- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/1/26 at 2:53 pm to wadewilson
Yeah I know. Being normal doesnt require meds
Being a lunatic like yourself at a minimum.needs lithium
Seek help
Being a lunatic like yourself at a minimum.needs lithium
Seek help
Posted on 3/1/26 at 2:58 pm to SDVTiger
Whatever you say, sweetheart.
ETA: upvoting your own posts. Noice.
ETA: upvoting your own posts. Noice.
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:01 pm to wadewilson
Maybe you need xanax
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:01 pm to RFK
Just because it’s never been done to date, doesn’t mean it won’t ever happen. Be patient grasshopper.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:01 pm to SDVTiger
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:09 pm to wadewilson
Your solicitation to provide oral sex is disturbing.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:10 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Of course it would require logistical assistance, but I'm sure it could be provided.
You've gotten too accustomed to the miracles the US is able to pull off. That's 980 C-17 trips to drop the troops (assuming they are all airborne ETA: which they most certainly are not), with no armor, no artillery, almost no signal support, and 2-3 days worth of supplies.
quote:
every soldier requires multiple tons of supply per day in high-intensity combat.
For 100,000 troops, you’d need daily:
Fuel (tanks, APCs, generators, aircraft)
Ammunition (huge volumes in peer conflict)
Food and water
Medical evacuation and hospitals
Spare parts and maintenance units
Rough scale:
Hundreds to thousands of trucks per day
Continuous airlift or rail (which doesn’t exist across that route)
Massive fuel pipelines or convoys
And every mile of that supply chain is a target.
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:12 pm to wadewilson
Hate him or love him, if you seriously think THIS president is going to let China walk into Iran & take over your hate is starting to fry your brain. Such as it may be.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:24 pm to AlterEd
quote:
America does not need to send troops in.
AMEN. Trump needs to wrap up U.S. operations in the region, and put a bow on it as a gift it to Israel and/or Saudi Arabia. For once, let these bloodsucking parasites put their own skin in the game.
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:24 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
AMEN. Trump needs to wrap up U.S. operations in the region, and put a bow on it as a gift it to Israel and/or Saudi Arabia. For once, let these bloodsucking parasites put their own skin in the game.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:29 pm to Jbird
quote:
What is the issue here?
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:31 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Every day with the Joos bullshite
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:43 pm to Jbird
quote:
Every day with the Joos bullshite
Good grief! You think like a prog.
Every opinion on Israel that you disagree with is not an example of antisemitism. And it makes a mockery of the term to apply it in such a manner.
The point here is the other regional military powers in the Middle East — including Israel AND Saudi Arabia AND Turkey — each have clear strategic reasons to oppose a nuclear-armed Iran. These nations also possess advanced, capable militaries.
If they view Iran as an existential threat, they are in a position to coordinate and act accordingly. If Iran must be stopped, let these other regional powers form a coalition that will bear the costs and assume the consequences.
The United States is not obligated to referee these long-standing regional rivalries based on ancient sectarian divisions. Many Americans — including a significant segment of the MAGA coalition — are increasingly skeptical of continuing to be expected to shoulder the financial and strategic burdens of the United States serving as Global Cop.
This post was edited on 3/1/26 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:43 pm to wadewilson
quote:
We'll have infantry on the ground inside of a month.
If anything the gulf states will provide the troops to keep it stable if needed. Would be better that way anyway. We set the possibility let them police it.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:44 pm to wadewilson
quote:
We'll have infantry on the ground inside of a month.
Yep.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:45 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Turkey? FFS really?
I flew out of that shithole, and it's a fricking shithole infested with Muslim nutbags in leadership.
All they gaf about is killing Kurds.
I flew out of that shithole, and it's a fricking shithole infested with Muslim nutbags in leadership.
All they gaf about is killing Kurds.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:55 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
The United States is not obligated to referee these long-standing regional rivalries based on ancient sectarian divisions. Many Americans — including a significant segment of the MAGA coalition — are increasingly skeptical of continuing to be expected to shoulder the financial
Iran has been at war with the United States since 1979, even if you wish it wasn't. Beirut, Khobar towers, etc? US embassies being bombed in Africa? Kidnappings, hijackings, no matter.
And just because you have a special focus on the Israelis, the money we loan them is used to purchase stuff from Raytheon and Northrup Grumman, etc. They've already discussed winding down the 3Billion a year we send them to be more independent.
But we'll have the same debate 3 more times this week just the same.
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:58 pm to RoyalWe
Posted on 3/1/26 at 3:59 pm to AlterEd
That says nothing about them putting boots on the ground in Iran. Doesn’t even imply it
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News