- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Trump wins, takes office without issue, and gets 4 years, is the black pill dead?
Posted on 10/20/24 at 10:39 am to scottydoesntknow
Posted on 10/20/24 at 10:39 am to scottydoesntknow
quote:
Of course there are people pulling strings. Whenever there have been advanced societies, there have been people pulling strings behind the scenes.
Indeed.
And where there is a massive budget and the worlds greatest accumulation of power, there will be more incentive to pull strings.
this is common sense, Autists dont understand things that require intuition.
1
Posted on 10/20/24 at 10:43 am to retooc
quote:
I ain't finna read all the shite
As a selfless service to the board, I read the entire spiel and here is a graphic summary of SFP’s Grand Thesis:
It was a thankless task but I always place my service to the board above my own petty concerns.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 10:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Is this your way of admitting that the Marc Elias efforts are, in fact, lawfare? It's okay to agree. It won't detract from your reputation, I promise you.
So the GOP actually filing similar election suits isn't?
Posted on 10/20/24 at 10:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Again. Strawman
How? Your posting history is out there for all to see. Are you now attempting to be unburdened by what has been?
quote:
Primarily because MAGA is more big government compared to what I want. Technically that makes me more anti-Dc establishment than MAGA
I see. So since you spend most of your time on this board going after Trump, in SFP’s perfect world, who would the ideal “anti-establishment” candidate be?
Quite the contrary, while I do believe you no doubt to be a very intelligent and well-read individual, you in fact consistently present yourself on this board as one who is very trusting and takes at face value the word of the authorities and bureaucracy in charge.
Had there been a Colonial era Tiger Droppings, I would fully expect Colonial SFP to have been a Loyalist.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 10:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Project 2025 was trying to work to help Trump work to combat it and/or work for him. But people pretend that has nothing to do with Trump now
This is what SFP does and it’s very obvious. Creates a thread and then brings up Project 2025 within the first page to see if anyone bites. This is the 4th topic started by him where he does this on the first page.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 10:54 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
He is literally the most narcissistic person I've come across, and I used to deal with a lot of celebrities.
He set the bar very high for autistic fricks who think very highly of themselves.
I honestly can’t decide if SFP genuinely believes he exists on some higher intellectual level than the rest of us thick-browed Neanderthals or is simply a troll who believes we are too stupid to recognize his clown act for what it is. Whatever the case, SFP certainly holds himself in the highest regard.
This post was edited on 10/20/24 at 11:13 am
Posted on 10/20/24 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Project 2025 was trying to work to help Trump work to combat it and/or work for him. But people pretend that has nothing to do with Trump now
Is this y'alls new conspiracy theory?
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:06 am to RogerTheShrubber
119 people downvoted this topic by the boards "Smartest guy in the room".
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:06 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
I was just going to post the pic of the line drawing guy on a bulletin board. this is even better. SFP-sex trafficking isn't real and neither is the devil.
this is for SFP
Agenda 47 Since he likes to try the dems talking points. Let him melt over this.
This post was edited on 10/20/24 at 11:13 am
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:07 am to cajunangelle
quote:
While this is correct. Don't convolute normal peoples thoughts with this mess.
I'm not. I'm specifically targeting TBP types.
quote:
Why don't you start a thread with discussion of Trump not using the norms of the federal govt as his transition team operates? This is by far worth the time instead of the black pill convoluted of 4chan nuts---- nonsense.
This thread will be referential and posted when TBP types make threads similar to the ones found in OP, to allow them to defend themselves and take a stance on the question in OP.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:08 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
RogerTheShrubber
SFP is the textbook case of how autistic savants often view anyone who challenges their worldview with utter disdain.
When SFP is rightly called out for his inconsistencies, prevarications and dissembling, SFP invariably claims it is because we are too feeble-minded to follow his intricate arguments.
Once you understand this mindset, almost every single thread he participates in follows a predictable pattern.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:08 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
Is this your way of admitting that the Marc Elias efforts are, in fact, lawfare? I
No. It's implicating the GOP in lawfare if his lawsuits are lawfare.
I don't know what lawfare is, still, so I'm using these 2 concrete examples for those proposing it exists to define the parameters.
Care to answer the questions now?
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
No -- you're assuming that the online narrative process is responsive to changes in the underlying reality. But this is only true in a very loose sense. In the synthetic age, simulationalism has become subjugated to narrativism. The details may change and the plot may evolve, but the ending of the story they are telling each other will stay the same.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:09 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
I honestly can’t decide if SFP genuinely believes he exists on some higher intellectual level t
Its massive insecurity. Someone said its because he's embarrassed of his upbringing, which makes sense as he puts more stock in his peers views than his own.
That makes perfect sense. Secure people dont go around telling others how rich or how smart they are. Pretenders do.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:10 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
Your posting history is out there for all to see.
And it does not reflect your extrapolations from which you then argued.
quote:
So since you spend most of your time on this board going after Trump, in SFP’s perfect world, who would the ideal “anti-establishment” candidate be?
There isn't one currently, but Rand Paul (who MAGA hated in 2016) is probably the closest.
quote:
you in fact consistently present yourself on this board as one who is very trusting and takes at face value the word of the authorities and bureaucracy in charge.
You're spinning me asking for evidence of conspiracies claimed by these participants.
quote:
Had there been a Colonial era Tiger Droppings, I would fully expect Colonial SFP to have been a Loyalist.
I likely would have been out in the woods on my own.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:10 am to texag7
quote:
This is what SFP does and it’s very obvious. Creates a thread and then brings up Project 2025 within the first page to see if anyone bites.
No.
And as proof, the thread continued with everyone understanding the point until you just tried to interject it in 10 pages later with a bad interpretation.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:11 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
I honestly can’t decide if SFP genuinely believes he exists on some higher intellectual level than the rest of us thick-browed Neanderthals or is a simply a troll who believes we are too stupid to recognize his clown act for what it is. Whatever the case, SFP certainly holds himself in the highest regard.
Says the guy who is scared to answer simple questions to defend his positions.
The ironing is thick.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:14 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
When SFP is rightly called out for his inconsistencies, prevarications and dissembling, SFP invariably claims it is because we are too feeble-minded to follow his intricate arguments.
Insecure people without proper coping mechanisms tend to believe they are always right when people disagree, because they just believe they are smarter.
You can have a high IQ, be a total nerd and still be functionally retarded when it comes to subjective things..
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:14 am to TxTiger82
quote:
No -- you're assuming that the online narrative process is responsive to changes in the underlying reality.
I'm not really assuming they will act logically.
They're going to keep up the ruse/charade. It's like people who commit to cults for so long, realize the bullshite, but can't leave b/c of how embarrassing it would be.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Says the guy who is scared to answer simple questions to defend his positions.
The ironing is thick.
Says the lying sack-of-excrement who denied he supported the lockdowns in New Orleans during the start of the COVID-1984 pandemic. And presented with evidence he did, simply locks down on the lie.
See how that works?
This post was edited on 10/20/24 at 11:16 am
Page 11 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News