Started By
Message
locked post

If you force a Christian bakery to bake gay wedding cakes, it'll start a precedent

Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:19 pm
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:19 pm
That precedent being gay bakers can't complain or deny service when a Christian customer wants a cake that says Leviticus 20:13 on it.

Melting liberal bakers can't deny service to a normal American that wants a sheet cake with an image of Our President on it.

Jewish bakers can't deny service to a Neo-Nazi wanting a swastika case.

Muslim bakers of Pakistani descent can't deny service to Hindu Indian customers that want a "India is #1" written on their cake.

Either allow PRIVATE businesses to serve what they please or don't complain when it will be you having to do something you're uncomfortable with. Simple.

This post was edited on 6/16/18 at 1:20 pm
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:24 pm to
OTOH, legal discrimination in the market place promises to escalate to chaotic proportions. Merchants will decide who gets the best of their wares and who gets the leftovers. Discrimination is a door that can't be opened just a little to get at gay people.
Posted by Diary Queen
Member since Jul 2017
1402 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:24 pm to
But is it ok for a muslim woman to deny a brazilian bikini wax to a tranny?
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:25 pm to
This is why you have to serve everyone, period.
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:26 pm to
Private businesses should be private run.

Also what customer would want to support a business owner who has qualms about their lifestyle choices?

Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:26 pm to
Or you can afford people the right to refuse service for any reason. Period.
Posted by 03GeeTee
Oklahomastan
Member since Oct 2010
3423 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:28 pm to
The gay wedding cake case wasn’t about not serving someone. It was about creating a custom product with a specific message that they had the right to refuse doing.
This post was edited on 6/16/18 at 1:28 pm
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:29 pm to
Some part of a society has to be a neutral zone for it to function properly. For us that's the market place. When you offer something for sale, it needs to be available to everyone who can afford it. Nothing else will work.
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:30 pm to
Finally something we can agree on.

Right to refuse based on lifestyle because of religious beliefs are okay.

Right to refuse based on race I would never agree with it. You don't choose your race and discrimination on that factor is horrible.

However, if I'm running a wholesome family run bakery, and some wacko filth slumber in reeking of dog shite, no shoes on, etc.; I should be able to tell them to get out.

If you're a devout follower of the Good Book, you should not have to bake a gay wedding cake. You are not entitled to a wedding cake in the Constitution.
This post was edited on 6/16/18 at 1:32 pm
Posted by DevilDogTiger
RTWFY!
Member since Nov 2007
6627 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

But is it ok for a muslim woman to deny a brazilian bikini wax to a tranny?

Sure. Privately owed business

quote:

This is why you have to serve everyone, period.

Incorrect. This is why you don’t have to serve anyone, period.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Or you can afford people the right to refuse service for any reason.


That already exists and functions well. Some people want to change this right so that whole groups can be excluded, however. That's just wrong.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80875 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

This is why you have to serve everyone, period.


Masterpiece does serve everyone. The owner wouldn't make a custom cake with a message he found offensive.

Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

That already exists and functions well.


Thankfully the Supreme Court recently upheld that right. Too bad it had to.
This post was edited on 6/16/18 at 1:33 pm
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35326 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Discrimination is a door that can't be opened just a little to get at gay people.


Wutgun
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

You don't choose your race and discrimination on that factor is horrible.


You don't choose your sexuality either. Did you choose?
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
20205 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

The gay wedding cake case wasn’t about not serving someone. It was about creating a custom product with a specific message that they had the right to refuse doing.


Exactly, the baker in question said he would do anything else except creating a custom wedding cake.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Thankfully the Supreme Court recently upheld that right.


If you're referring to the Colorado case, then you're just plain wrong. The SC ruling had nothing to do with discrimination. The court essentially threw out the case because it determined that Colorado did not treat the defendant with respect.

He can be retried in Colorado.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

Exactly, the baker in question said he would do anything else except creating a custom wedding cake.


When this case, or another, comes back to the SC, you can expect the court to rule that wedding cakes are not art. Just because the baker used that excuse to deny the gay couple does not make his specific cakes artwork. In fact, expect the nine jurors to say that anything made for public sale and consumption does not constitute art.
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

You don't choose your sexuality either. Did you choose?


I've yet to see any credible hard science on that. I've seen too many girls saying "I'm going lesbian" to believe that.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Also what customer would want to support a business owner who has qualms about their lifestyle choices?



An agenda driven one looking for some of that "discrimination cash".
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram