- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Trump wins, takes office without issue, and gets 4 years, is the black pill dead?
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:53 am to Toomer Deplorable
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:53 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Listen you lying sack-of-sh*+, NO amount of “pertinent” questions changes the fact you came out in support of the lockdowns in New Orleans after the fact
None of this is true.
Literally none of it.
You posted a picture earlier that literally proves that nothing you said is true
quote:
But bump away as I enjoy seeing you bring attention to instances of your own dissembling! You will simply deny you said what you said!
You did not agree to answer the questions.
This post was edited on 10/20/24 at 11:54 am
Posted on 10/20/24 at 11:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It changed over time
Its always been Fauci.
In this thread YOU started about a secret cabal, you fricking still blew it.
MAGA blamed this secret cabal using Fauci as their ringleader, and you still dont get it.
If you said MAGA blamed Joe incorrectly for inflation, you would be right. But youre wrong.
This post was edited on 10/20/24 at 11:55 am
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:02 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Ad homs are so boring. SFP asked an interesting question. Do you have thoughts or do you just want to talk shite because you don't like lawyers?
Well goose/gander. Ad hominem attacks are SFP’s stock and trade when other posters call him out for his B.S.
This thread doesn’t exist in a vacuum: SFP has a long posting history here. If you are operating under the delusion that SFP is here for an honest discussion of ideas, you do so at the expense of your own credibility.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:04 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
when other posters call him out for his B.S.
SFP is confused over covid "medical" response and covid bailouts, and his little lackey is confused with him, evidently.
This post was edited on 10/20/24 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:05 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
SFP has a long posting history here
You're telling this to a person who knows this more than you.
quote:
If you are operating under the delusion that SFP is here for an honest discussion of ideas, you do so at the expense of your own credibility.
More ad homs
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You did not agree to answer the questions.
All the questions about your support of COVID-1984 lockdowns have been addressed. And the ultimate answer to those questions is that you are a lying sack-of-sh*+.

Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're telling this to a person who knows this more than you.
Well, as I indicated, that poster then loses all credibility by acting as if you are some disinterested, neutral observer to the discussions we have here daily.
quote:
More ad homs
More dissembling
See how that works?
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:26 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Thank you for posting another picture showing how I was against lockdowns and my specific concern was lockdowns.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
You stated:
quote:Yet, you also state:
No. It's implicating the GOP in lawfare
quote:These two statements show the incongruence of your continued statements about this topic, so, why don't you just sit this out?
I don't know what lawfare is
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
Didn’t read all of that, but because it’s you just DV.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:47 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
These two statements show the incongruence of your continued statements about this topic,
They do not. You just left off the important part to be dishonest.
Why did you not quote
quote:
so I'm using these 2 concrete examples for those proposing it exists to define the parameters.
Based on the vague/malleable version of "lawfare" (which, "No. It's implicating the GOP in lawfare" referenced), you need to explain how one can be "lawfare" and the other cannot. That or the GOP engages in "lawfare", too.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This thread will be referential
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Thank you for posting another picture showing how I was against lockdowns and my specific concern was lockdowns.
You failed to mention that you had falsely claimed that you voiced those concerns before the lockdown orders were in effect.
Yet rather than say you remembered incorrectly, we get your typical evasion.
But thank you for proving you regularly dissemble and prevaricate when presented with irrefutable evidence of your B.S.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
About to break 150 DVs!!!
Congrats man! That is friggin awesome.
Congrats man! That is friggin awesome.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 12:59 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
You failed to mention that you had falsely claimed that you voiced those concerns before the lockdown orders were in effect.
No you already proved that I did. I'll re-post the proof
Post is pre-lockdown and clearly shows my concerns over lockdowns.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 1:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
I just want to thank you for taking time out of your busy Sunday to educate and enlighten us heathens. Thank you.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 1:02 pm to TheOcean
No problem
Hopefully after Trump wins the insanity decreases and people come back to reality and stop promoting clear silliness.
Efforts like these are a means to bring people back to reality and to return this board to where it used to be in terms of discussion/rhetoric.
Hopefully after Trump wins the insanity decreases and people come back to reality and stop promoting clear silliness.
Efforts like these are a means to bring people back to reality and to return this board to where it used to be in terms of discussion/rhetoric.
Posted on 10/20/24 at 1:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Efforts like these are a means to bring people back to reality
Posted on 10/20/24 at 1:07 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Tweedle Dumb and Tweedle Dumber
Posted on 10/20/24 at 1:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'll re-post the proof
And still you are locking down on it. As I said, when presented with irrefutable evidence that you were wrong, rather than admit you remembered incorrectly, you simply lockdown on the lie.
You are a proven pathological liar and gas-lighting specialist of the first order! Thanks again for reaffirming my point!
Popular
Back to top



1





