Started By
Message

re: It seems Mamoud khalil will likely win his immigration court hearing.

Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:35 pm to
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2402 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:35 pm to
They did give a reason that seems to satisfy the statutory language.
You can attack that reason but there is a reason and basis for removal.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98072 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

Aaron Maté@aaronjmate
What kind of a human being gets triggered by a Palestinian showing their country's original map -- its name was "Palestine" -- before it was stolen from them by a Jewish supremacist state?




You think Im gonna take this dude serious

To the victor goes the spoils.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

Which of those laws apply to the head of the executive branch?

Immigration is under the executive branch

Visa's are 100% issued at the executives discretion


Mamoud khalil is not here on a visa. Also, we have an immigration court, so it would seem the executive branch doesn't exert full control over all this.
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8425 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

What were these illegal activities?


It is my understanding that he was part of the student protest that locked themselves in a campus building and he was the negotiator

That is illegal whether charges or not
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83979 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

Mamoud khalil is not here on a visa
green cards, too
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:40 pm to
quote:

It is my understanding that he was part of the student protest that locked themselves in a campus building and he was the negotiator

That is illegal whether charges or not


Marco Rubio. Secretary of State for the United States of America has made it clear Mamoud khalil has engaged in not one single unlawful act.
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
6073 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:40 pm to
Way too much time and tax dollars spent on this clown.

Trump needs to nut up.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28579 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

They don't have to alledge criminal conduct. His conduct and rhetoric are antithetical to the US by voicing support and enticing civil disruption for a Terrorist Organization .

Apparently not. The administration would have had to put on some evidence of this in order to prevail. Doesn’t sound like they have any such evidence. In a contradictory hearing on the issue, no evidence typically means you lose.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37317 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

I know CNN and MSNBC told you that is not the case, but it is. Sorry. These judges are out of line.

No, they do not. “Non-citizens” is too broad of a categorization for that statement.

No, POTUS cannot remove legal permanent residents without cause or due process, for example.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23792 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

You can live your entire life in the US. You can marry, you can work here, buy a home here and pay taxes here but you're going to have to live under a diluted set rights


No, he just can't openly support terrorism and encourage others to be hostile to this nation and its beliefs. If any person does this, they should be exported back to whatever country they are supporting.
If they dislike the American way so much, fricking leave it!!! Its really simple.

Furthermore, if I went to another country and started crying and advocating for America and criticizing the country I was in..... I would expect that country to send me packing.
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
13193 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:44 pm to
This terrorist life’s over on the political front.

It will have a watch over it from now till it becomes dust.

Let the system work…
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

No, they do not. “Non-citizens” is too broad of a categorization for that statement.

No, POTUS cannot remove legal permanent residents without cause or due process, for example.


I think this might be why we have immigration courts and an appeal process.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37317 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

I think this might be why we have immigration courts and an appeal process.

Right. Which would be the due process that I’m talking about.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61391 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

Which of those laws apply to the head of the executive branch?


Can you point to the thing that states the head of the executive branch can do whatever he wants whenever he wants even if it contradicts laws?
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61391 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

It is my understanding that he was part of the student protest that locked themselves in a campus building and he was the negotiator


Trump said he is being deported for being antisemitic.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

No, he just can't openly support terrorism and encourage others to be hostile to this nation and its beliefs. If any person does this, they should be exported back to whatever country they are supporting.
If they dislike the American way so much, fricking leave it!!! Its really simple.

Furthermore, if I went to another country and started crying and advocating for America and criticizing the country I was in..... I would expect that country to send me packing.


The immigration judge has asked for evidence that these things have happened. The United States Government cannot produce such evidence.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23018 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:50 pm to
I think anyone speaking definitively on this is taking some leaps, because this doesn't sound like it's settled case law. I'd expect it to make its way all the way to the supreme court before we find out.

Personally it doesn't sound right that the executive branch can deport a green card holder for any (or no) reason, but the courts may decide differently. That just sounds ripe for abuse to me. A Harris win would've meant that a legal resident could be deported for attending a pro-life rally or criticizing the US handling of Ukraine. I don't like that type of overreach
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
21114 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

quote:
I think this might be why we have immigration courts and an appeal process.

Right. Which would be the due process that I’m talking about.


You're right. I wasn't questioning it.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61391 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

he just can't openly support terrorism and encourage others to be hostile to this nation and its beliefs


When exactly did he do this? Can you send the evidence to Marco Rubio? He said this man has not broken any laws so you obviously know things that the FBI does not.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
83979 posts
Posted on 4/10/25 at 6:52 pm to
The head of the Executive branch has broad powers with respect to the Executive branch

Same as it ever was
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram