21
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I said on here a year ago this was going to happen
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:17 pm
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:17 pm
And was called names for doing so. Well, here we are - Final piece to the Grand Conspiracy puzzle
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:20 pm to FLTech
I remember. I am rooting for you to be 100% right about everything
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:23 pm to FLTech
quote:I've called you a lot of names
I said on here a year ago this was going to happen
And was called names for doing so
Didn't have anything to do with politics though
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:29 pm to FLTech
No no no!
Power Mullah said that Obama stimmies made the Ayatollah abandon his nuclear ambitions altogether!
Power Mullah said that Obama stimmies made the Ayatollah abandon his nuclear ambitions altogether!
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:42 pm to Kafka
You're so tough and so courageous
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:46 pm to SDVTiger
Thanks! I'm not claiming to be smart about any of this shite.. I just listen to very reliable and very trustworthy podcasters (who have been 100% spot on correct about everything for the last few years) - I really wish some people on here would do the same.
This post was edited on 10/25/26 at 12:03 am
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:48 pm to FLTech
quote:
I said on here a year ago this was going to happen
SFP will deny you did. He will say he dug through 12 months of your posts just to troll that it wasn't exactly a year ago.
This post was edited on 10/24/26 at 11:50 pm
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:50 pm to Wolfwireless
It was actually around march of 2025.. so actually longer than a year ago lol
Posted on 10/24/26 at 11:54 pm to FLTech
quote:
It was actually around march of 2025.. so actually longer than a year ago lol
Heh. Well.
I guess that pre-emptively strikes the trolls on that !
Posted on 10/25/26 at 12:02 am to FLTech
I hope you are correct, but will it matter? Dems will win the midterms and none of the voters will care about any of this. We are headed to socialism if we don’t keep Dems out of office.
Posted on 10/25/26 at 12:05 am to FLTech
The video doesn't say what Love me when im gone says.
Posted on 10/25/26 at 12:14 am to FLTech
Uranium does have a unique scientific "fingerprint," but the claim that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama sold U.S. uranium to Russia, which was then smuggled to Iran, is factually incorrect. Investigations and independent fact-checkers have repeatedly shown that no such transfer of domestic uranium occurred,
'
Independent investigations, congressional probes, and fact-checking organizations have confirmed that no U.S. uranium from the Uranium One deal was sold or smuggled to Iran.
The claim conflates the 2010 approval of the Uranium One acquisition by a Russian state company with separate, unrelated events.
Key Facts and Findings
• No Export of Uranium to Russia or Iran: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and independent fact-checkers confirmed that the commercial agreement did not authorize the export of domestic uranium out of the United States. Uranium One was not licensed to export uranium to Russia, let alone Iran.
• The "Fingerprint" Misconception: While uranium does possess unique geological and isotopic signatures (often referred to as a "fingerprint") that allow scientists to trace its origin, no U.S. domestic uranium from these facilities has ever been detected in Iran's nuclear program.
• Collective Regulatory Approval: The acquisition of Uranium One by Russia's Rosatom required the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). This committee consists of nine federal agencies, not just the Department of State.
No single individual—including then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or President Barack Obama—had the unilateral authority to approve or veto the sale.
• No Material Impact on U.S. Nuclear Supplies: The uranium remained in the ground in the United States under domestic regulatory control, utilized strictly for domestic commercial nuclear power production.
'
Independent investigations, congressional probes, and fact-checking organizations have confirmed that no U.S. uranium from the Uranium One deal was sold or smuggled to Iran.
The claim conflates the 2010 approval of the Uranium One acquisition by a Russian state company with separate, unrelated events.
Key Facts and Findings
• No Export of Uranium to Russia or Iran: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and independent fact-checkers confirmed that the commercial agreement did not authorize the export of domestic uranium out of the United States. Uranium One was not licensed to export uranium to Russia, let alone Iran.
• The "Fingerprint" Misconception: While uranium does possess unique geological and isotopic signatures (often referred to as a "fingerprint") that allow scientists to trace its origin, no U.S. domestic uranium from these facilities has ever been detected in Iran's nuclear program.
• Collective Regulatory Approval: The acquisition of Uranium One by Russia's Rosatom required the approval of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). This committee consists of nine federal agencies, not just the Department of State.
No single individual—including then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or President Barack Obama—had the unilateral authority to approve or veto the sale.
• No Material Impact on U.S. Nuclear Supplies: The uranium remained in the ground in the United States under domestic regulatory control, utilized strictly for domestic commercial nuclear power production.
Posted on 10/25/26 at 12:16 am to FLTech
People should already be hanging
Posted on 10/25/26 at 1:53 am to Eurocat
quote:
Eurocat
LOL.
quote:
independent fact-checkers
Ok, bow that definitely makes you retarded
Posted on 10/25/26 at 2:48 am to Eurocat
One, the Committee of Foreign Investment is not some jury of peers who dont know each other. Hillary's largest donor to the clinton foundation Frank Giustra wanted the company, you think ANYONE is going to tell her no?
Remember this is the SAME committee that agreed to let the chinese buy sat guidance technology to the chinese under bills watch who then funneled money to him, its nothing new for ole hils.
Two, who gives a shat if it was our uranium, uranium, like money is fungible, the fact is she approved the sale knowing Uranium One was going to be flipped to the russians.
Its akin to them saying, no the billions of unfrozen assets they wont use for weapons. Of course not, they will use it to balance their budget THEN use their money that is freed up to buy the weapons, its fungible.
Life is a circle. So we give the chinese and russians the tools. The MIC screams the chini have a new super duper tool and we need another half a trillion in the budget, they get the money kick back a few bucks to the playas in our govt and everyone is happy.....except the 330 million Americans.
Remember this is the SAME committee that agreed to let the chinese buy sat guidance technology to the chinese under bills watch who then funneled money to him, its nothing new for ole hils.
Two, who gives a shat if it was our uranium, uranium, like money is fungible, the fact is she approved the sale knowing Uranium One was going to be flipped to the russians.
Its akin to them saying, no the billions of unfrozen assets they wont use for weapons. Of course not, they will use it to balance their budget THEN use their money that is freed up to buy the weapons, its fungible.
Life is a circle. So we give the chinese and russians the tools. The MIC screams the chini have a new super duper tool and we need another half a trillion in the budget, they get the money kick back a few bucks to the playas in our govt and everyone is happy.....except the 330 million Americans.
Posted on 10/25/26 at 3:10 am to FLTech
quote:
It was actually around march of 2025.. so actually longer than a year ago lol
I searched Google for "Iran suspending nuclear program" and the most recent news was 6 months ago.
I hope it's true.
Posted on 10/25/26 at 5:31 am to FLTech
quote:
I just listen to very reliable and very trustworthy podcasters (who have been 100% spot on correct about everything for the last few years)
Posted on 10/25/26 at 6:42 am to FLTech
quote:
treason
I’m really getting tired of this word getting thrown around so much when no politician ever had or will be charged with this. It’s the carrot
Posted on 10/25/26 at 7:21 am to FLTech
quote:
I just listen to very reliable and very trustworthy podcasters
If someone says it into their phone and posts it on the internet, that makes it all true.
This post was edited on 10/25/26 at 7:22 am
Posted on 10/25/26 at 7:28 am to FLTech
Adding to my trove of bookmarks to go through at the end of trumps term
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News