Started By
Message

re: I think it's time for America to cut social security altogether (serious)

Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:26 am to
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2956 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:26 am to
quote:

The program was and is designed as an annuity


So people who pay in the minimum credits get little to nothing and people who pay in a lot of credits get a lot, right?
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
31395 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Boomers are largely targeted because they're receiving the benefits and will reject even the slightest, most logical reforms (like a slight increase in age for eligibility).


The tail end of Boomers have already experienced the "slight increase".

SFP, I see you have actually have put time in to learning about SS unlike a lot of the other posters.
Posted by Longdriver98
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Nov 2005
3584 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:39 am to
I'm sure others have said this, but I am fine with ending Social Security as long as they give me ALL of the money that I have paid into it and without taxes being withheld.

It is a MANDATORY tax that is withheld from your paycheck and you cannot opt out of it period. Secondly they have raised the wage threshold limit for the tax to a point that it now never ends. They move the goal posts for full benefit retirement, and complain that is is soon to be insolvent. But they have no problem sending BILLIONS to foreign wars without any input from the taxpayers.
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
17545 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:41 am to
Fine by me but it won't happen
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2956 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:47 am to
quote:

It is a MANDATORY tax that is withheld from your paycheck and you cannot opt out of it period. Secondly they have raised the wage threshold limit for the tax to a point that it now never ends. They move the goal posts for full benefit retirement, and complain that is is soon to be insolvent. But they have no problem sending BILLIONS to foreign wars without any input from the taxpayers.


Getting your investment back is never going to happen. They would have to print so much money that the dollar would be burned for heat or used as toilet paper.

Second, the BILLIONS to foreign wars wouldn't touch what the US owes for entitlement spending.

I'm going to link the figures again, but hopefully it will show you that worry about military spending while ignoring entitlement spending is like going to an emergency room with a heart attack and the doctors focusing on an ingrown toenail.

Social security is a scam. They take your money, give it to current entitlement recipients, and plan on your kids to pay their taxes so they can give their money to you. Problem is, there won't be enough kids in the world to pay what the government will owe your generation.

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”
- Margaret Thatcher

Entitlements will kill the USA
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:00 am to
quote:

COLA exists within the SS scheme
COLA would be the first thing I'd cut.
In fact, no COLA .... anywhere in government spending until the budgetary deficit disappears.

Second, march up the retirement age.

Third, eliminate obligatory age of benefit withdrawal. If someone wants to wait until they're 80 to begin benefits, a-okay.

But those are not likely solutions because they shrink the program. The most likely solution is to grow, rather than shrink SS.

Why?
Because Social Security is nothing but a goddamned government borrowing vehicle foisted under shitty terms on the general public (the obligatory lenders), then mislabeled as a benefit to its public lenders. Shrinking it runs 180° counter the government's interests.
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 9:01 am
Posted by wallowinit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2006
17705 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:02 am to
It can be done only if you discontinue deducting for SS from people currently entering the job market who haven't yet had their money confiscated from their paycheck.

To just stop it at some arbitrary point so that the people who've paid in for years and years would have their money confiscated in the end would be wholly disastrous.

You people who talk about just putting a halt to social security are some real goofballs.
Posted by ArcticTiger
North Pole
Member since Nov 2018
2846 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:06 am to
Give me back every penny that I put into it and I am good with that?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:08 am to
quote:

I understand that it's a Ponzi Scheme and that it would cost us through the nose to shut it down
It is neither a Ponzi, nor would it cost "us" to shut it down. The government won't shut SS down ... ever .... as long as government retains need for a reliable, cheap debt vehicle. The Feds will term their refusal a "preservation of benefits," and a "favor" to the population. Sadly, a majority of folks will believe that crap.
Posted by Ebridg3
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Sep 2016
3141 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:15 am to
This is mostly a young person take. No matter how financially sound you are, things can happen unexpectedly in life and eventually you're too old to work. Unfortunately, it's a pay it forward type of program, so cutting it off just screws the next generation to use it. I'd rather find ways to lower tax burden and keep SS. I mean, we piss away trillions on BS that should go before SS.
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2956 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:23 am to
quote:

I mean, we piss away trillions on BS that should go before SS.


Healthcare. Medicare and Medicaid. Everything else is drops in the bucket.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:30 am to
quote:

This is mostly a young person take. No matter how financially sound you are, things can happen unexpectedly in life
Then the solution would be to create an actual retirement program, or even a privately operated annuity. SS is neither.

SS is essentially a balloon note you are providing to the government. But on the government's terms, not yours. In the vast majority of circumstances, our Federal Government is Social Security's beneficiary, not the person receiving a monthly SS check.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
31395 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:31 am to
quote:

So people who pay in the minimum credits get little to nothing and people who pay in a lot of credits get a lot, right?


Wrong. It's the other way around, but that still doesn't negate the fact that it's an annuity.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55732 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Getting your investment back is never going to happen. They would have to print so much money that the dollar would be burned for heat or used as toilet paper.

Second, the BILLIONS to foreign wars wouldn't touch what the US owes for entitlement spending. I'm going to link the figures again, but hopefully it will show you that worry about military spending while ignoring entitlement spending is like going to an emergency room with a heart attack and the doctors focusing on an ingrown toenail.

Social security is a scam. They take your money, give it to current entitlement recipients, and plan on your kids to pay their taxes so they can give their money to you. Problem is, there won't be enough kids in the world to pay what the government will owe your generation.

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” - Margaret Thatcher Entitlements will kill the USA


Of the Top Ten nations in military spending the US is #1 and spends nearly $1 trillion annually on national defense, more than the next 9 nations below the US combined, this has been going on for decades.

The US is carrying nearly $1 trillion in interest payments annually on $35 trillion of US debt with tax revenues of approximately $4-5 trillion while spending nearly $7 trillion annually with $1.5-2 trillion of that $7 trillion being deficit spending.

The problem isn't tax revenues it's corrupt and irresponsible politicians robbing the US taxpayer of the fruits of their labor. The waste, fraud and inefficiencies of a bloated federal government is destroying the constitutional republic, the US debt spiral is equally as dangerous to the constitutional republic as the Cultural Marxist movement is, they go together hand in glove. I also believe an increasing number of Americans are beginning to understand the situation with the federal government's corruption and irresponsible behavior and they're sick of it all.

All of this ^^^ was typed to illustrate there wouldn't be an issue with the solvency of Social Security if our federal government wasn't so fricked up.
Posted by ItNeverRains
Offugeaux
Member since Oct 2007
28166 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:41 am to
quote:

If you won't entertain a logical shifting of age eligibility, you're not really open to discussing much regarding the program. Logically, at least. The program was not designed to provide for seniors for 20+ years


I’m open to that option after EVERYONE who is abusing the system gets punched in the mouth first. The notion that those who funded this scam in the first place take the biggest hit out the gate is an ideology I will never subscribe to.
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 9:48 am
Posted by UFMatt
Proud again to be an American
Member since Oct 2010
13047 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:41 am to
The US citizens that have paid into the system for their whole lives deserve it. Non-citizens, people that haven't paid into the system don't. Going forward you should be able to opt out of the system and the government needs to stop stealing money from social security, which is the reason why it is running out of money.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:42 am to
quote:

The tail end of Boomers have already experienced the "slight increase".

It clearly needs to be more. The math doesn't work.
Posted by ItNeverRains
Offugeaux
Member since Oct 2007
28166 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:53 am to
quote:

The US citizens that have paid into the system for their whole lives deserve it. Non-citizens, people that haven't paid into the system don't. Going forward you should be able to opt out of the system and the government needs to stop stealing money from social security, which is the reason why it is running out of money.


This is a reasonable logical position that can never be implemented if a Democrat or Republican politician wants to ever win another election at the federal level.

Because it’s a political stalemate, only option is for everyone to suffer.
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 9:55 am
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
17134 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 9:55 am to
Why? At least some of SS was paid into.

I would rather get rid of all welfare. Housing, ebt, snap, crazy checks. We can deport all the illegals then the former welfare queens and kings can do the jobs that illegals had been doing.

Or they can starve.
Posted by BigDrip0341
N LA
Member since Aug 2023
132 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 10:05 am to
quote:

if a Democrat or Republican politician wants to ever win another election at the federal level


this ~ it’s political suicide

“More is lost by indecision than wrong decision. Indecision is the thief of opportunity. It will steal you blind.”

Marcus Tullius Cicero

Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram