- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I think I’ve finally found the 2020 Election Fraud
Posted on 10/3/24 at 12:21 pm to boosiebadazz
Posted on 10/3/24 at 12:21 pm to boosiebadazz
That’s what I thought. Does your Firm donate to Republicans?
0
Posted on 10/3/24 at 12:23 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
McCain, Romney, Charles Boustany, John Schroeder.
Only one I was happy to actually pull the lever for out of that lineup.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 1:30 pm to boosiebadazz
Plenty of it was found years ago and still being found in Georgia and Arizona. Nice try tho, fig.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 1:43 pm to LegalEazyE
Election interference has been deboonked!
LINK
quote:
Former President Donald Trump and his campaign have accused special counsel Jack Smith of violating long-standing Justice Department norms by including new revelations about the former president's efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss in a filing released Wednesday.
In reality, a federal judge, not Smith, made the decision to release that filing to the public.
Trump on Thursday called it a "weaponization of government" to release the filing just a month before Election Day, alleging that Smith and federal law enforcement officials were improperly influencing a presidential election.
It's true that the Justice Department typically abides by an informal 60-day “quiet period” before an election — meaning they avoid taking discretionary action that could be seen as influencing voters. The new disclosures from the special counsel's office, however, were made in an ongoing criminal case at the order of a federal judge, Tanya Chutkan, who ultimately made the decision to release the redacted filing Wednesday.
Smith was not aware that Chutkan was going to make the decision to release the document, nor the timing of that release, two sources familiar with the matter who were not authorized to speak publicly told NBC News.
LINK
Posted on 10/3/24 at 11:15 pm to the808bass
quote:
But it did take five or six explanatory posts from me for you to even understand what the chart was about.
You're a lying POS.
It took 5 or 6 posts of me trying to get you to give me non-horseshite links for where you got your bogus numbers from.
If they have 100,000 registered voters in a precinct and there are 110,000 (or 110% as you figure it) who do they attribute the extra 10,000 votes to have been submitted by?
Posted on 10/3/24 at 11:17 pm to NIH
quote:
What policies motivated you to vote for those Republicans?
apparently he is attracted to weakness.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 11:18 pm to texridder
quote:
It took 5 or 6 posts of me trying to get you to give me non-horseshite links for where you got your bogus numbers from.
I gave you the links. You didn’t like that I had actually done the homework. You also struggle with very basic concepts that are new to you. I assume that’s because you’re a woman. You could print out my posts and read them to whatever unfortunate soul was tricked into cohabitating with you. They might help you.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 11:25 pm to the808bass
quote:Why don't you answer my question about who they attribute the excess votes to when they run out of registered voters.
gave you the links. You didn’t like that I had given you..
Posted on 10/3/24 at 11:26 pm to texridder
quote:
who they attribute the excess votes to when they run out of registered voters.
After having pored over my posts in that thread countless times, and then having had my posts explained to you many more times, with each phrase I use being explicitly defined using easy-to-discern English words that are common to everyone’s lexicon, you still can’t fricking understand it you absolutely dumb bitch.
This post was edited on 10/3/24 at 11:27 pm
Posted on 10/3/24 at 11:31 pm to the808bass
quote:My question was in English your problem is that you don't won't to answer it because it would expose you as the imbecile you are.
English words that are common to everyone’s lexicon,
Who would they attribute the extra 10,000 votes to?
Posted on 10/3/24 at 11:42 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
Michigan on there twice, Arizona was the other one.
Between the hours of 2 and 4 AM on November 5th.
Nobody has published the proof. I want to. I just need to know where to get all the data. Both from NYT/Politico/anyone tracking, and from the MSM/Fox Broadcasts. I’ve never heard good information as to why the shift happened.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 11:53 pm to texridder
You’ll need to work on comprehending the difference between eligible voter and registered voter.
I’ve explained it too many times to you. It appears that you might not be able to comprehend it.
I’ve explained it too many times to you. It appears that you might not be able to comprehend it.
Posted on 10/4/24 at 12:04 am to the808bass
You're arguing with arguably the biggest dumbass on this board but it's a close race.
Posted on 10/4/24 at 12:48 am to the808bass
quote:
You’ll need to work on comprehending the difference between eligible voter and registered voter.
Who would they attribute the 10,000 votes in excess of the number of registered voters to?
Posted on 10/4/24 at 4:05 am to boosiebadazz
Couldn’t sleep so figured I’d get after it early this morning. Just pushed 2 plates 5 times. Could do 1 earlier this year and wouldn’t dream of even trying without spot. Never too late to start training.
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News