Started By
Message

re: I think it's time for America to cut social security altogether (serious)

Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:39 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:39 am to
quote:

People misunderstand and think their money would be there if then government hadn’t taken it, but that’s simply untrue. It’s not like we’re running out of money because of the IOUs, we’re running out because of the math.

It's just one of those SS memes, like "Get rid of it once you pay me back everything I've paid in".
Posted by texas tortilla
houston
Member since Dec 2015
4580 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:41 am to
they have already spent all the money you paid in. my ss check comes from the general fund. there was no locked box.
Posted by icheerforgeorgia
Member since Nov 2011
2010 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:42 am to
As long as they pay me out for all the social security tax I've paid for
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:44 am to
quote:

It’s a big circle jerk.


Sure but it’s not being raided for pet projects like people say. That’s my point.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:45 am to
quote:

They've been the generation in power supporting the stuff you're posting about (assuming it's true) for decades now.
For Decades now? Perhaps Centuries even?

Assuming "boomers" span from late-1946 to 1964, we've had exactly one "boomer" POTUS in all those decades boomers were "in power." If one includes all of 1946 (baby boom was not evident until late-1946), 4 POTUS's fall into that category, 3 being born in the summer of 1946. Of the recent Senate/House leaders, just one (1), Chuck Schumer, is a "boomer."

Notwithstanding, the "boomer thing" is playing convenient idiot to the government now in place.
The government now in place is not the boomers' government.
It's not the silents' government.
It's not Gen-X's government.

The government wanting you to blame others while it continues to screw you is collectively ours. You sound like you are its patsy.
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2956 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:45 am to
George W. Bush was the first politician with the balls to take on the problem of entitlements. His plan to privatize social security was the best idea put forward to keep America solvent in the face of huge unfunded liabilities.

Democrats skewered him over it and convinced the American public that he was going to throw granny in the street and the American public was too stupid to ask the right questions.

We'll never see another politician with the guts to try and solve our real problems.
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 7:48 am
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
32244 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:47 am to
You can frick right off leech

Oh, and get a job
This post was edited on 8/13/24 at 7:48 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138873 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:47 am to
quote:

As opposed to paying in for 40 years and getting less than you're likely to receive?
You want more?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:48 am to
quote:

We'll never see another politician with the guts to try and solve our real problems.


We’re on the hook for massive cuts in the next 8 years - we won’t have a choice.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:50 am to
quote:

For Decades now? Perhaps Centuries even?

No. Decades.

Their time is ending and older Gen X is moving more into roles of authority to replace them.

In 15-20 years, older Millennials like myself will be moving into those roles

quote:

The government wanting you to blame others while it continues to screw you is collectively ours. You sound like you are its patsy.

I'm proposing solutions.

Those solutions are just not palatable to people who are blaming others, as you put it.

Boomers are largely targeted because they're receiving the benefits and will reject even the slightest, most logical reforms (like a slight increase in age for eligibility). They're proposing a "frick you, I am getting mine" mentality and then blame shifting to everyone else for not solving the problem they could have solved over the past 20 years.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:51 am to
quote:

You want more?


COLA exists within the SS scheme, so if he's older than me, I would get more, by default.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23781 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 7:55 am to
Hmmmmm. If I understand you correctly, you are asking me to forfeit the money I've been contributing for the last 40ish years????

How about you go frick yourself and your stupid ideas. Try harder before you post such a short sighted solution to Americas problems.
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
19821 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:02 am to
quote:

That’s not how the Ponzi scheme works.

I understand that it's a Ponzi Scheme and that it would cost us through the nose to shut it down, but the alternative is to let it crash completely, which voters will never allow.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
23781 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:02 am to
quote:

George W. Bush was the first politician with the balls to take on the problem of entitlements


I see that word used describing SS. It's misleading. To begin with, if a person has contributed to the fund.... Your damn right they are entitled to the benefits.
Anyone not having contributed should not be part of that conversation, such as welfare.
The issue isn't the programs, it's how they are mishandled by the corrupt, inept, dysfunctional federal government. Eliminating SS and robbing folks of their contributed money isn't going to solve anything. The same system that fricked SS will still be functioning.

quote:

Entitlement Programs of the federal government include Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, Unemployment Insurance, and welfare programs. Entitlement programs are rights granted to citizens and certain non-citizens by federal law. The programs are either contributory or non-contributory
Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2956 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:08 am to
quote:

The issue isn't the programs, it's how they are mishandled by the corrupt, inept, dysfunctional federal government.


The program was designed as a ponzi scheme that assumed nothing was going to change...ever. It was a socialist program that led people to think they weren't responsible for saving for their own retirement. It is a classic example of a government buying people's votes with deception and with other people's money.

The issue is the programs. We dipped our toe in the socialist pool and now we're going to drown.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Hmmmmm. If I understand you correctly, you are asking me to forfeit the money I've been contributing for the last 40ish years????

How about you go frick yourself and your stupid ideas. Try harder before you post such a short sighted solution to Americas problems.


And this is why nothing will get done and the SS system will collapse
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Entitlement Programs of the federal government include Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, Unemployment Insurance, and welfare programs. Entitlement programs are rights granted to citizens and certain non-citizens by federal law. The programs are either contributory or non-contributory


You just quoted from a site with this tagline:

quote:

Make poverty and welfare understandable


AKA, leftist bullshite

That's why the defined SS the same as any other welfare program
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
31395 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:18 am to
quote:

You do know there is full retirement age and 62 right?


Wrong. FRA is 67. You can start taking SS at 62.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68810 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:21 am to
The public is in favor of Social Security. At most, you may see some modest reform, such as indexing payments. Even that would face resistance.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
31395 posts
Posted on 8/13/24 at 8:22 am to
quote:

The program was designed as a ponzi scheme


The program was and is designed as an annuity , but if calling it a Ponzi scheme makes you feel smarter than more power to you.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram