- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you think black people are too stupid to get an ID
Posted on 4/5/21 at 5:52 am to DustyAnchor
Posted on 4/5/21 at 5:52 am to DustyAnchor
First, let’s start with the premise that every quadrant of the political landscape is littered with its share of drooling imbeciles. Second, let’s acknowledge that some percentage of those imbeciles will scream that Voter ID is somehow inherently racist. For God sake, those same people will tell you that maple syrup is “racist.“
with that understanding, can we also acknowledge that the largest portion of opposition to Voter ID arises not from the ridiculous non-argument found in the OP, but rather from the disparate impact of such a program?
The simple, objective fact is that extraordinarily poor people tend to be far less-likely to hold a valid, current government-issued ID than people in higher socio-economic strata. Without attempting to make any sort of values-based argument about the reasons, the simple objective fact is that Blacks are greatly over represented in those lower socio-economic strata, with the result being that proportionately-more blacks will have difficulty voting if such a program were implemented on a broad scale.
The ridiculous notion set forth in the OP plays no role whatsoever in this analysis.
personally, I do not particularly care. It is entirely possible to obtain a the requisite identification, for absolutely anyone. It takes a bit of effort, and it takes a bit of planning. This does not bother me. I do not want lazy people voting. I simply feel no need to rely upon ridiculous, hyperbolic arguments.
with that understanding, can we also acknowledge that the largest portion of opposition to Voter ID arises not from the ridiculous non-argument found in the OP, but rather from the disparate impact of such a program?
The simple, objective fact is that extraordinarily poor people tend to be far less-likely to hold a valid, current government-issued ID than people in higher socio-economic strata. Without attempting to make any sort of values-based argument about the reasons, the simple objective fact is that Blacks are greatly over represented in those lower socio-economic strata, with the result being that proportionately-more blacks will have difficulty voting if such a program were implemented on a broad scale.
The ridiculous notion set forth in the OP plays no role whatsoever in this analysis.
personally, I do not particularly care. It is entirely possible to obtain a the requisite identification, for absolutely anyone. It takes a bit of effort, and it takes a bit of planning. This does not bother me. I do not want lazy people voting. I simply feel no need to rely upon ridiculous, hyperbolic arguments.
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 5:59 am
Posted on 4/5/21 at 5:52 am to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:I'm going to start using this. Thanks.
Black people can get IDs just fine.
It’s a bit more challenging for people with outstanding warrants.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 5:54 am to johnsullivantd
quote:Never go full retard.
It is all about voter suppression.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 5:57 am to AggieHank86
quote:
with that understanding, can we also acknowledge that the largest portion of opposition to Voter ID arises not from the ridiculous non-argument found in the OP, but rather from the disparate impact of such a program?
No, that's not the way Democrats present it.
If we've heard it one time, we've heard it 5,000 times in the past 3 months - voter ID is racist. Period. Full stop.
Democrat leaders and the race-baiting hucksters repeatedly say so.
Democrats are not talking much about the elderly, or the handicapped. They present it as Jim Eagle, don't you know.
Your argument is a straw man, Hankster.
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 5:59 am
Posted on 4/5/21 at 6:07 am to BiteMe2020
You are arguing with the marketing, which is not an issue addressed in the OP. Is the marketing somewhat disingenuous? Yes, I would agree with that.
So is the marketing on the other side. I do not believe for one second that “election integrity” is the motivating factor on the Right. So long as a given procedure keeps them in office, neither the Left nor the Right is going to be lining up to dismantle that procedure.
In this case, the marketing ploy is to argue that a racially-disparate impact is automatically “racist.”
So is the marketing on the other side. I do not believe for one second that “election integrity” is the motivating factor on the Right. So long as a given procedure keeps them in office, neither the Left nor the Right is going to be lining up to dismantle that procedure.
In this case, the marketing ploy is to argue that a racially-disparate impact is automatically “racist.”
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 6:11 am
Posted on 4/5/21 at 6:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:Even if this is true, it's a bridge too far. Allowing pathways to fraud disenfranchises voters as well. Have security and lower barriers for legal citizens to obtain the credentials. Sorry, not sorry that some people may have difficulty getting an id. In general, I don't like government programs but I would fully support a program to help legal voters get an ID to vote (and transportation for that matter). Access to voting is not as important as maintaining the integrity of elections.
The simple, objective fact is that extraordinarily poor people tend to be far less-likely to hold a valid, current government-issued ID than people in higher socio-economic strata. Without attempting to make any sort of argument about the reasons, the simple objective fact is that Blacks are greatly over represented in those lower socio-economic strata, with the result being that proportionately-more blacks will have difficulty voting if such a program were implemented on a broad scale.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 6:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:
You are arguing with the marketing, which is not an issue addressed in the OP. Is the marketing somewhat disingenuous? Yes, I would agree with that.
So is the marketing on the other side. I do not believe for one second that “election integrity” is the motivating factor on the Right. So long as a given procedure keeps them in office, neither the Left nor the Right is going to be lining up to dismantle that procedure.
Nah, liberals fundamentally believe that black people are inferior. Can't get voter ID. Can't get into college. Can't be held to the same criminal standards, etc.
In politics, marketing just is the policy position.
If liberals don't want people to think that they are racist, maybe they should tone down their "marketing", lol.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 6:19 am to AggieHank86
quote:Old me would be offended that you said this. I just suggested that election integrity is THE ISSUE -- and in an ideal world it is. If there is one side who is using this to slant things it's the Democrats. They just did it and 'won' the Presidency.
So is the marketing on the other side. I do not believe for one second that “election integrity” is the motivating factor on the Right. So long as a given procedure keeps them in office, neither the Left nor the Right is going to be lining up to dismantle that procedure.
I will say it again: If Democrats want 'unity' then they have to address voter integrity -- an issue that half of Americans have a problem with. Their decision to vilify those of us who have this issue just speaks to their lustful desire for power and their deceitful calls for unity. Their cry of "Let's unify, racist" is bullshite.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 6:23 am to RoyalWe
quote:unlike the OP, you have just presented a rational argument in support of voter ID. Again, I do not believe that it is the actual underlying argument (which is purely political) but at least it is rational.
RoyalWe
Both the Left and the Right attempt to cloak their positions in arguments appealing to the masses. The right choose is “election integrity,” and the left chooses “racial equality.“ Both are full of shite. It is pure realpolitik.
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 6:30 am
Posted on 4/5/21 at 6:40 am to supadave3
quote:
quote:
It’s a bit more challenging for people with outstanding warrants
No it’s not. They’re totally different things. They absolutely do not check your criminal history for warrants when you get a DL or state ID.
I'm guessing that in most states that if you have a warrant because you didn't pay or show up to court for a moving violation, you cannot get a DL.
However, ANYONE who has the proper documentation (e.g., birth certificate, etc.) can get a state-issued I.D., and, if you are on public assistance you can typically get it for FREE.
Racist Dims have made the absurd argument that it is "harder" for blacks to obtain the proper documentation. This is just plain racist. Ask anyone who went through Katrina what it's like to get reissued copies of the legal documents they lost in the floods. It's a PAIN IN THE A$$. But, it's a pain in the A$$ for everyone.
But, and most importantly, in this day and age of identity theft, it SHOULD be difficult. And, the difficulty has NO RACIAL BIAS.
If Dims really believed the garbage they spew (THEY DON'T), they would actually be out there trying to help these blacks (that Dims believe are beyond f*cking ignorant) get copies of the required documentation so that they can get a valid DL or state-issue I.D.
But, this is all complete BULLSH!T and F*CKING LIES spewed by the Dims. ANYONE who want a state-issued I.D. card ALREADY HAS ONE. And they KNOW that Voter I.D. laws aren't about making it hard for blacks to votes -- they're about making it hard for Dims to engage in MASSIVE F*CKING VOTER FRAUD.
I've seen a Louisiana state-issued I.D. that wasn't a driver's license. Much like a learner's permit, it looks just like a DL except it is done in portrait mode rather than landscape mode.
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 7:15 am
Posted on 4/5/21 at 7:21 am to auggie
quote:Not very many Conservative Republican Whites rely upon the State for employment. It's not a conservative value to rely on the State.
In most cases, it is not that black people do not want to get an ID, but they find it hard to convince authorities to provide them with one, especially when those authorities are affiliated to a party that blacks do not typically vote for. It is all about voter suppression.
This is hilarious. When you go to get a DL or whatever, most of the clerks that you will talk to, will be Black people.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 7:22 am to AggieHank86
quote:
election integrity
How is wanting to make sure fraud doesn’t happen in an election “bull shite”?
Posted on 4/5/21 at 7:27 am to BiteMe2020
quote:
Nah, liberals fundamentally believe that black people are inferior. Can't get voter ID. Can't get into college. Can't be held to the same criminal standards, etc.
Don't forget standardized testing as well.
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 4/5/21 at 7:28 am to DustyAnchor
quote:
YOU ARE A RACIST
:shrug:
Posted on 4/5/21 at 7:29 am to Sidicous
quote:
Not very many Conservative Republican Whites rely upon the State for employment. It's not a conservative value to rely on the State.
The state of Alabama is a huge employer. Most of them are pretty conservative.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 7:34 am to RoyalWe
quote:You hate to see it.
Never go full retard.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 7:36 am to DustyAnchor
Left: You are a racist poopyhead!
Right: No, YOU are a racist poopyhead!
Right: No, YOU are a racist poopyhead!
Posted on 4/5/21 at 7:36 am to johnsullivantd
quote:
In most cases, it is not that black people do not want to get an ID, but they find it hard to convince authorities to provide them with one, especially when those authorities are affiliated to a party that blacks do not typically vote for.
Exactly. We have all seen the signs at the DMV! “No poor colored people”. I always wondered when someone would point this out. It’s especially prevalent in large urban areas. You know the towns. Places like Chicago, Boston, NYC, San Francisco, places notorious for sunset laws still being on the books. Places that just flat out don’t issue IDs so they can save money by not having to provide services for “those people”. The DMV is just the most visible version of the KKK DBA the state government in liberal states.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 7:41 am to johnsullivantd
quote:
In most cases, it is not that black people do not want to get an ID, but they find it hard to convince authorities to provide them with one, especially when those authorities are affiliated to a party that blacks do not typically vote for.
It is all about voter suppression.
I can’t recall the last time I saw a white person in the office when I was getting my license renewed. What are all those black people doing? In fact, it’s always mostly black people in any government office (in front of and behind the counter).
Posted on 4/5/21 at 7:41 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Left: You are a racist poopyhead!
Right: No, YOU are a racist poopyhead!
I suppose there is some truth to this... political discourse in DC has devolved to basically 3rd grade playground argument rhetoric. It's disgusting, since these people are supposed to be "leaders". Laughable.
However, liberals assume as a base assumption that blacks are inferior to even get their arguments off the ground.
The worst you can legitimately accuse the right of is tone deafness in underestimating the plight of poor people.
I can understand it. It's really hard to get an ID if you don't have the $0-$28 (depending on your state) and a ride to the DMV to get one.
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 7:42 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News