re: How soon before Trump starts arresting crooked lawyers and Judges for obstruction?

quote:

---

There are too many lawsuits to keep up with

---

Yea. Lucky that the number of lawsuits has zero relevance to anything concerning logic.


DOGE EO Jan 20th

Sec. 3. DOGE Structure. (a) Reorganization and Renaming of the United States Digital Service. The United States Digital Service is hereby publicly renamed as the United States DOGE Service (USDS) and shall be established in the Executive Office of the President.

(b) Establishment of a Temporary Organization. There shall be a USDS Administrator established in the Executive Office of the President who shall report to the White House Chief of Staff. There is further established within USDS, in accordance with section 3161 of title 5, United States Code, a temporary organization known as “the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization”. The U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization shall be headed by the USDS Administrator and shall be dedicated to advancing the President’s 18-month DOGE agenda. The U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization shall terminate on July 4, 2026. The termination of the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization shall not be interpreted to imply the termination, attenuation, or amendment of any other authority or provision of this order.

(c) DOGE Teams. In consultation with USDS, each Agency Head shall establish within their respective Agencies a DOGE Team of at least four employees, which may include Special Government Employees, hired or assigned within thirty days of the date of this Order. Agency Heads shall select the DOGE Team members in consultation with the USDS Administrator. Each DOGE Team will typically include one DOGE Team Lead, one engineer, one human resources specialist, and one attorney. Agency Heads shall ensure that DOGE Team Leads coordinate their work with USDS and advise their respective Agency Heads on implementing the President ‘s DOGE Agenda.


I'm sure you have seen some of the EO here many some have not.
I'm sure you have heard as well whom exactly is doing all the squealing.

That's why there is an appeals process to address perceived errors in the lower courts. That's the process. There should not be a penalty for decisions the party in power doesn't like. If the lower court can cite legal precedent....which they should then it's a matter of opinion which is what the process is designed to do. Not be a rubber stamp on the executive branch .

If the problem continues to exist, there is a remedy. It's called the legislative process. Congress should try it sometime instead of deferring to the executive or the courts.....or spending their time hitting up people and corporate types up for money