- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I’m glad they didn’t arrest Comey
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:45 pm to Riverside
Posted on 5/17/25 at 2:45 pm to Riverside
quote:
I would have cheered if Comey had been charged.
And what exact crime are we talking about possibly or possibly not being charged here? Has anyone actually specified the precise crime? No asshoe, serious question. It’s very possible that I’ve missed the reference(s) to said specific crime (i.e. federal statute).
And don’t take my question the wrong way. I loathe that scumbag poon.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:01 pm to FLTech
There would not have been riots. Nobody rioting over a rich white dude. Mainstream media, however, would have lost it.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:02 pm to FLTech
quote:
I’m glad they didn’t arrest Comey
No you're not. Stop making shite up.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:03 pm to Hangover Haven
quote:
No one is rioting over James Comey...
I chuckled. Have a Saturday afternoon upvote.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:06 pm to Faurot fodder
quote:
I don't GAF what happens to him.
This is best possible attitude MAGA could have over this. That motherfricker should be given no more thought than wiping shite off your shoe.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:09 pm to davyjones
quote:
And what exact crime are we talking about possibly or possibly not being charged here? Has anyone actually specified the precise crime? No asshoe, serious question. It’s very possible that I’ve missed the reference(s) to said specific crime (i.e. federal statute).
And don’t take my question the wrong way. I loathe that scumbag poon
Your question is fair. It's unfortunate you have to qualify it with that.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:10 pm to davyjones
18 USC Sect. 115 for starters.
quote:
18 U.S. Code § 115 - Influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a Federal official by threatening or injuring a family member
quote:
(a) (1) Whoever— (A) assaults, kidnaps, or murders, or attempts or conspires to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap or murder a member of the immediate family of a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under section 1114 of this title; or (B) threatens to assault, kidnap, or murder, a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under such section, with intent to impede, intimidate, or interfere with such official, judge, or law enforcement officer while engaged in the performance of official duties, or with intent to retaliate against such official, judge, or law enforcement officer on account of the performance of official duties, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:13 pm to Pandy Fackler
Mmm that might be just a tad over the top. I see where you’re going with it, but you way overselling it. In fact, there is an ideal level of care and concern to be paid to the guy and this matter, and it’s somewhere between the approach that you’re currently lambasting, and the one you just endorsed. Probably right smack dab in the middle of those two ends.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:17 pm to Pandy Fackler
Any updates on Mahmoud Khalil? I hope he’s enjoying his time in CenLa. He’s going to really enjoy summer here.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:20 pm to FLTech
You do realize that he’s going to lie and act like he was thrown in a gulag anyway right? When he does his media tour the people watching will be made to believe what happened to him was worse than what should’ve. Can’t believe you guys still don’t see the game.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:21 pm to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Your question is fair. It's unfortunate you have to qualify it with that.
As I reflect upon it now, I do find it a regrettable statement. But only because I neglected to recall your overall view and opinion of Trump (and by extension his supporters, perhaps with an exception or two amongst your personal orbit.
Let’s presume for a moment that you were the “average” Trump supporter on this board. In that case the point of my qualifier is to attempt to bypass a not-so-rare knee jerk reaction insofar as the erroneous presumption that with my post I’m somehow defending Comey. Catch my drift?
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:22 pm to Revelator
quote:
like getting Trump out of office by legitimate means
This doesn’t exist.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:26 pm to FLTech
Continue the investigation and see if he lies.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:26 pm to Revelator
quote:
And how would someone prove,” 86” meant kill, instead of one of its other meanings.
Sure, jimmy hoffa was 86'd means something else
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:27 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:
Continue the investigation and see if he lies.
Now that right there is probably the most astute remark made on the topic all day. That’s typically a “slam dunk” case/charge, and tags one a felon. Which if you’re going by his and his cohorts own standards, that’s a really, really, really, really bad thing to be labeled - as they preached endlessly about Trump.
This post was edited on 5/17/25 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:31 pm to Pelican fan99
Yea.. just like the didn’t riot with white ms13 gang members. Makes sense
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:32 pm to Revelator
quote:
Besides, nothing was done to people like Madonna who said she wanted to blow up the White House.
That’s the problem
Comey and/or his wife arranged the shells
Took the picture
And posted it
8647
Means assasinate Trump
Nothing else
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:38 pm to davyjones
quote:
Your question is fair. It's unfortunate you have to qualify it with that.
Well yeah, completely. That's why I posted that. You asked a reasonable question about wether or not Comey broke the law and around these parts, if you don't qualify a question like that by making it clear you find James Comey a shitbag, these folks will think you in some way support him.
I won't do that sort of thing. A fair question or a good point shouldn't have to be qualified like that.
Your question is fair. It's unfortunate you have to qualify it with that.
quote:
As I reflect upon it now, I do find it a regrettable statement. But only because I neglected to recall your overall view and opinion of Trump (and by extension his supporters, perhaps with an exception or two amongst your personal orbit.
Let’s presume for a moment that you were the “average” Trump supporter on this board. In that case the point of my qualifier is to attempt to bypass a not-so-rare knee jerk reaction insofar as the erroneous presumption that with my post I’m somehow defending Comey. Catch my drift?
Well yeah, completely. That's why I posted that. You asked a reasonable question about wether or not Comey broke the law and around these parts, if you don't qualify a question like that by making it clear you find James Comey a shitbag, these folks will think you in some way support him.
I won't do that sort of thing. A fair question or a good point shouldn't have to be qualified like that.
Posted on 5/17/25 at 3:45 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:
Continue the investigation and see if he lies.
What's he gonna lie about man? Do you think the Secret Service is gonna sweat something out of him, him and his team of lawyers?
Back to top


2





