re: How soon before "conservatives" call Matt Walsh a Leftist and want the DW to fire him?

quote:

---

I’m sure Hegseth would be glad to dole out these blueprints and classified information to the media just so everyone knows what the plan is.

---

What's ironic is it wouldn't be the first time

This is interesting to me. There's a lot of Trump line-towers who eventually a lightbulb switches on and they decide it's time to start opposing the POTUS. I'm not sure if there's some kind of financial interest, or if they just don't know how to read the room, but you have to understand something. These people are entertainers. They're paid to keep your interest, engage you, trick you into thinking it's news and entertain you. That's what this is. That's what all this is.

MTG switched because of monetary gain. The Hodge Twins have switched for monetary gain. And it's a massive miscalculation, somehow thinking for one second Trump's core base is going to go along with them. They're going to turn on them, and it will be hilarious. They will see you as the enemy and will viciously pull you down to earth. Matt Walsh is a smart guy. Somewhere someone is telling him something that is inherently incorrect. He seems to be kind of just dipping his toe in the water to see what happens. This is the moment. Pay attention. This is where a lot of falls from grace are destined to occur.

How familiar are you w/ Walsh? What has he ever said in the past that is counter to his post today? There may be something, but I'm not aware of it.

quote:

---

Are you saying only military generals should be allowed to question/critique what our military does, or a president's decision on what the military does?

I'm legit trying to understand if that's what you mean.

---

Yeah, kind of actually. The only reason anyone would bring up randos opinions is because that rando agrees with them. We probably know very little of the actual discussions that happened between US forces and Iranian Freedom forces.

It's more about who I would trust more.

Who would you give more credence to in when discussing military action? Whoopie Goldberg or a military general? A social media influencer or a military general? A message board poster or a military general? Rachel Maddow or a military general? Hannity or a military general?

I mean that makes sense right?

I guess it would have to be a MAGA general though... ain't listening to leftist generals like Milley.

Did he run this by Ben?

If there were anyone to do it, it's would be the administration that is in charge now. I still have my doubts, but we'll see.

Boomer cons won't like this.

quote:

---

The other problem in this war of choice, is that it never went through congress.

---

That is incorrect. Trump sent official notification to Congress today.

That might have been some hours late, but the spirit of the law is being followed so far if not the letter of it.

Now that Congress has been notified he's got 90 days to get in and out of Iran all on his own without the War Powers Act being violated.

if a Hardliner regains power and continues Iran's path of ignoring the US and UN's demands of its nuclear programs, are we going to follow Israel's lead and attack them again?

that's what youre commiting to.
That would be difficult even if we did commit boots on the ground.

quote:

---

There’s a difference between Matt Walsh giving his opinion that he disagrees with Iran and a Dave Smith type emotionally sky screaming that Trump is a traitor

---