this? Who are some of the "completely" who support the war?
Posted on 5/26/26 at 6:25 pm to VoxDawg
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Trump averages ~18 posts per day on Truth Social.
Less than 0.5% of his posts are Q-related memes/slogans.
Only 0.6% of Q's posts are signed with “Q+”.
Yet today he dropped two “Q+” memes just minutes apart.
Trump is thought to actually be Q+
Odds of that happening in a 10-minute window?
1 in 500,000 to 1 in 2.8 million.
DO YOU BELIEVE IN COINCIDENCE?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
US hegemony and the petrodollar are tenets of most versions of "globalism"
US hegemony and the petrodollar are tenets of all version of any govt.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:14 am to AlterEd
quote:
You can try and justify it all you want, but you now have an established history of engaging in apologetics on behalf of terrorist organizations.
The best part is after getting absolutely owned (again) you pivot to *checks notes* Deep State talking points
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:15 am to RandRules
quote:
I’m asking you if it is true that Iran was trying to build a nuclear weapon.
They've been trying since the 70s.
The more pertinent question is how far along they actually were.
When this war is over, they will start their nuclear program over again, just as they did after we purportedly destroyed it last summer.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:16 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
but what do you mean by this?
The Deep State has had 70+ years of conflict in Iran specifically, and has been trying to stage another coup since 1979. That coup has always been a high priority for the Deep State, and Iran, since 1979, has become a larger and more influential foil to the Deep State and globalism, basically every year.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:17 am to i am dan
quote:
US hegemony and the petrodollar are tenets of all version of any govt.
No. They are recent developments. Only about 50 years old for the petrodollar and 35-ish for US hegemony.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
You think middle aged men should be allowed to go into the restrooms of 5 year old girls.
Therefore, we don't need to even read anything you write.
Therefore, we don't need to even read anything you write.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:47 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:Q always seemed like spooks using a red penlight as a distraction.
Somehow we have people posting Q tard slop all of these years later.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:47 am to John somers
quote:
You think middle aged men should be allowed to go into the restrooms of 5 year old girls.
Therefore, we don't need to even read anything you write.
Or engage...don't feed the trolls.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:05 am to SlowFlowPro
Oh, really? So now you say the really important question is how far along they were in building an atomic weapon. How far along should it have been before the US acted militarily to stop it? What is your threshold that merits action? Or should we not act at all?
The fact is the US is in a no win situation. If we want to stop their nuclear program, this war is necessary. If we don’t, it’s not. What is confusing you about this?
The fact is the US is in a no win situation. If we want to stop their nuclear program, this war is necessary. If we don’t, it’s not. What is confusing you about this?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:30 am to John somers
quote:
You think middle aged men should be allowed to go into the restrooms of 5 year old girls.
No. No I don't.
quote:
Therefore, we don't need to even read anything you write.
You mean you don't need to read anything the the strawman you created writes
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:31 am to RandRules
quote:
So now you say the really important question is how far along they were in building an atomic weapon.
Given the fact that this regime will always be building one, yes.
Otherwise you're arguing for literal perpetual war.
quote:
The fact is the US is in a no win situation.
That's exactly why the term quagmire is applicable to war with Iran and why it hasn't been attempted directly by the US since 1979
It's a war we cannot win
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When this war is over, they will start their nuclear program over again
That's correct.
But they'll be starting after having taken the big slide on the Candyland board.
If we have to do this every ten years or so, then we have to do this every ten years or so. It is what it is.
The implied argument that we needn't bother because this one action won't solve the problem is as dumb as saying that I shouldn't brush my teeth today because I'm just going to have to do it again tomorrow.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's a war we cannot win
It is a war we can lose, though.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Deep State has had 70+ years of conflict in Iran specifically, and has been trying to stage another coup since 1979. That coup has always been a high priority for the Deep State, and Iran, since 1979, has become a larger and more influential foil to the Deep State and globalism, basically every year.
If the Deep State is that ineffective, it's not really worth worrying about, is it?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 2:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
SFP, I’ve noticed something unique in the way you debate: You never explicitly state your position on anything. Why? This is not a gotcha question, I am genuinely interested to know. TIA
Popular
Back to top


1








