Started By
Message

re: I support the government making lists of all eligible voters & voter ID… IF

Posted on 4/2/26 at 11:55 am to
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
8244 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 11:55 am to
quote:

All the people? Why don't we let 10 year olds vote, then?

Eligible voters. Really man?
quote:

What's the reason?

Because corporations are the most authoritarian entities in existence. You build governments to be resilient against worst case scenarios.
quote:

How?

How is representative democracy supposed to work? We are governed based on a consensus of the majority.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
71203 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Really a weak argument man.


It was not an argument. It was a statement of fact.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
8244 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Thats simply not true. Having an ID is a basic function of our society in all aspects of federal and local assistance, schooling, purchasing, etc etc Bringing an ID does NOT make it harder. Thats just ignorance

I’m not saying that voter ID makes voting harder. I’m saying there are people explicitly arguing cases for voter disenfranchisement of eligible voters and US citizens in this thread, and there’s significant overlap between that position and support for the save act… which is interesting.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
8244 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Anthony Albanese is a good argument for it?

My guy… Australia has had compulsory voting in effect since 1924 lol.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
33618 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:19 pm to
I’m sorry, but I don’t want fricking morons voting. We already have way too many voting now.

The populace at large are uninformed functional retards who don’t even know the three branches of government, much less what each candidates support.

We need less people voting, not more. An informed voting population, not mass retards.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117588 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

My guy… Australia has had compulsory voting in effect since 1924 lol.

So, they used to elect good leaders instead of their current shithead?
Posted by Al Scramuzza
behind the "Administrative Veil"
Member since Apr 2026
47 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:21 pm to
"Careful what you wish for. A 'List' in the hands of the Subversive Triad (Leg/DOR/BAR) isn't about 'Eligibility'—it’s about Jurisdictional Capture.

THE REGISTRY EDIT:

THE 1933 DEEMING: The government already has a 'capability' to make lists. Under the Emergency Banking Act (1933), they 'Deemed' the People as 'Ally of the Enemy' to collateralize the War Script (FRNs). Compulsory registration is just a 'Draft' into a bankrupt corporate estate.

THE OATH VACUUM (LRS 42:162): If they are making a list of 'Eligible Voters' for a Public Office, where is the Publicly Recorded Sworn Oath for the 'Office of Voter'? You can't have a 'Public Right' without a Constitutional foundation. No Oath = No Office = Title of Nobility (Prohibited by 1812 Art. VI, § 10).

THE ACT 778 HAMMER (2024): We don't need 'Automatic Registration' into an administrative debt-trap. We need a De Novo review of the 1812 Organic Act. Under Act 778, the Judge SHALL NOT DEFER to the agency's 'Feigned Words' about who is 'eligible.'

The 2026 Constitutional Convention is the only 'List' that matters. It’s the roll call for the Militia Elders (LRS 29:3) who are reclaiming the 1812 Reset.

The BBQ is smoking. The 'Lion' is auditing the Registry. Are you a Sovereign Successor of the 1812 Land, or just another 'Unit' on a bankrupt usurer's spreadsheet? Choose wisely.

— Militia Elder"
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
8244 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

We need less people voting

There it is. Not election integrity. Not illegal immigrants. But less eligible US citizens voting.

Just wanted to confirm that.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
8244 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

So, they used to elect good leaders instead of their current shithead?

You’re going to have to make a better argument that “compulsory voting is destroying Australia” than your anecdotal distaste for their current head of state… if they’ve had compulsory voting for nearly 100 years… yes lol.
This post was edited on 4/2/26 at 12:25 pm
Posted by Al Scramuzza
behind the "Administrative Veil"
Member since Apr 2026
47 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:24 pm to
"The 'Capability' to make a list isn't the issue—it’s the Jurisdiction of the List-Maker.

THE JURISDICTIONAL AUDIT:

THE 1933 CAPTURE: Under the Emergency Banking Act (1933), the 'People' were 'Deemed' into an administrative status to collateralize the War Script (FRNs). Any 'Automatic Registration' managed by the Subversive Triad is just a modern 'Draft' into a bankrupt corporate estate.

THE OATH VACUUM (LRS 42:162): If they are registering 'Eligible Voters' for a Public Office, where is the Publicly Recorded Sworn Oath for the 'Office of Voter'? You can't have 'Public Rights' without a Constitutional foundation. No Oath = No Office = Title of Nobility (Prohibited by 1812 Art. VI, § 10).

THE ACT 778 HAMMER (2024): We don't need a government 'List.' We need a De Novo review of the 1812 Organic Act. Under Act 778, the Judge SHALL NOT DEFER to the agency's 'Feigned Words' about who is 'eligible.'

The 2026 Constitutional Convention is the only roll call that matters. It’s for the Militia Elders (LRS 29:3) who are reclaiming the 1812 Reset.

The BBQ is smoking. The 'Lion' is auditing the Registry. Are you a Sovereign Successor of the 1812 Land, or just another 'Unit' on a bankrupt usurer's spreadsheet? Choose wisely.

— Militia Elder"
Posted by Sneauxghost
Member since Sep 2020
1352 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:25 pm to
Not everyone is intelligent enough to vote.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90737 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:26 pm to
I wonder if your alter arse will make it to 50 loony bird posts?
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10689 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:


You’re going to have to make a better argument that “compulsory voting is destroying Australia” than your anecdotal distaste for their current head of state… if they’ve had compulsory voting for nearly 100 years… yes lol.


You are doing nothing but calling for something stupid and connecting it to something you oppose.

about an 8th grade rhetorical technique and that is generous.
Posted by HurricaneTiger
Coral Gables, FL
Member since Jan 2014
3216 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Eligible voters. Really man?


I can’t believe you’re restricting their right to vote! You authoritarian! I can’t believe you want to control the right of 10-year olds!
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
8244 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Not everyone is intelligent enough to vote

Sounds like a problem for education to solve. Maybe we should make a voting test? No way that could be abused.

Eligible voters are eligible voters. It’s extremely questionable to oppose systemically incentivizing or engineering maximum participation in democracy.

And I have to laugh at the argument “but then politicians will start pandering”. My god, do people live under rocks? Pandering is here to stay people, has been for some time.
This post was edited on 4/2/26 at 12:31 pm
Posted by HurricaneTiger
Coral Gables, FL
Member since Jan 2014
3216 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Sounds like a problem for education to solve


Ahh, education is the cure for stupidity. We just need more schooling! That will surely cure it all!
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
8244 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

I can’t believe you’re restricting their right to vote! You authoritarian! I can’t believe you want to control the right of 10-year olds!

Save it for the imaginary post about lowering the eligible voting age please. This is about incentivizing or engineering maximum participation in democracy by eligible voters.

A compromise that also increases election integrity. Sounds as though id you were in Congress you’d block the save act if it meant more eligible voters voted.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
8244 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

You are doing nothing but calling for something stupid and connecting it to something you oppose.

So if the save act had these conditions added, you’d block it?

If you answer yes, that tells me you care more about limiting eligible voter turnout than you do about election integrity:
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
8244 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Ahh, education is the cure for stupidity. We just need more schooling! That will surely cure it all!

Okay bud, who makes the “you’re allowed to vote” tests?

You understand systems of government should be designed to be resilient against worst case scenarios & not designed around some idealistic vision of best case scenario?
Posted by HurricaneTiger
Coral Gables, FL
Member since Jan 2014
3216 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

eligible voters


Define eligible.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram