Started By
Message

re: If you are on ANY government assistance, you should be required by Law to take..

Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:04 pm to
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
24230 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:04 pm to
Welfare/ food stamp assistance used to be a stigma. It’s to the point where people don’t give a shite about being on the government tit. I don’t have an issue with temporary assistance if you lose your job or really can’t work. It’s the perpetual life long stealing that pissed me off.



Posted by FLBooGoTigs1
Nocatee, FL.
Member since Jan 2008
59280 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

You mean you got paid to be in the military and then enjoyed handsome benefits that you would rather cut your own legs off than see other Americans receive?



Like I said you think you know everything. You don’t.


quote:

I serve my community every single day and I don’t need to carry weapons to do it


You drop your pants and let homeless guys frick you that’s you serving the community. We know your history
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 8:19 pm
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
196625 posts
Posted on 7/24/25 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

I serve my community every single day and I don’t need to carry weapons to do it.

I could say the same for what I did in the past three plus decades but you never acknowledge that I know what I'm talking about as far as the flaws with bureaucracy or what our system of government is founded upon

And you also accused me of emotional outbursts caused by brain damage against me, even though you know nothing about my neurological issues


so which is it?

you're a hypocrite
This post was edited on 7/24/25 at 8:31 pm
Posted by FLBooGoTigs1
Nocatee, FL.
Member since Jan 2008
59280 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 12:43 am to
quote:

And you also accused me of emotional outbursts caused by brain damage against me, even though you know nothing about my neurological issues


Like I said liberal women like 4cubbies think they know everything and looking at her responses it just shows her crazy.
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 12:47 am
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
196625 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 1:14 am to
Well, bedpan claimed because he was a murse that he knew I had the vax shot even though I was hospitalized for my stroke a year and a 1/2 before the shot was ever created.

So there is at least one stupid conservative who claims to be male for every liberal woman.
Posted by FLBooGoTigs1
Nocatee, FL.
Member since Jan 2008
59280 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 1:22 am to
I don't deny there are idiots on both sides.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10711 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 2:35 am to
quote:


Have you estimated what the cost would be to implement this? Is that worth further increasing our debt to make you feel better about poor strangers getting welfare?
Privacy•A


less than what it takes now

You care about "privacy"? Pay your own way and you can do whatever you want that is legal.

That is the same stupid logic as democrats whining about the cost of border enforcement.

Both get in the way of leftists buying votes with other peoples' money.

Go frick yourself.
Posted by TutHillTiger
Mississippi Alabama
Member since Sep 2010
49830 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 3:09 am to
How about birth control
Posted by AUJACK
Member since Sep 2020
1394 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 4:10 am to
quote:

Random or monthly Drug Screens.


I don't think that monthly drug screens for 100% recipients of welfare is feasible. If it decided to drug test them all then I am opening a testing lab and investing all my money in drug testing labs.

I do think that a random drug screen of a certain percentage is certainly possible. As a former program manager of a defense contract of 200 to 250 employees, PhD's, engineers, physicist, computer scientist weenies, technicians etc,, random testing of 10% every month was part of the contract. The duration of the contract, 6 years, I only had to let go of 2 employees for testing hot.

What did bother me was that the government employees were subject to drug testing but never drug tested. I think it would be beneficial to randomly drug all government employees. It would be a great way to rid of the bloat.
Posted by theballguy
HSV (Dealing only in satire)
Member since Oct 2011
37323 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 5:46 am to
More fantasy. It usually has the word "should" in there somewhere.

Nothing.

W
I
L
L

Happen.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 5:52 am to
quote:

Have you estimated what the cost would be to implement this? Is that worth further increasing our debt to make you feel better about poor strangers getting welfare?


Yes. It’s less than the cost of electing shitbag Democrats who let 20 million illegals into the US to destroy western civilization.

Thanks for asking.
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
15060 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:25 am to
quote:

Who's paying that $1B new expense?
It more than pays for itself with all the drug-addled leeches that are kicked off the government dole!

Just yesterday, I had a 34 y/o patient. 5'4", 384 lb female with a history of STDs. Multiple tattoos and bright red dyed hair. She is on Medicaid and probably every other welfare benefit. UNEMPLOYED! All of her health issues were directly linked to her morbid obesity and lifestyle choices. In her H&P, she admitted to being a consistent recreational drug user, and consumed a lot of alcohol. Poor people in other countries don't typically have a morbid obesity problem, but here it is an epidemic!

She was there to see me to get more free shite.
Posted by NoSaint
Member since Jun 2011
12693 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:30 am to
quote:

Have you estimated what cost savings would be incurred when a large percentage of free loaders are knocked off the government tit?


Ultimately there have been models of cost vs savings that seem like terrible ROI

Whether accurate or not, I won’t claim to be the expert but they’ve floated around with the percentage on drugs being much lower than expected and it essentially turning into just giving the same money to a testing corporation


Again, whether those models are accurate, I haven’t pursued the topic meaningfully
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
15060 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:37 am to
quote:

Social safety nets lol. This is what YOU refer them as. They were supposed to help people out short term situations but these people you defend have chosen to settle for a free handout and depend on a government that rewards them for their laziness.
Preach! I have relatives in another State that are the definition of trash. Welfare leeches, trailer park living, able-bodied, lazy arse bums that keep having kids. DHR has is also a presence in their life.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91563 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:43 am to
quote:

Please can we not waste more government money on drug testing
What if it saved us money?
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
24717 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 7:12 am to
quote:

The moment this gets brought up, you will be called a racist.


Whats crazy is that it's not longer even a racial issue. People of all races take government assistance just because they can.
Posted by BuckPshrink
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Member since Dec 2018
270 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 7:18 am to
Tie the requirements to labor itself: required to accept appropriate wages for delivered labor when offered. Many landscaping & domestic positions opening soon!
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 7:54 am to
quote:

What if it saved us money?


It won't. Tests are cheap. Paying for the infrastructure and staffing around testing everyone is expensive. A simple Google search shows how many times this has been tried and failed already. 30-40k per person is what it averages out to be.

This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 7:55 am
Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
23173 posts
Posted on 7/25/25 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Where would they be getting money for drugs?


Theft is usually the method of choice
Posted by tadman
Member since Jun 2020
5445 posts
Posted on 7/26/25 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Historically, that hasn’t been the case when this has been tried in various states.


And you are assuming that the surveys are not self-serving surveys, which has been shown to be grossly wrong lately. If you can present data from a truly non-biased source I'm interested but I dont' think you can. Most survey takers, especially when funded by a government agency, are very self serving.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram