- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I find the contradiction of Q facts and Q resistance interesting.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:46 am to BugAC
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:46 am to BugAC
quote:
Ginsburg has been replaced by a man because her skin sank compared to photos of her when she was younger than she is now, is boarding the crazy train.
It's certainly outlandish and flies in the face of what would be normal circumstances, I agree.
Now, all things being equal, let's look at the subject of the outlandish claims:
Do you agree that RBG is held up by the liberal theology as the Virgin Mary of modern liberalism?
If RBG is as important to liberal Democrats as many of us believe her to be, then it also stands to reason that should anything happen to her, then the left would be devastated. Not just her SCOTUS seat, mind you. This would be a gut punch to almost every liberal activist in the nation.
Nov. 9, 2016 will be a walk in the park, compared to the day that it's announced that RBG died. Liberals will LOSE THEIR MINDS.
All that said, it stand to reason that IF (speculation only) something had happened to her and she were either incapable of performing her duties as an Associate Justice of SCOTUS, or had straight-up died, there would be a benefit to the overarching liberal cause to delay release of this info for as long as possible.
This is where the body double, deep fake talk comes from.
Not saying I believe all of it, just that I see where it would be an important strategic move.
Remember, they never thought HRC would lose.
2
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:47 am to MrCarton
quote:Assange is who Q is copying off of. Assange dropped five eyes details and our evil CIA as a shadow govt. The Q pied piper psyops get things in the news or old pictures. Assange was the real deal drop, boom, no riddles, as you said. Also Q was FBIAnon, Megs, Q, then all got 'compromised' from 4 chan to 8 chan, then another Q. This tells me it is a game.
That said, it's really impossible to know who is running this Q LARP. Could it be malicious? Maybe, but I doubt it. It's probably just some hilarious dudes fricking around with understandably desperate trump voters. What I do know is that everything about Q matches the scammer/fortune teller model, and nothing about him implies genuine access to information. The desperation level is so high, that it's not hard to run this game.
I think it's pretty clear that there are ways to test Q for genuine access, and even more clear is that nobody has any interest in breaking the spell. People who are legit don't act like Q, they act like Julian Assange. Like him or not, JA has the goods, and even his critics don't often dispute that.
They justify GTMO NAS military tribunals; because the base is finally getting new buildings and piers after 40 years.
quote:This is it spot on. The few remaining in the Q thread don't want the fantasy gone. I think they are good people who hang out on the dark web chans so long they turn into them.
I think it's pretty clear that there are ways to test Q for genuine access, and even more clear is that nobody has any interest in breaking the spell.
It is foolishness. They get so mad when not all bow to it and c/o 'shills' when they push the Q narrative in the poli board when their Q thread is ignored.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:53 am to VoxDawg
Can you post the pool table, oval office, AF1, and pen pics? Seriously, I only follow Q on twitter as I read my wall and I am not up to speed.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:56 am to cajunangelle
It'll take some time to review. The images are tougher to search on QMap.pub than the text of the posts.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:18 pm to TSLG
quote:
You can't say that those notes didn't get an eery reaction from those people.
A guy in his mom's basement put this video together, but that's not the point. Look at Jeb and Laura. Something very serious got to them.
LINK
This one interests me to no end. Has there been a theory that is more believed than the others?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:44 pm to moneyg
quote:
This one interests me to no end. Has there been a theory that is more believed than the others?
Not that I've seen.
It blows my mind that nobody from the media has ever asked anything about these envelopes.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:52 pm to MrCarton
quote:
It's probably just some hilarious dudes fricking around with understandably desperate trump voters.
People tend to only get desperate when they are losing/have lost, so.........
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:54 pm to TSLG
Pence's wife got an envelope.
quote:
What Was In The Mystery Envelopes That Hillary, Biden And Pence Received At Bush’s Funeral?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:57 pm to VoxDawg
Thanks. I was not being a smartass.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 12:59 pm to cajunangelle
I still can't find you on the T
Posted on 7/23/19 at 1:05 pm to BugAC
quote:Exactly and the video posted of the deep fake RBG is silly.
They are the same. It's called aging.
Here is video RBG is at the funeral. If it was somehow faked she was there they would have had to have deep faked many, many news videos.
LINK
This post was edited on 7/23/19 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 7/23/19 at 1:37 pm to Ham Solo
Why doesn't Q retract false statements?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 1:46 pm to VoxDawg
VoxDawg
I cannot imagine that the conservative judges on the bench would not know the difference. The deep state cannot be that deep.
quote:
It's certainly outlandish and flies in the face of what would be normal circumstances, I agree.
All that said, it stand to reason that IF (speculation only) something had happened to her and she were either incapable of performing her duties as an Associate Justice of SCOTUS, or had straight-up died, there would be a benefit to the overarching liberal cause to delay release of this info for as long as possible.
This is where the body double, deep fake talk comes from.
I cannot imagine that the conservative judges on the bench would not know the difference. The deep state cannot be that deep.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 1:57 pm to BugAC
quote:
You can easily say this without using pictures. The pictures make you sound crazy.
WTH? Vox supplies picture to demonstrate his assertion and you are going to chastise him for that???
Posted on 7/23/19 at 2:01 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
they would have had to have deep faked many, many news videos.
I can think of less than 6 alleged instances where she's been in "public" since her Dec 8, 2018 surgery.
If you're finding many, many videos of her interacting in public, you're a far better researcher than the rest of us.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 2:03 pm to Sunbeam
quote:
I'm sure he is. I believe it as well
If you truly believe RBG is dead and has been replaced you are insane. That is the most absurd statement that I think I have ever heard. You Q people are crazy man and have fallen victim to a masterful LARP that gives vague sources of information and sends yall down some conspiracy rabbit hole.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 2:11 pm to VoxDawg
quote:I meant the Justice Stevens funeral with RBG. There are many videos and it went LIVE. How can you fake all of this? The deepfake video was made in slow mo. Yet many LIVE versions don't show people passing through a rope as the deepfake video does.
I can think of less than 6 alleged instances where she's been in "public" since her Dec 8, 2018 surgery.
If you're finding many, many videos of her interacting in public, you're a far better researcher than the rest of us.
This post was edited on 7/23/19 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 7/23/19 at 2:13 pm to dafif
quote:
The deep state cannot be that deep.
Can't it, though? One would HOPE that if anything nefarious happened to Antonin Scalia, someone like Thomas would speak up, right?
What's to say that Thomas or someone else doesn't get taken out, too?
Podesta had some non-contextual email about 'wet works' let than a week before Scalia died:
Posted on 7/23/19 at 2:18 pm to VoxDawg
What is the implication on predicting the death of McCain and HW? How would an insider be able to predict a death unless it was planned to happen at a specific time? Is that the implication?
Also, sorry for a day one question, but what does Q stand for?
Also, sorry for a day one question, but what does Q stand for?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 2:19 pm to cajunangelle
I just saw the Twitter link to the purported DF video today, so I'm personally early in the process, taking a look at everything.
For the longest time, over the holidays, it was looking more and more like she was doornail dead, and they were trying to hide it.
I'm back into the camp of the HIGHLY skeptical with respect to RBG, her health, and identity, in general. If it were any other AJ, you wouldn't see this sort of effort to cover, had something happened to her.
For the longest time, over the holidays, it was looking more and more like she was doornail dead, and they were trying to hide it.
I'm back into the camp of the HIGHLY skeptical with respect to RBG, her health, and identity, in general. If it were any other AJ, you wouldn't see this sort of effort to cover, had something happened to her.
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News