- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Iran told Witkoff they had enough material to make 11 nukes
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:48 am to Timeoday
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:48 am to Timeoday
quote:
If Iran were to launch a nuke it gets taken out in their airspace. Then they have to deal with an EMP scenario.
They don't have to launch a vehicle. They can send the material via ship and assemble here in the states. Detonate it anywhere they want. It's the "Sum Of All Fears" scenario. More plausible than not. Especially with the Muslim enclaves now established here, like in Texas.
1
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:09 am to SallysHuman
quote:
11 pops up a lot.
11 ships sunk
11 warheads
Kamenei killd on the islamic 9/11
Excellent Pattern Recognition, SH.
The Number 11 is said to be a Sacred Number in the Occult, Witchcraft, and Satanism.
#11 NOT accidental or coincidental. We see these occult numerology codes all the time in media and goob reports. It's a form of casting magic. #33 of course is the favorite number of "news" reports.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:14 am to texas tortilla
quote:
I have lost all conference in witkoff/trump when it comes to negotiations.
You know you can't negotiate with people who refuse to negotiate, right?
If I have no intention of buying a car and I leave the dealership without a car, does that make the salesperson bad at his job or does it simply mean that I was never going to buy?
Iran has refused to stop enriching uranium even though they are at 60%. Civilian use is 1-3%.
Can anyone against the attacks explain how iran wasn't pursuing a nuclear weapon when their uranium is already 20-60x the necessary use for energy and they said they wouldn't stop trying to enrich it more?
These were Iran's own words. So, the argument that Bibi has been saying they were going to do it for 30 years is pretty dumb. You have to literally ignore everything iran has said in the past month of discussion and everything that was done to hinder their progress for 3 decades.
If you think this is all about Israel, then you just can't think rationally. You are ignoring the words of Iran just so you can blame israel. You are ignoring facts just so you can push a narrative.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:15 am to blueboy
quote:
Iran told Witkoff
Yeah, I agree -- no way to verify that this is true other than "He said so".
And somehow, someway THIS nonsense is believed. Gaslighting sheep has never been an easier task. They question or challenge next to nothing.
Have you noticed a clear pattern that's evolved here? There seems to be a two different "Parallel Realities" at this board.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:17 am to td01241
quote:
f Iran had a nuclear bomb or the various components and institutional knowledge still alive to compile them they would’ve used it immediately against Israel when the Ayotollah was killed. Their ballistic missiles can easily reach there and into Europe all they need to do is attach the warhead if they could
For all we know this already happened and it was shot down. You think the governments would ever let it be publicly known a nuke was launched at them? The public fear ramifications are way too vast for something like that.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:18 am to Azkiger
quote:
Have the material for 11 nukes and are able to build 11 nukes are two different things.
This seems to be the point a lot of people are missing.
They didn't have 11 nukes or say they did. They said they had the material...
Which is a direct threat they tried to use as negotiations, because threats like that worked in the past on Obama and Biden.
You can say a lot of things about Trump but a threat like that isn't going to work on him.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:18 am to NashvilleTider
quote:not no mo.
Iran told Witkoff they had enough material to make 11 nukes
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:25 am to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
The point everyone is missing is Iran had taken some of the enriched uranium out and hid it. That what he Witkoff is talking about. That stuff is still deadly just strapped to a conventional warhead.
a) Why couldn't Iran also easily "strap on" fatal WMD bio-weapons to conventional warheads?
b) In June 2025 America assured the world whatever "Nuke Facility" had existed was annihilated. Was that a big fat lie?
c) Developing "Nuclear power" is a real thing for advanced nations. Why must the narrative always assumed Iranian "Uranium Enrichment" = "Nukes to use on Isreal"?
d) Both (Muslim) Pakistan and India have nuke weapons and hate each other. Is no one concerned about the "threat" either poses?
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:25 am to EphesianArmor
quote:Right. He didn't say anything about 'Iran' telling him they had nuke material until after this attack, and did so in an informal setting where what he said could not be legally attacked.
Yeah, I agree -- no way to verify that this is true other than "He said so".
So more 'two weeks away from nuke' bullshite like the kind we've been fed for over three decades.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:27 am to RelicBatches86
I’m skeptical of all of this but supposedly they had moved materials out to other places before the strike and while we heavily damaged their ability to refine more they probably have product that with the right knowledge and equipment could be turned into nuclear weapons in the future.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:29 am to LemmyLives
quote:
Muh! Bibi made us do it! Retards.
Lyin' Lemmy -- why do constant gatekeep and project your hate and disdain upon Christians?
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:37 am to RelicBatches86
That's assuming that all of their nuclear weapons program was housed at any of the 3 nuclear plants.
Not saying they weren't, but that would be dumb to do so.
We know that they moved portions of their enriched uranium to undisclosed sights before any military action.
Not saying they weren't, but that would be dumb to do so.
We know that they moved portions of their enriched uranium to undisclosed sights before any military action.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:38 am to tide06
quote:
I’m skeptical of all of this but supposedly they had moved materials out to other places before the strike and while we heavily damaged their ability to refine more they probably have product that with the right knowledge and equipment could be turned into nuclear weapons in the future.
Concur with your speculation. Iran is a huge country and presumably not stupid.
That said, I believe the whole "OMG!! NUKES!!!" fear porn and bogeyman subject has been just that. Nuclear weapons have been archaic, obsolete 1940s tech (even IF it's existed at all.)
The truly frightening weaponry that have long been developed ( and being used ) are DEWs, RF, and EMPs. And of course all these hundreds or thousands of Bio-Labs and stealth Bio-Weapons present a different danger to humanity -- but few seem to be concerned about them.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:40 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
d) Both (Muslim) Pakistan and India have nuke weapons and hate each other. Is no one concerned about the "threat" either poses?
I don’t think anyone is thrilled that Pakistan has nukes. Do you want us to attack a nuclear armed Pakistan? Is that what you’re suggesting?
Iran is the “death to America” group that funds terrorism which has killed Americans. Just all around good folk.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:43 am to blueboy
quote:
So more 'two weeks away from nuke' bullshite like the kind we've been fed for over three decades.
"Nukes" served their purpose. Bibi Inc got their wish. Let's see how quickly additional Bogeyman-threat situations arise and reason to destroy / invade / occupy that / those nations.
quote:
He didn't say anything about 'Iran' telling him they had nuke material until after this attack, and did so in an informal setting where what he said could not be legally attacked.
Tactical "slip". Media outlets and sheep run with it. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:44 am to biglego
quote:
I don’t think anyone is thrilled that Pakistan has nukes. Do you want us to attack a nuclear armed Pakistan? Is that what you’re suggesting?
On what planet?
quote:
Iran is the “death to America” group that funds terrorism which has killed Americans.
Sure Jan.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 9:44 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
And of course all these hundreds or thousands of Bio-Labs and stealth Bio-Weapons present a different danger to humanity -- but few seem to be concerned about them.
Good point.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 10:14 am to wackatimesthree
First problem for Iran with a workable nuke. How do they intend to deliver the nuke? By camel?
Iranian engineers went for an all expenses paid vacation to watch North Korea do their best to miniaturize a warhead for a missile. North Korea collapsed their test mountain and the ragheads came home. Maybe the North Korean hookers are worse than sex slaves in Iran. Both Iran and North Korea failed.
Centrifuges are a “continual process”type of commodity. Interrupt the power supply……..start all over again. Centrifuges are also in need for a serious solid base.Disrupted, their stop operating. Something like an earthquake or inside a tunnel disruption ends the process. That and losing 240 scientists is a serious interruption. Doubtfull Iran has the material or a delivery system.
Iranian engineers went for an all expenses paid vacation to watch North Korea do their best to miniaturize a warhead for a missile. North Korea collapsed their test mountain and the ragheads came home. Maybe the North Korean hookers are worse than sex slaves in Iran. Both Iran and North Korea failed.
Centrifuges are a “continual process”type of commodity. Interrupt the power supply……..start all over again. Centrifuges are also in need for a serious solid base.Disrupted, their stop operating. Something like an earthquake or inside a tunnel disruption ends the process. That and losing 240 scientists is a serious interruption. Doubtfull Iran has the material or a delivery system.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 10:18 am to Lg
You are exactly right about it. I do believe we knew they had the material but we needed to wait for another opportunity. I pray this run settles their ambition and the material is recovered.
Posted on 3/3/26 at 3:16 pm to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
Do you watch any news? You should!
Why should I ever watch the "news" when everything you just mentioned is already known.
Dude, are you programmed by the news? You sure make a person think that you are.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News