- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/10/26 at 1:02 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
But his account is definitely not unbelievable either.
Yeah, but that's the problem.
People (I'm not necessarily saying you, just in general) have gotten to the point that all they need to accept a narrative is the idea that it would benefit the person being accused and deciding that the narrative is possible.
Sure, it's possible. But that's not evidence. That's just a pre-requisite for investigation. These days people just jump straight from "it's possible" to accepting whatever the narrative is.
I'm like the guy a few posts up. I think it's likely that Oswald colluded with someone.
But who he colluded with I have no idea and I don't think anyone else does either, they just insert their favorite villain into the narrative. It could have been any one or any combination of LBJ, the French, Israel, The Soviet Union, the mob, Cuba, the CIA, or just some other random lone nuts.
From AI:
quote:
Researchers who track conspiracy culture around the Assassination of John F. Kennedy generally find hundreds to thousands of individuals who have claimed some form of insider knowledge since 1963.
The chances that THIS guy on THIS YouTube video giving an interview 50 years after the fact is the one guy who knows something when hundreds or thousands of people who claimed to know before him didn't is approaching zero IMO.
My conclusion: nobody knows. Nobody that's talking, anyway.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 1:10 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
The chances that THIS guy on THIS YouTube video giving an interview 50 years after the fact is the one guy who knows something when hundreds or thousands of people who claimed to know before him didn't is approaching zero IMO.
He's not the only one, but you initially acted like you had never watched anybody like him.
Dude, you're entitled to your opinion. I have mine, too, and it doesn't hinge on this guy. But you need to stop acting like other people are intent on defending their position. If anything, that's what you've been doing.
If you really knew the facts surrounding the Warren Commission, for example, you should know that it was a complete sham.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 1:53 pm to KCT
LBJ, CIA (Dulles), Mafia
Oswald was a Patsy and Ruby destroyed the trail.
Rodo
Oswald was a Patsy and Ruby destroyed the trail.
Rodo
Posted on 3/10/26 at 2:02 pm to KCT
quote:
If anything, that's what you've been doing.
Oh bullshite. I didn't even give my position until my last post above.
All I've been doing is giving just a cursory glance at the subjects of these videos that have been offered as proof (which is more than the people posting them have apparently done) and then reporting what I found in a 6 second Google search.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 2:13 pm to KCT
Hell no; he was a patsy. Jack Ruby made damn sure he wouldn’t talk. There were definitely others involved.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 2:47 pm to KCT
CIA absolutely had him taken out
Posted on 3/10/26 at 2:58 pm to KCT
of course he did not act alone - however, he was involved which is why he was taken out by Ruby
Posted on 3/10/26 at 2:58 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:Right. But the evidence is in a very detailed story for which there are perhaps 100 ways to disprove. Yet elements of the story adhere more to the known facts than the official account. And there is no disproof.
Sure, it's possible. But that's not evidence
Now that doesn't mean that James Earl Files was the second shooter. It could be that he knows just what went down and is inserting himself into the story. But again, the story he relates affords far more details and opportunities to disapprove than something someone would normally concoct, out of hand.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 3:41 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:To correct the record, the Files video was not offered as proof of anything other than a story which adheres far more closely to known facts than the official narrative.
these videos that have been offered as proof
I'd not touched on this before, but Files claims the primary team was located in the Dal-Tex Building. The trajectory of shots from the Dal-Tex 3rd floor correspond much more closely to the JFK-Connally hit than does a 6th floor TSBD shot. As soon as you visit the site in person and view things from the supposed Oswald angle in the museum, it's obvious.
From the TSBD 6th Floor, the 1st shot angle is substantially downward, and even if JFK had been hit alone, it would have been nearly impossible without Oswald basically leaning out of the window. Though there is no way such a shot could have also hit Connally, we also have a movie frame showing the TSBD window less than a second from the first shot. No visible gunman. No protruding rifle.
If JFK and Connally had been wounded separately, and both had been leaning forward in their seats when they were struck, a TSBD sniper could account for those wounds. But with both Connally and JFK hit simultaneously, the trajectory is marked.
Further, the missed second shot that hit the curb far beyond the limo near the overpass would have been an impossibly bad miss from the TSBD perch. But, from the Dal Tex location the miss could have been a matter of inches over the top of JFK's head.
Again, that does not "prove" Files account. But it is far more in keeping with the facts. Notably, the Warren Commission used a four seat limo simulation excluding the middle jump seats to re-create the assassination. That was not accidental IMO.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 3:47 pm to Tangineck
Jack Ruby would have missed Oswald had Oswald not requested a change of clothes before transport.
Posted on 3/10/26 at 8:55 pm to KCT
It was the driver of the car, Secret Service Agent, William Greer who shot the kill shot.
William Cooper, Ex Naval Intelligence (was assassinated 2 months after 9/11). In June 2001, he correctly said on a national radio broadcast, that a large US City would be attacked very shortly and it would be wrongfully blamed on Osama Bin Ladin.
William Cooper, Ex Naval Intelligence (was assassinated 2 months after 9/11). In June 2001, he correctly said on a national radio broadcast, that a large US City would be attacked very shortly and it would be wrongfully blamed on Osama Bin Ladin.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 3/10/26 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 3/10/26 at 8:57 pm to Tammany Tom
William Cooper explaining on his national radio broadcast in June 2001 that an attack kn a major US city would shortly take place and be blamed on Osama bin Laden.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:03 pm to Tammany Tom
Netanyahu in 1995 stating that if the West doesn’t wake up then you’ll soon see militant islamists bringing down the World Trade Center’s.
Hmmmm..: how did he know this in 1995?
Hmmmm..: how did he know this in 1995?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:45 am to Tammany Tom
quote:Brilliant!
It was the driver of the car, Secret Service Agent, William Greer who shot the kill shot.
Those air pistols are the perfect weapon when the shooter needs to put extra English on his curveball shot.
Moment of impact (Nix Film)
Notice the Driver's position?

Posted on 3/11/26 at 9:57 am to Eldodroptop
That begs the question. If Oswald was so good, why did he fail to kill the General?
Posted on 3/11/26 at 11:55 am to Eldodroptop
quote:Yeah?
Oswald acted alone.
FWIW, on December 14, 1963 The Saturday Evening Post ran a piece titled "The Assassin," by Ben H. Bagdikian. He included a photo subcaptioned "A view from the sniper nest." It was shot from the 2nd Floor of the Dal-Tex Building.
This post was edited on 3/11/26 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 3/11/26 at 11:59 am to Tammany Tom
quote:
Tom
Netanyahu in 1995 stating that if the West doesn’t wake up then you’ll soon see militant islamists bringing down the World Trade Center’s.
Chris Matthews predicted the hijackings and all on Hardball back in the '90s.
Posted on 3/11/26 at 12:23 pm to Tammany Tom
quote:Perhaps because it had already been attempted in 1993?
Netanyahu in 1995 stating that if the West doesn’t wake up then you’ll soon see militant islamists bringing down the World Trade Center’s.
Hmmmm..: how did he know this in 1995?
Popular
Back to top



0




