- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I think I’ve finally found the 2020 Election Fraud
Posted on 10/3/24 at 5:36 am to boosiebadazz
Posted on 10/3/24 at 5:36 am to boosiebadazz
If any of that was true, big if, show me the part that was illegal? Having a conversation ( another laugh ) and a pretext of a plan to stop what is considerably false election that has mountains of evidence that courts say have no standing is not a crime any more than democrats saying now they won’t seat Trump or the ones in the past that took Trump & Bush elections to court. At least have a set of balls to acknowledge the continued failures of Jack Schitt sorry Smith
1
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:12 am to Nosevens
Be ready for this hoax.
This is the headline Jack Smith wanted out now.
This is the headline Jack Smith wanted out now.
This post was edited on 10/3/24 at 7:46 am
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:16 am to BuzzSaw 12
quote:
DOMINION EMAILS CONFIRM
Remember too that there was more to this election theft than the unproven claims of electronic vote manipulation. Indeed, lost in the news of the Capitol melee was the last minute petition by legislative leaders of the majority parties in Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Arizona for Pence and Congress to delay certification:
More than 100 state legislators ask Pence to delay certification of electoral votes by 10 days: Lawmakers say they want more time to investigate the irregularities that occurred in their respective states.
quote:
"The U.S. Constitution gives us authority to determine how elections are run," he added. "All of that assumes the law is going to be followed by those who implement it. And now that we know the law wasn't followed in this election, so as state legislators is it up to us to determine did that have any effect on the outcome, to hold those people who didn't follow the law accountable and to make sure in the future those laws are followed."
Couple this with the fact that the executive branch in many of these swing states repeatedly ignored court orders, sandbagged legislative subpoenas, destroyed evidence and otherwise blatantly ignored election laws and the claims of an illegitimate election has not only NOT been disproven, it has scarcely been adjudicated.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:16 am to AZHorn
quote:
Since when is it against the law and treason to question the results of an election?
Al Gore agrees with this post…
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:26 am to boosiebadazz
There are no such thing as fake electors
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:44 am to boosiebadazz
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:47 am to boosiebadazz
Jack Smith is scum like the OP and should be locked up for election interference.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:49 am to boosiebadazz
This melt will get 15 pages, minimum.
But hey, at least girls that your migrants are raping can get abortions, ammiright?
But hey, at least girls that your migrants are raping can get abortions, ammiright?
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:56 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
We’ve known that you and SFP and a select few others have been cheering on this lawfare against Trump for quite some time, but thank you once again for proving to everyone that y’all are just a bunch of pathetic hacks.
This is about as weak of a post as I’ve seen, even for you.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:57 am to boosiebadazz
Source is an un named employee. So basically, a Schiff whistle blower that will never come forward to testify because they don't exist and it was all made up.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:58 am to EZE Tiger Fan
This is how you know Vance wiped the floor with Walz on Tuesday night. Like programmed robots, they're on to the next thing.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:20 am to boosiebadazz
Is this you trusting everything in a prosecutor’s briefing?
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:22 am to ell_13
quote:
Is this you trusting everything in a prosecutor’s briefing?
He wants to believe.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:27 am to ell_13
Certainly Trump will have an opportunity to respond. As he should.
A jury should then weigh the evidence and credibility of the witnesses and render a verdict on whether he broke the law or not.
A jury should then weigh the evidence and credibility of the witnesses and render a verdict on whether he broke the law or not.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:32 am to SCLibertarian
quote:
Like programmed robots, they're on to the next thing.
The "thing" has been, and always will be, coming up with ways for them to jail their political opponents. Period.
If they can't kill him, this is the next best thing. Sham charges and sham trials with crooked judges and paid off juries with TDS.
These people are all sick. I am so glad I no longer vote next to these people. As much as people like the OP sicken me, I could never imagine a day where I would openly advocate for them to be silenced, jailed, or even killed.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:33 am to boosiebadazz
So there are obviously two things leftists absolutely don't want to talk about today:
- Walz getting annihilated by Vance
- The Harris administrations dismal response to the trapped people in western NC, east TN, etc.
This is when you get these bullshite news dumps that fall apart in about a day.
- Walz getting annihilated by Vance
- The Harris administrations dismal response to the trapped people in western NC, east TN, etc.
This is when you get these bullshite news dumps that fall apart in about a day.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:35 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Certainly Trump will have an opportunity to respond. As he should. A jury should then weigh the evidence and credibility of the witnesses and render a verdict on whether he broke the law or not.
Based on your shitty thread, I'm assuming you believe they got him this time, right? I mean this case is signed, sealed, and delivered based on your information, right? No chance slippery Trump escapes the jaws of injustice again, surely?
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:39 am to Paddyshack
quote:
Based on your shitty thread, I'm assuming you believe they got him this time, right? I mean this case is signed, sealed, and delivered based on your information, right? No chance slippery Trump escapes the jaws of injustice again, surely?
Absolutely not. It’s actually my personal opinion Trump is going to win the election and the whole thing will get dropped/dismissed.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:41 am to boosiebadazz
quote:Good for you!
I think I’ve finally found the 2020 Election Fraud
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:44 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Certainly Trump will have an opportunity to respond. As he should. A jury should then weigh the evidence and credibility of the witnesses and render a verdict on whether he broke the law or not.
And that’s what your saying Jack Smith did here releasing all this to the public and out in the media 30 days before the election?
You sure you understand the difference between court system and court of public opinion?
Now your going to try to say with a straight face Trumps legal team has a proper way to respond to this in the media somehow?
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News