- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Drag Queens intentions are pure, why don't they simply wear their everyday clothes
Posted on 6/16/22 at 10:59 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 6/16/22 at 10:59 am to AggieHank86
quote:
So, 12 events at preschools in New York. NY is approximately 7% of the US population
First, that extrapolation is not supported by the evidence presented. Even presenting it shows you have no interest in discussion ( and this is not a debate)
Second, no one is discussing whether we should expend large amounts of money to build a program to eradicate the occurrences. They are discussing whether public accommodations should be used for the programs and whether the programs in any form are worthwhile or even being harmful. The number of occurrences are completely itrelevant
If you did want to make a numerical conclusion then JJdoc showed evidence of increasing occurrences
0
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:01 am to AggieHank86
IOW,
They are making a conscious attempt to gain acceptance of kids.
Drag queens are notorious drug addicts. This is not healthy.
But it goes further, the new drag kids show on discovery is evidence of their actual goals.
Since rupaul and his show gained more acceptance kids were targeted next.
Now you have prepubescent boys dancing in slut women clothes for adults.
This is totally normal behavior. There is no slippery slope.
After this round of normalization/desensitization, which group is next in your estimation?
Or is this it?
Furries are likely next but they are also drug addled freaks.
They are making a conscious attempt to gain acceptance of kids.
Drag queens are notorious drug addicts. This is not healthy.
But it goes further, the new drag kids show on discovery is evidence of their actual goals.
Since rupaul and his show gained more acceptance kids were targeted next.
Now you have prepubescent boys dancing in slut women clothes for adults.
This is totally normal behavior. There is no slippery slope.
After this round of normalization/desensitization, which group is next in your estimation?
Or is this it?
Furries are likely next but they are also drug addled freaks.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 11:03 am
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:03 am to Flats
Somewhere out there, Shorty Rob is smiling.....
In his honor I present:
AggieHank Conservative Man of Principle and Frank DiPrima, Man of virtue...
In his honor I present:
AggieHank Conservative Man of Principle and Frank DiPrima, Man of virtue...
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:06 am to oogabooga68
Back to the topic at hand: There is no reasonable explanation as to why these people feel the need to dress like Freaks in front of children.
Saying they just want to help kids is an answer only an idiot of a groomer would even begin to entertain.
The Alphabet people and Dragons I knew would not DREAM of acting or dressing this way in front of kids.
We are dealing with a whole new generation of Government and culturally supported evil here.
Saying they just want to help kids is an answer only an idiot of a groomer would even begin to entertain.
The Alphabet people and Dragons I knew would not DREAM of acting or dressing this way in front of kids.
We are dealing with a whole new generation of Government and culturally supported evil here.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:07 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:I assume that you mean the one-dimensional political spectrum, with "conservative" on the right end and "liberal" on the left end?
Have you ever labeled yourself along that spectrum?
Even as a college kid, I always understood that my views do not "map" well on that sort of spectrum, and I was ecstatic when I found the work of David Nolan. Mapping political views in two dimensions just provides so much more clarity and usefulness.
If FORCED to use the one dimension, I suppose that I would say I am just a tic Right of Center, with my views on the limited role of government being somewhat stronger than my social views.
I find the above version of the Nolan chart to be accessible and useful. My views tend to chart a bit below the letter "B" in "American Libertarianism." I am certainly nowhere NEAR the anarchist that some seem to demand in libertarianism. Government certainly has a proper role. That role is just more limited than the current norm.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:08 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:It was going to come from someone, and if I had to bet upon "from whom" I would have won the bet.
I almost changed that word because of that retort.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:09 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I find the above version of the Nolan chart to be accessible and useful. My views tend to chart a bit below the letter "B" in "American Libertarianism."
quote:
I'm sure hank will claim he's a libertarian. The kind of libertarian that just got shoved out by the Mises caucus
Goddamn, I'm good.
These are the woke, pedophile accepting people that Dave Smith took pleasure in kicking out of power
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:13 am to Jjdoc
quote:JJDoc, I am trying really hard to be civil with you.
What you are defending is sickness and grooming at any level at ANY PLACE. That makes you SICK!
I do NOT accept the premise that reading to kids in outlandish costumes constitutes "grooming." I do not think that those performers are trying to diddle those kids, and I don't think that they are hoping they get to diddle those kids in a few years. I think they are just hoping that their volunteerism will lead to a generation of kids that do not see gays (most drag performers are gay) as being freaks.
I guess I am just slower than you to attribute ill-motives to everyone different from myself.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:13 am to AggieHank86
Sorry for forcing you into a thread I created. 
You are a cartoon character......only a very, very sad one.
You gonna continue to post well on into the night again?
You are a cartoon character......only a very, very sad one.
You gonna continue to post well on into the night again?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:14 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I guess I am just slower than you to attribute ill-motives to everyone different from myself.
#4
https://www.powerofpositivity.com/gaslighting-phrases-abusive-people-control/
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:15 am to AggieHank86
quote:You ask this like it's weird if someone has never attended a Drag Show.
Seriously, people, have you ever attended a Drag Show?
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:15 am to oogabooga68
quote:Did Shorty die? If so, I would hate to hear that. I liked him as a poster, even when we disagreed (about half the time).
Somewhere out there, Shorty Rob is smiling....
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:18 am to upgrayedd
quote:Or maybe you can read. I have described myself as libertarian (small-L) since I arrived here.
I'm sure hank will claim he's a libertarian. The kind of libertarian that just got shoved out by the Mises caucusquote:
My views tend to chart a bit below the letter "B" in "American Libertarianism."quote:
Goddamn, I'm good.
Remembering that does not make you a genius or a prognosticator. It makes you a marginally-functional adult.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:20 am to Flats
quote:I am obviously not asserting that any of you are alone in your views. Clearly, you outnumber me here, by far.
I guess I am just slower than you to attribute ill-motives to everyone different from myself.quote:
#4
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:22 am to G The Tiger Fan
quote:Yes.
Seriously, people, have you ever attended a Drag Show?quote:
You ask this like it's weird if someone has never attended a Drag Show.
And apparently I was wrong.
Drag shows are hilarious and good fun. It DOES surprise me that so-many purportedly-educated and -worldly people have never attended one.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:25 am to AggieHank86
quote:
JJDoc, I am trying really hard to be civil with you.
I don't give a damn what you are "trying" to do.
Defending what you ARE defending is a sickness.
quote:
I do NOT accept the premise that reading to kids in outlandish costumes constitutes "grooming."
I don't care what you "believe". Just because you demand it not be, doesn't make it truth.
Grooming: Any one of these is considered grooming
1- When a sexual or other kind of predator sets the stage for abusing another, such as a child or other person.
2- Trust: May give toys and/or other gifts and favors to the intended victim to gain trust.
3- Alienation: Settings the stage for the intended victim to become alienated from their primary caregivers/circles or family and community.
4- Fear/dependency: Sets up a power dynamic in which the victim feels too afraid to report the abuse, perhaps by involving the victim in activities their friends and family might judge the victim negatively for, such as drug use (or even the abuse itself).
5- Training: preparing or conditioning someone, usually over a longer period of time. A process of building trust with a child, wearing down the child's boundaries.
It's not what you believe.
quote:
I guess I am just slower than you to attribute ill-motives to everyone different from myself.
There are plenty of people that is different from myself. There are, however, boundaries that should never be crossed.
You can not hide behind "we should accept all things different" for the sake of.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:28 am to AggieHank86
It's a very good thing that we have Hank on this site willing (to a degree) admit what he believes.
Parents need to be on guard. It's a huge mistake to think your kids aren't in danger from people like Hank. We need to be very careful about who we allow our children to be around, whether they are school teachers, librarians, etc.
And, as unfortunate as the reality is, you need to be wary of family members as well. People like Hank are everywhere. Kids deserve grandparents. But, you can't leave your kid with a grandparent like Hank.
Parents need to be on guard. It's a huge mistake to think your kids aren't in danger from people like Hank. We need to be very careful about who we allow our children to be around, whether they are school teachers, librarians, etc.
And, as unfortunate as the reality is, you need to be wary of family members as well. People like Hank are everywhere. Kids deserve grandparents. But, you can't leave your kid with a grandparent like Hank.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:32 am to moneyg
quote:
It's a very good thing that we have Hank on this site willing (to a degree) admit what he believes.
Since returning from his ban (all the alters he used aside) Hank has revealed a WHOOOOOLE lot about who he really is.
I almost think it's a cry for help.
Maybe we should pity and ignore him.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:33 am to Jjdoc
Did you seriously just cite the Urban Dictionary as a source for defining "grooming?" That may be better than Gateway Pundit, though.
Posted on 6/16/22 at 11:34 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I am obviously not asserting that any of you are alone in your views.
No, you're just lying. You know it's not "everyone different" from us because it's been explained in no small detail; you just choose to lie.
ETA It's the "I see what that says" part that I was referring to, not the "you're the only one" aspect. It's such a staple of yours you probably don't even recognize that you do it.
This post was edited on 6/16/22 at 11:38 am
Page 19 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News