- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

If Dems “found” ballots in ‘20 in order to win then Biden would have outperformed polls
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:25 pm
Hypothesis: If Biden won swing states in 2020 due to the Democrats “finding the votes necessary” in the middle of election night to flip the outcome, then the actual election results would show Biden outperformed the polling leading up to the election.
Method: I determined the polling average going into the election by averaging the final polls that included all candidates that would be on the ballot. The poll results I used can be found on wikipedia and 270towin.com.
Conclusion: The data shows Biden did not outperform the polling in any of the swing states.
Georgia
Actual Result: Biden +0.2%
Poll Avg: Biden +0.6%
Pennsylvania
Actual Result: Biden +1.2%
Poll Avg: Biden +2.8%
Michigan
Actual Result: Biden +2.8%
Poll Avg: Biden +5.8%
North Carolina
Actual Result: Trump +1.3%
Poll Avg: Biden+1.0%
Wisconsin
Actual Result: Biden +0.7%
Poll Avg: Biden +9.0%
Average of the swing states results: Biden +0.7%
Average of the swing states polling: Biden +3.8%
Trump’s swing state average actual result was 3.1% better than the average swing state polling.
____________
Taking out Wisconsin, the state with the largest discrepancy between polling and the actual result:
Average of the swing states actual results (not including WI): Biden +0.7%
Average of the swing states polling (not including WI): Biden +2.6%
Trump’s swing state average actual result was 1.9% better than the average swing state poll (not including WI).
________________
Trump also outperformed polling in 2016. I completed the same exercise for 2016 swing states to compare how much better Trump did than the polling in the ‘16 and ‘20 elections, and the results are very similar.
2016:
Florida
Result: Trump +1.2%
Poll Avg: Trump +1.3%
Michigan
Result: Trump +0.2%
Poll Avg: Hillary +2.5%
Pennsylvania
Result: Trump +0.7%
Poll Avg: Hillary +2.2%
Wisconsin
Result: Trump +0.7%
Poll Avg: Hillary +5.5%
Average of the swing states results: Trump +0.7%
Average of the swing states polling: Hillary +2.2%
Trump’s swing state average result was 1.5% better than the average swing state poll (2.2% minus 0.7%).
_______________
Taking out Wisconsin, the state with the biggest discrepancy between polling and actual result:
Average of the swing states results: Trump +0.7%
Average of the swing states polling: Hillary +1.1%
Trump’s swing state average result was 1.8% better than the average swing state poll.
Method: I determined the polling average going into the election by averaging the final polls that included all candidates that would be on the ballot. The poll results I used can be found on wikipedia and 270towin.com.
Conclusion: The data shows Biden did not outperform the polling in any of the swing states.
Georgia
Actual Result: Biden +0.2%
Poll Avg: Biden +0.6%
Pennsylvania
Actual Result: Biden +1.2%
Poll Avg: Biden +2.8%
Michigan
Actual Result: Biden +2.8%
Poll Avg: Biden +5.8%
North Carolina
Actual Result: Trump +1.3%
Poll Avg: Biden+1.0%
Wisconsin
Actual Result: Biden +0.7%
Poll Avg: Biden +9.0%
Average of the swing states results: Biden +0.7%
Average of the swing states polling: Biden +3.8%
Trump’s swing state average actual result was 3.1% better than the average swing state polling.
____________
Taking out Wisconsin, the state with the largest discrepancy between polling and the actual result:
Average of the swing states actual results (not including WI): Biden +0.7%
Average of the swing states polling (not including WI): Biden +2.6%
Trump’s swing state average actual result was 1.9% better than the average swing state poll (not including WI).
________________
Trump also outperformed polling in 2016. I completed the same exercise for 2016 swing states to compare how much better Trump did than the polling in the ‘16 and ‘20 elections, and the results are very similar.
2016:
Florida
Result: Trump +1.2%
Poll Avg: Trump +1.3%
Michigan
Result: Trump +0.2%
Poll Avg: Hillary +2.5%
Pennsylvania
Result: Trump +0.7%
Poll Avg: Hillary +2.2%
Wisconsin
Result: Trump +0.7%
Poll Avg: Hillary +5.5%
Average of the swing states results: Trump +0.7%
Average of the swing states polling: Hillary +2.2%
Trump’s swing state average result was 1.5% better than the average swing state poll (2.2% minus 0.7%).
_______________
Taking out Wisconsin, the state with the biggest discrepancy between polling and actual result:
Average of the swing states results: Trump +0.7%
Average of the swing states polling: Hillary +1.1%
Trump’s swing state average result was 1.8% better than the average swing state poll.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:28 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
Hypothesis: If Biden won swing states in 2020 due to the Democrats “finding the votes necessary” in the middle of election night to flip the outcome, then the actual election results would show Biden outperformed the polling leading up to the election.
Hypothesis includes a logical fallacy.
Rest of post is trash.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:29 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Hypothesis includes a logical fallacy.
If Dems created votes that they didn’t actually earn, then the polls would obviously have not “captured” those fraudulent votes, and therefore Biden would be outperforming the polling.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:34 pm to Jon Ham
Another pro Biden poster heard from
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:37 pm to Jon Ham
So in other words, polls are wrong. I think we already knew that
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:37 pm to Jon Ham
Lotta work for a bunch of BS.
TLDR but know the inane arguments you are presenting.
Bellwether Counties
BS Plumbing leak in Atlanta
State AG's changing laws they had no authority to change
ALL swing states shutting down counting voting at the same time but not really shutting down counting votes
Democrat operatives kicking out and blocking access for Poll Watchers in Pennsylvania and others
Need I go on?
It was a rigged election and PDJT won Bigly for legal votes.
TLDR but know the inane arguments you are presenting.
Bellwether Counties
BS Plumbing leak in Atlanta
State AG's changing laws they had no authority to change
ALL swing states shutting down counting voting at the same time but not really shutting down counting votes
Democrat operatives kicking out and blocking access for Poll Watchers in Pennsylvania and others
Need I go on?
It was a rigged election and PDJT won Bigly for legal votes.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:40 pm to Brosef Stalin
quote:
So in other words, polls are wrong. I think we already knew that
He's trying to lamely equivocate PDJT's current polls to the 2020 election.
Who knows? Polls are easily manipulated and I have not paid attention to much of the recent polling showing PDJT up Bigly.
We will see next year, eh? It'll play out.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:40 pm to Jon Ham
You are trusting that the polls are correct and truthful when time and time again they are proven biased and inaccurate.
Thus your hypothesis is on false footing.
Another hypothesis- The poll results are created to protect the shenanigans with the vote numbers.
Thus your hypothesis is on false footing.
Another hypothesis- The poll results are created to protect the shenanigans with the vote numbers.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:43 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
You are trusting that the polls are correct and truthful when time and time again they are proven biased and inaccurate.
If you look at the RCP aggregate it's actually a pretty damn close.
quote:
nother hypothesis- The poll results are created to protect the shenanigans with the vote numbers
Sounds like a hypothesis that a pedo conspiracy theorist would come up unfortunately
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:43 pm to Jon Ham
My oh my how far you Ronbots have fallen. Embarrassing
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:43 pm to deathvalleytiger10
As OP shows, Trump outperformed the polling in 2020 at very close to the same level as he outperformed the polling in 2016.
If Dems created a bunch of fraudulent ballots in 2020, then Trump would have not outperformed the polling at the same level as he did in 2016.
If Dems created a bunch of fraudulent ballots in 2020, then Trump would have not outperformed the polling at the same level as he did in 2016.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:47 pm to Jon Ham
That’s some Pokémon level foolishness Mr. Ham.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:48 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
By the way, have we citizens arrested Ted Cruz yet for his election fraud in Iowa?
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:54 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:
oh my how far you Ronbots have fallen. Embarrassing
His hypothesis has facts to back it up. You have childish emotions to support your opinion.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:54 pm to Jon Ham
Do Hillary’s polls and acctuals from 2016 and weigh Joe’s polls with that information…
And watch your “scientific theory” crumble…
And watch your “scientific theory” crumble…
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:56 pm to MisslePig
quote:
Do Hillary’s polls and acctuals from 2016 and weigh Joe’s polls with that information…
And watch your “scientific theory” crumble…
He did and it didn't crumble. Trump slightly out performed the polls both times.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:57 pm to MisslePig
quote:
Do Hillary’s polls and acctuals from 2016 and weigh Joe’s polls with that information…
Step ahead of you. You didn’t read down far enough in OP.
As OP shows, Trump outperformed the polling almost exactly the same in 2020 as he did in 2016. If Dems had created a bunch of fraudulent votes in 2020 to swing the election, then Trump would not have outperformed polling at the same level as 2016.
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:57 pm to Jon Ham
Hypothesis: many states cannot verify the accuracy or completeness of elections
Method: identification and signature verification
Result: racist
Method: identification and signature verification
Result: racist
Posted on 6/28/23 at 10:59 pm to Jon Ham
Only-Trumpers entire case: The polling and election results are all rigged, unless they’re good for Trump.
Popular
Back to top

29







