- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I find the contradiction of Q facts and Q resistance interesting.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:08 am to MrCarton
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:08 am to MrCarton
One of my favorite piece's of evidence us the Christmas time photo of the elevator in Trump tower! Stocking hanging had a big Q on it and the Q was a purposely altered O! Notice Santa was holding a freaking hammer in one of his hands.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:10 am to VoxDawg
quote:
VoxDawg
That post proves my point. Common sense gives way to conspiracy when it is not needed.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:12 am to MrCarton
quote:
they act like Julian Assange. Like him or not, JA has the goods, and even his critics don't often dispute that.
You and Q are in agreement on something, then.
quote:
It's probably just some hilarious dudes fricking around with understandably desperate trump voters.
Would these hilarious dudes be more like or less like the usual hilarious dudes who frick around with understandably desperate Trump voters with original photos from AF1, Camp David and/or the Oval Office?
You know, since those are all locations that hilarious dudes typically frick around with people?
quote:
everything about Q matches the scammer/fortune teller model, and nothing about him implies genuine access to information.
You could've just said that you're not familiar with the information provided by Q. That would at least give you an eventual out.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:14 am to BugAC
quote:
That post proves my point. Common sense gives way to conspiracy when it is not needed.
Not my content. Just sharing what followed from the OP of the Twitter video.
Would you agree that those appear to be two different women, or are you of the opinion that they are the same?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:14 am to VoxDawg
quote:
if you don't believe an anon poster sharing publicly searchable information
This is one (of many) places where you immediately go off the rails. Your premise is that Q presents himself as a fountain of exclusive information. That's never been the case, nor has he portrayed himself as such.
No, that's literally the opposite of what I said.
quote:
(He's also not a Magic 8-Ball, no matter how much you, Mike Rothschild and Will Sommers would love to paint him as such).
:bigsigh:
quote:
Apparently your liberal mind virus has rendered your critical thinking abilities null and void, because you're under the mistaken impression that Q is in the prediction business. We can't help willful ignorance.
Q is in the fortune teller/palm reader business. You are in the loyal, likable mark business.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:14 am to Decatur
quote:
That’s a joke, right?
A joke? You think old people with bad teeth just go to the dentist and have new ones made?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:14 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Would you agree that those appear to be two different women, or are you of the opinion that they are the same?
They are the same. It's called aging.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:16 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
and nothing has happened
JE arrest is nothing? NK is nothing? Saudi Arabia purge is nothing?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:16 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Would these hilarious dudes be more like or less like the usual hilarious dudes who frick around with understandably desperate Trump voters with original photos from AF1, Camp David and/or the Oval Office?
Entirely possible, since it's anonymous.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:17 am to omegaman66
quote:
JE arrest is nothing? NK is nothing? Saudi Arabia purge is nothing?
Correct.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:18 am to VoxDawg
quote:
You could've just said that you're not familiar with the information provided by Q. That would at least give you an eventual out.
"Q doesn't pretend to be an oracle, he is there to make you think!"
"Lol, nibba, you don't know about the Q oracle?"
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:19 am to Esquire
quote:
A joke? You think old people with bad teeth just go to the dentist and have new ones made?
Good Lord, man. There is no possible way you can tell her dental history by comparing varying photos of different age and varying lighting.
You have a want to believe, therefore Q must all be true.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:20 am to VoxDawg
Are you suggesting that the RBG is dead and has been replaced by an impersonator? Based on some pictures on twitter? LOL!
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:28 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
Are you suggesting that the RBG is dead and has been replaced by an impersonator? Based on some pictures on twitter? LOL!
Not only that, but an old man. I mean, did you see the teeth?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:30 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
Are you suggesting that the RBG is dead and has been replaced by an impersonator? Based on some pictures on twitter? LOL!
No, I'm saying something doesn't add up with respect to the fact that she's been largely shielded from the media, save some TMZ footage, particularly in light of her failing health.
Either she has access to some kind of top-shelf cancer treatments that aren't available to the common man, or her recovery from about half a dozen types of cancer is one for the record books.
We have a concept in the Q Thread that "Notables are not endorsements," which means that just because you bring a particular bit of info into the thread, that doesn't mean you're all in with its premise or any implied conclusion. We do this to foster conversation. I've posted things that have later been debunked, as have likely everyone who posts in the thread on a regular basis.
There's no danger in speculation and consideration like their is in refusing to discuss.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:34 am to VoxDawg
quote:
No, I'm saying something doesn't add up with respect to the fact that she's been largely shielded from the media
You can easily say this without using pictures. The pictures make you sound crazy.
quote:
Either she has access to some kind of top-shelf cancer treatments that aren't available to the common man
Possible. She is in the upper echelon of societal figures.
quote:
or her recovery from about half a dozen types of cancer is one for the record books.
Not impossible. Cancer is very strange.
quote:
We do this to foster conversation. I've posted things that have later been debunked, as have likely everyone who posts in the thread on a regular basis.
As long as you're not saying, "THIS PROVES IT!" Makes for interesting discussion.
quote:
There's no danger in speculation and consideration like their is in refusing to discuss.
True, but saying Ginsburg has been replaced by a man because her skin sank compared to photos of her when she was younger than she is now, is boarding the crazy train.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:37 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
Are you suggesting that the RBG is dead and has been replaced by an impersonator? Based on some pictures on twitter? LOL!
I'm sure he is. I believe it as well.
What the question is, since everyone knows - me, the Deep State, ... the Trump Administration, why is this charade still going on?
Frankly unless:
1) These photos were doctored to change eye color - for some reason, or
2) RBG decided to get trendy and change her eye color
What exactly do you base your assertation these pictures show the same person?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:39 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Only that we weren't getting the full story
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:43 am to Sunbeam
quote:
What exactly do you base your assertation these pictures show the same person?
Common sense. Again, you are comparing photographs of varying age and varying light of a person who has aged.
Popular
Back to top



0





