Started By
Message

re: It would seem that the President is trying to tell us something.

Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:38 pm to
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
69672 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 2:38 pm to
We literally created a fake cartel that people on this board thought Maduro was a member of, then said "oh, just kidding" when the propaganda was no longer necessary.

Posted by AlterEd
Cydonia, Mars
Member since Dec 2024
13988 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 3:11 pm to
You can try and justify it all you want, but you now have an established history of engaging in apologetics on behalf of terrorist organizations.
Posted by RandRules
Member since Mar 2025
516 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 3:15 pm to
I’m not arguing whether keeping Iran from going nuclear is a deep state talking point. It is, but that is the crux of the argument. I’m asking you if it is true that Iran was trying to build a nuclear weapon. If so, are you okay with Iran having nuclear capabilities?
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24429 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

Because that war is completely supported by the "Deep State"

Easy to say but what do you mean by this? Who are some of the "completely" who support the war?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
78916 posts
Posted on 5/26/26 at 6:25 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

Trump averages ~18 posts per day on Truth Social.
Less than 0.5% of his posts are Q-related memes/slogans.
Only 0.6% of Q's posts are signed with “Q+”.

Yet today he dropped two “Q+” memes just minutes apart.
Trump is thought to actually be Q+

Odds of that happening in a 10-minute window?
1 in 500,000 to 1 in 2.8 million.

DO YOU BELIEVE IN COINCIDENCE?
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
32190 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:11 am to
quote:

US hegemony and the petrodollar are tenets of most versions of "globalism"


US hegemony and the petrodollar are tenets of all version of any govt.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481023 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:14 am to
quote:

You can try and justify it all you want, but you now have an established history of engaging in apologetics on behalf of terrorist organizations.




The best part is after getting absolutely owned (again) you pivot to *checks notes* Deep State talking points
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481023 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:15 am to
quote:

I’m asking you if it is true that Iran was trying to build a nuclear weapon.

They've been trying since the 70s.

The more pertinent question is how far along they actually were.

When this war is over, they will start their nuclear program over again, just as they did after we purportedly destroyed it last summer.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481023 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:16 am to
quote:

but what do you mean by this?

The Deep State has had 70+ years of conflict in Iran specifically, and has been trying to stage another coup since 1979. That coup has always been a high priority for the Deep State, and Iran, since 1979, has become a larger and more influential foil to the Deep State and globalism, basically every year.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481023 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:17 am to
quote:

US hegemony and the petrodollar are tenets of all version of any govt.

No. They are recent developments. Only about 50 years old for the petrodollar and 35-ish for US hegemony.
Posted by John somers
Los Proxima
Member since Oct 2024
1809 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:33 am to
You think middle aged men should be allowed to go into the restrooms of 5 year old girls.

Therefore, we don't need to even read anything you write.
Posted by Pragmatist2025
Member since Jun 2025
1351 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Somehow we have people posting Q tard slop all of these years later.
Q always seemed like spooks using a red penlight as a distraction.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
11029 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 8:47 am to
quote:


You think middle aged men should be allowed to go into the restrooms of 5 year old girls.

Therefore, we don't need to even read anything you write.


Or engage...don't feed the trolls.
Posted by RandRules
Member since Mar 2025
516 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:05 am to
Oh, really? So now you say the really important question is how far along they were in building an atomic weapon. How far along should it have been before the US acted militarily to stop it? What is your threshold that merits action? Or should we not act at all?

The fact is the US is in a no win situation. If we want to stop their nuclear program, this war is necessary. If we don’t, it’s not. What is confusing you about this?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481023 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:30 am to
quote:

You think middle aged men should be allowed to go into the restrooms of 5 year old girls.

No. No I don't.

quote:

Therefore, we don't need to even read anything you write.

You mean you don't need to read anything the the strawman you created writes
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481023 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:31 am to
quote:

So now you say the really important question is how far along they were in building an atomic weapon.

Given the fact that this regime will always be building one, yes.

Otherwise you're arguing for literal perpetual war.

quote:

The fact is the US is in a no win situation.

That's exactly why the term quagmire is applicable to war with Iran and why it hasn't been attempted directly by the US since 1979

It's a war we cannot win

Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14637 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:35 am to
quote:

When this war is over, they will start their nuclear program over again


That's correct.

But they'll be starting after having taken the big slide on the Candyland board.

If we have to do this every ten years or so, then we have to do this every ten years or so. It is what it is.

The implied argument that we needn't bother because this one action won't solve the problem is as dumb as saying that I shouldn't brush my teeth today because I'm just going to have to do it again tomorrow.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14637 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:36 am to
quote:

It's a war we cannot win


It is a war we can lose, though.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
14637 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 9:37 am to
quote:

The Deep State has had 70+ years of conflict in Iran specifically, and has been trying to stage another coup since 1979. That coup has always been a high priority for the Deep State, and Iran, since 1979, has become a larger and more influential foil to the Deep State and globalism, basically every year.


If the Deep State is that ineffective, it's not really worth worrying about, is it?
Posted by RandRules
Member since Mar 2025
516 posts
Posted on 5/27/26 at 2:16 pm to
SFP, I’ve noticed something unique in the way you debate: You never explicitly state your position on anything. Why? This is not a gotcha question, I am genuinely interested to know. TIA
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram