- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If there really is child porn on the laptop, is Rudy in trouble for showing it?
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:55 pm
He keeps showing reporters and many are even hoping he made a copy of the hard drive before the FBI took it just in case the FBI "loses" it.
My question is this: would Rudy be in MAJOR trouble if there really is child pornography on it and he keeps showing all these reporters and even potentially making a copy of it? Seems that would be a giant arse no-no, right?
My question is this: would Rudy be in MAJOR trouble if there really is child pornography on it and he keeps showing all these reporters and even potentially making a copy of it? Seems that would be a giant arse no-no, right?
17
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:56 pm to TDsngumbo
No
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:56 pm to TDsngumbo
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 11:46 pm
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:56 pm to TDsngumbo
He's probably exempt as an officer of the court if it's related to a case.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:56 pm to TDsngumbo
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:56 pm to TDsngumbo
He show it here? A party? Times Square?
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:56 pm to TDsngumbo
Dont care. I just need to know if Joe is done
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:57 pm to TDsngumbo
For all practical purposes this is complete horseshite until Hunter is in handcuffs. If there really was CP on this laptop he’d be arrested by now.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:57 pm to TDsngumbo
Hes a lawyer, a former prosecutor, and a former attorney general, mayor, and the current counsel to the president.
Do you really think he'd make a mistake like that?
Do you really think he'd make a mistake like that?
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:57 pm to TDsngumbo
Not as long as he is trying to get something done about it, and using it as evidence.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:57 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:
No
How? Is it because he's an attorney and has some kind of special clearance to show it? I'm with the rest of the board and pray this is all true so Trump can have a better chance, obviously, but I still have my doubts this is real.
I'm ignorant to many of the laws that would pertain to this specific situation so I'm genuinely asking to learn.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:58 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
If there really is child porn on the laptop, is Rudy in trouble for showing it?
I think it's a felony if law enforcement take possession of material evidence showing criminal activity and does not act on it.
Wray needs to be fired immediately. Delaware state police need to be investigated. The FBI needs to be investigated. They've had this information for a year and nothing has come of it. People need to be fired and put in jail SOON.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:58 pm to TDsngumbo
I would assume any pictures of minors are redacted enough to ensure they are protected. Everything else is fair game.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:59 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
My question is this: would Rudy be in MAJOR trouble if there really is child pornography on it and he keeps showing all these reporters and even potentially making a copy of it?
I'm not a legal expert by any means, but it would seem to me that he would be in trouble if he published it. Verifying it with media outlets?
I trust Rudy knows what he's doing. He's sorta whip smart on the law I think.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 12:59 pm to tilco
quote:
If there really was CP on this laptop he’d be arrested by now.
By whom? The FBI? The same FBI that helped organize a coup on our sitting POTUS? The same FBI that fabricated evidence against a sitting POTUS? Or what about the Delaware police that once given the information, immediately gave it back to that same FBI.
No one is going to be arrested, if the guilty party is a Democrat. Those are the facts of life now.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 1:00 pm to TDsngumbo
I said it yesterday, it all depends on what he's actually doing with it.
Speaking to law enforcement and prosecutors and handing it over to them? He's fine as long as he doesn't keep a copy of it himself.
Showing actual videos or images to reporters? He could possibly be in trouble for that.
Context is everything and we don't know the answers to any of those questions as to what he's actually doing with them. Rudy isn't a dummy so I'm guessing he's covering his arse.
Speaking to law enforcement and prosecutors and handing it over to them? He's fine as long as he doesn't keep a copy of it himself.
Showing actual videos or images to reporters? He could possibly be in trouble for that.
Context is everything and we don't know the answers to any of those questions as to what he's actually doing with them. Rudy isn't a dummy so I'm guessing he's covering his arse.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 1:06 pm to BugAC
quote:
No one is going to be arrested, if the guilty party is a Democrat. Those are the facts of life now.
This is starting to sound like the infamous Hillary & Huma video. "It's horrific, vile stuff. 30 year vets of the NYPD threw up when they saw it. Some guys even killed themselves over it because they couldn't live with the guilt. But darn it, we just can't find anybody in the whole country to actually prosecute it"
Posted on 10/21/20 at 1:15 pm to Tantal
quote:
He's probably exempt as an officer of the court if it's related to a case.
This isn't correct. There are ZERO exemptions. Even for attorneys of those being prosecuting. The Feds have threatened and even attempted to prosecute attorneys for having the evidence or trying to use it to defend their clients. All of that has to be done under protective order.
Rudy sharing the drives knowing it contained potential illegal child photos would be distribution and easily prosecuted under the law if the Feds wanted to.
This has been an effort by federal prosecutors to make it nearly impossible to defend these cases. Similar to how they manage drug minimums, etc.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 1:17 pm to TDsngumbo
The only problem I can see for him is how long he knew about these underage girl pictures but didn't turn it over to the cops until now.
Posted on 10/21/20 at 1:17 pm to RealDawg
quote:
This isn't correct. There are ZERO exemptions. Even for attorneys of those being prosecuting. The Feds have threatened and even attempted to prosecute attorneys for having the evidence or trying to use it to defend their clients. All of that has to be done under protective order.
Rudy sharing the drives knowing it contained potential illegal child photos would be distribution and easily prosecuted under the law if the Feds wanted to.
This has been an effort by federal prosecutors to make it nearly impossible to defend these cases. Similar to how they manage drug minimums, etc.
I tried saying this yesterday but was yelled at. Possession is illegal, period. The only ones with immunity are the prosecutor and agent handling the case, and even then it is in a tightly controlled environment.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News