- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Ford just made up her story ...
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:05 pm to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:05 pm to Vacherie Saint
There is some erstwhile political zealot in this thing between Palo Alto and Washington DC who is going to have been involved in this fabrication who is going to screw up somehow and spill the beans.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:06 pm to N.O. via West-Cal
quote:
Would such uncorroborated allegations of robbery be sufficient to require additional Senate hearings?
Nope. Not for $10 out of a purse.
But sexual assault is more serious. What about if he grabbed her purse, dragged her to the ground, and took $100,000?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:06 pm to VOR
quote:
Let’s be clear, nobody on this board, regardless of politics, knows what’s true and what’s not with this shite show.
What a useless mental surrender. Anyone can accuse anyone of the most disgusting crimes, no matter how damaging, and liberals get to shrug their shoulders and say "well, I guess we'll never know the truth".
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:08 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
You seemed to have missed my posts:
quote:
I'd like to hear your opinion on Karen Monahan's allegations. I'm sure you have one, since you are consistent in calling out allegations of assault by politicians, right?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:09 pm to Centinel
She isn't missing anything.
Ford/Kavanaugh is clearly the hill she wants to die on.
Ford/Kavanaugh is clearly the hill she wants to die on.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:11 pm to Vacherie Saint
Well of course. I just like rubbing proggy's noses in their own shite.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:15 pm to Vacherie Saint
I’m certain that what I posted is correct. GFY
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:16 pm to Centinel
How many times do you think you'll have to call texdiddler out before he looks up who you are talking about, claims some half arse support for her, and then resumes his Kavanaugh obsession? 
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:16 pm to VOR
I guess we'll never know the truth about you being a giant pedo. Just another one of life's great mysteries.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:17 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
How many times do you think you'll have to call texdiddler out before he looks up who you are talking about, claims some half arse support for her, and then resumes his Kavanaugh obsession?
He won't. Because he thinks Ellison is innocent. If people like him didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have any standards at all.
Progressive Ideology 101.
This post was edited on 9/19/18 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:21 pm to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
The content of the witnesses statement doesn't matter. Why does she make up a witness in the first place, who will then have the chance to invalidate your story?
quote:
I thought you were serious. I am embarrassed that I fell for it. Good job, you
I'm embarrassed for you too that you don't see what the content of the witnesses statement doesn't matter in the context of the original question asked.
If she's making up her story why would she include an eye-witness who is a friend of her attacker, when she can just leave him out?
As far as her decision as to whether to include the witness in her story or not, she anticipates if the witness will be good or bad for her, and then includes him in her story or not, accordingly.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:23 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
You seemed to have missed my posts:
quote:
I'd like to hear your opinion on Karen Monahan's allegations. I'm sure you have one, since you are consistent in calling out allegations of assault by politicians, right?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:23 pm to texridder
quote:BUT SHE DIDN'T, DUMBASS!
She would be talking about her being sexually assaulted
THAT'S THE POINT!
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:24 pm to TheSexecutioner
quote:
She did indeed subtract 2 witnesses from the room for exactly the reason you suggested of having fewer witnesses to refute.
You don't get it. Why include any witnesses at all?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:25 pm to texridder
Are you still white knighting for this lady
You libs are incredible
You libs are incredible
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:26 pm to texridder
quote:
texridder
You still seemed to have missed my posts:
quote:
I'd like to hear your opinion on Karen Monahan's allegations. I'm sure you have one, since you are consistent in calling out allegations of assault by politicians, right?
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:27 pm to texridder
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 4:11 am
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:33 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
Kavanaugh won't be confirmed. Someone else will be nominated.
That wasn't a prediction. Read the post I was responding to.
Posted on 9/19/18 at 6:36 pm to texridder
quote:
You don't get it. Why include any witnesses at all?
Because it will help dumbasses like you believe it, and say things like "why would she list witnesses then?"
Popular
Back to top


0








