- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Goldberg is correct & theses were classified or highly sensitive messages, he is guilty
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:16 pm to VOR
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:16 pm to VOR
quote:
More significantly, the participants won’t acknowledge the screw up and assure us that steps are being taken to correct the problem or
Lies. Mike waltz did exactly this.
And I still think he should be fired.
But you are a god damn liar
You and roger
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:16 pm to Kraut Dawg
quote:
The question is, was the info classified or was it not?
It was absolutley classified information, that's not really in question outside of X and far right message boards like this one.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:19 pm to mwade91383
quote:
It was absolutley classified information
Then you agree that Goldberg should spend decades in prison?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:22 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Then you agree that Goldberg should spend decades in prison?
You can't be serious

Is this you????
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:25 pm to RiverCityTider
The info isn't classified but I hope Hegseth has learned to quit acting like a frat boy texting out his latest sorority score. Be professional and keep military shite in classified channels.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:25 pm to SallysHuman
TG lied under oath yesterday (nothing will happen to her) and now today is admitting it was a mistake. This administration has been looking like idiots the last few weeks.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:27 pm to mwade91383
Again, that tweet sucks.
He has taken a screenshot of part of a page that's in a 100+ page document.
The info itself has to be classified by someone. Prob delegated by the sec of def.
He has taken a screenshot of part of a page that's in a 100+ page document.
The info itself has to be classified by someone. Prob delegated by the sec of def.
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:27 pm to shinerfan
Sure. I agree with that. He should have recused himself the moment he knew.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:29 pm to onepiecemayne
quote:
They should both resign.
so the SOD should resign because he was thought he was in a confidential setting but wasn't?
You voted for Harris didn't you?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:30 pm to dalefla
It aint classified anymore but that shite was textbook classified information.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:31 pm to ApexTiger
No because he's an idiot. No I didn't vote for sleepy Joe biden either. I can call shite out when I see it unlike most of y'all.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:31 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I wondered about that... staying in a situation you've not got security clearance for without notifying them seems a wee bit shady.
He said he thought it was a prank because why would senior cabinet members be chatting about impending military action on Signal and why would he be invited to that chat?
If someone invited you to a chat claiming to be the VP, would you believe it?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:31 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Again, that tweet sucks.
Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it's not true.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:32 pm to mwade91383
Just pointing out your mindless hypocrisy. Are you really too stupid to grasp that Goldberg's actions were criminal? Whoever brought him in may or may not have broken the law. We don't know. But we know Goldberg is a criminal. And we knew he was a lying scumbag long before this faux scandal
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:33 pm to RiverCityTider
They wont do anything to him. Just like they didnt do anything when Hillary gave classified info on her bathroom server to her attorneys from them to pull out the "personal" stuff before turning over to Comey.
Two tiers of justice.
Two tiers of justice.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:33 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
He said he thought it was a prank
So clearly he walks right into it.
quote:
If someone invited you to a chat claiming to be the VP, would you believe it?
No, and I'd act like i believed it, ignore it, and find a better use of my time.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:34 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Just pointing out your mindless hypocrisy. Are you really too stupid to grasp that Goldberg's actions were criminal? Whoever brought him in may or may not have broken the law. We don't know. But we know Goldberg is a criminal. And we knew he was a lying scumbag long before this faux scandal
All you've pointed out is you don't have a clue what you're talkign about.
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:35 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
He said he thought it was a prank because why would senior cabinet members be chatting about impending military action on Signal and why would he be invited to that chat?
When he figured it out why didn't he alert, notify, retreat? This guy apparently has a history of shenanigans, I doubt it was "oops" on his part- and even if it were, the moment he figured it out he could have chosen to do the right thing.... or, record it and post it and gloat over it.
quote:He has far more access and contacts than a nobody like me, different kettle of fish entirely.
If someone invited you to a chat claiming to be the VP, would you believe it?
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:35 pm to shinerfan
quote:
Are you really too stupid to grasp that Goldberg's actions were criminal?
someone shoved classified/sensitive information in his face and you think the person who unknowingly saw the sensitive info shoved in his face should be prosecuted. ids this correct?
This post was edited on 3/26/25 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 3/26/25 at 4:37 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
someone shoved classified/sensitive information in his face and you think the person who unknowingly saw the sensitive info shoved in his face should be prosecuted. ids this correct?
Didn’t he copy/screenshot the material and then share it with the wide world of errbody? He's no victim.
Popular
Back to top
