- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Drag Queens intentions are pure, why don't they simply wear their everyday clothes
Posted on 6/15/22 at 5:10 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 6/15/22 at 5:10 pm to AggieHank86
quote:"Never" is an interesting word. Especially from you, as meticulous with language as you attempt to be.
And this is why you and I will NEVER get along.
You are a bright guy. You're presumptuous, sometime foolish, but bright. I'd certainly NEVER say you and I would "never get along."
I do call a spade a spade though.
When your contrarian posts are demonstrably ridiculous, as is the case here, I'm going to call you on them.
Bank it!
If that is why you and I will "NEVER get along," I can live with it.
quote:Negative!
I showed you the correct use of the term
You showed a definition which you INCORRECTLY interpreted.
I showed you the interpretation of that same definition by a US Attorney ... who gained conviction based on the same.
Law is not even my field, which is why, when you claimed, "My reputation here for hard-headedness arises from opinions, not factual errors," I responded with surprise.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 5:29 pm to LSUconvert
What purpose are these freaks are doing this?
Give me all the purposes they are doing it?
Give me all the purposes they are doing it?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 5:34 pm to roadGator
quote:You won't get an answer.
Give me all the purposes they are doing it?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 5:35 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Pedophilia is not hebephilia, which is not ephebophilia. The kids at these story hours are all prepubescent, meaning that pedophilia is the only question at issue as related to the library events. The only time I recall emphasizing the distinction was regarding the high school teacher and his 16yo student. I explained the facts of that event simply to demonstrate that the ephebophilia present in that article was NOT (as implied by the poster) relevant to the alleged pedophilia he believed to be associated with the library events.
I asked if you thought the behavior in my very simple hypothetical was wrong, and your answer was specific to pre-pubescent children. You introduced that. So, I drew a conclusion about that statement and opened the door for you to clarify.
quote:
Enough of this shite. No, I am not. And I have finally had enough and RA'd you. Your accusations and implications are far, far over the line of good fun and minor insults
I haven't accused you of anything. I've asked you questions. And, I'm responding to your questions. I'm glad to hear that you are not attracted to minors. I wasn't sure of that based on your answers.
You've misread my intentions if you think my comments are in "good fun" and/or I'm trying to insult. No, I'm mortified by your opinions and think they are absolutely disgusting. I've interrogated you to try to understand what is driving your opinion.
If you don't want to answer the questions, fair enough. I can't make you. But, I think your opinions on the subject reflect the current danger the children face in this upside down world. People you defend are dangerous.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 5:37 pm to roadGator
quote:
Give me all the purposes they are doing it?
I'm not sure, but I think Ghislaine Maxwell was indicted for it and it rhymes with "rooming".
Posted on 6/15/22 at 5:46 pm to roadGator
quote:
Give me all the purposes they are doing it?
I don't think I could do that, I bet I can get at least one though. Good enough?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 6:12 pm to LSUconvert
quote:
I bet I can get at least one though.
Everyone who is honest can do one.
1) Turning the cultural norms of gender upside down.
That’s it. You don’t need to add anything else.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 6:17 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
Groomer
Posted on 6/15/22 at 6:37 pm to the808bass
Is it possible to turn gender norms upside down without a penis visible through pantyhose? And at childrens eye level?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 6:40 pm to THog
quote:that guy‘s stage name is Sasha Sota (sorry, I do not know his real name).
Is it possible to turn gender norms upside down without a penis visible through pantyhose? And at childrens eye level?
Have you seen absolutely anyone, anywhere, defending Sota? Because I have not seen it.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 6:46 pm to THog
quote:
Is it possible to turn gender norms upside down without a penis visible through pantyhose?
Not for fetishists.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 6:47 pm to AggieHank86
Not defending but the librarian did not stop the show. From article
librarian hosting the event reminded the adults that they are role models for the children and that “if anyone gets upset — even grownups — you can leave."
And later implemented dress code. Not possible they would carry on as is and ban pictures.
librarian hosting the event reminded the adults that they are role models for the children and that “if anyone gets upset — even grownups — you can leave."
And later implemented dress code. Not possible they would carry on as is and ban pictures.
This post was edited on 6/15/22 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 6/15/22 at 6:50 pm to THog
quote:So, Sota’s behavior was a problem, no question. Disgusting.
librarian hosting the event reminded the adults that they are role models for the children and that “if anyone gets upset — even grownups — you can leave."
Was the librarian complicit or just caught off-guard by Sota’s brazenness?
As an aside, this happened in Minnesota three years ago. Have there been other instances of egregious behavior at Story Time events?
This post was edited on 6/15/22 at 6:53 pm
Posted on 6/15/22 at 6:52 pm to AggieHank86
You are just as disgusting as pedos and groomers because you are an enabler of their actions towards children.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 6:57 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Penis was not visible thru pantyhose.
Have you seen absolutely anyone, anywhere, defending Sota?
Posted on 6/15/22 at 7:03 pm to THog
quote:I have. The second photo is unaltered. I went all the way back to the original FB posting. Meaning as gross as the pic appears, nothing but flesh colored knit was visible beneath the dress.
Go look again. 2nd photo.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 7:04 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Judge Brett Blomme, 38, was arrested and charged with seven counts of child pornography possession. According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, he is accused of uploading 27 videos and pictures of child sexual abuse to the messaging app Kik under the name "DomMasterBB."
Each count against Blomme carries with it a minimum sentence of three years with the potential for up to 15 years with a decade of supervised release. With seven counts charged against him, Blomme is looking at a minimum of 21 years in prison should he be convicted.
Blomme was also a former president for the Cream City Foundation — an LGBTQ advocacy group in Wisconsin that advertised DQSH events it sponsored — as well as a husband and adoptive father of two children. Blomme listed his presidency with the Cream City Foundation on his LinkedIn profile.
LINK
Carry on. Nothing to see.
Posted on 6/15/22 at 7:06 pm to NC_Tigah
Could say outline or print.
Went back and No. Is clearly visible. Sticking up and against left thigh. May need to enlarge photo.
Went back and No. Is clearly visible. Sticking up and against left thigh. May need to enlarge photo.
This post was edited on 6/15/22 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 6/15/22 at 7:08 pm to THog
quote:The photo is unaltered
Could say outline or print.
Popular
Back to top



0






