- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How Long Before Rob Uses "Indictments" To Hit DJT?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:58 am to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 6/9/23 at 7:58 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
This is so fricking weak. Show me where I clamored for any of that.
Where was this concern trolling over unprecedented political/partisan retribution when people wanted her in jail?
It's hard to argue it was unprecedented when this was a major movement 7 years ago.
1
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
cromagnum
Is that like a plus-sized cro-magnon?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:02 am to Flats
Hey if spellcheck doesn't catch it, I won't.
This is where I tell you the hidden meaning of what was REALLY implied by that intentional mistake.
This is where I tell you the hidden meaning of what was REALLY implied by that intentional mistake.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:06 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I mean, I just think the whole ‘muh, what would Trump do if it was someone else?’ is completely pointless, bordering on completely meaningless, when we are talking about something that should be seen as so completely inconceivable in happening to ANYONE under our political system as we have always understood it.
Trumpets are criticizing his opponent for his (perceived or real) lack of outrage over this lawfare BS. It's completely pointless to ask if you think Trump would behave in the same way, based on his history?
Look, if you just think he's been done so wrong he deserves the nomination, just say that. A few people have, more probably think it. But if you're attempting to put a checkmark in the "negative" column for DeSantis, it's not pointless to ask if Trump would do any better in that column. In fact, it's pretty dishonest to your self not to ask the question, unless you're "ride or die" and then all discussion about them as candidates is pointless.
This post was edited on 6/9/23 at 8:18 am
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:07 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I don’t find this a persuasive line of argument when we are witnessing something so completely unprecedented in the annals of American politics.
You’re asking for unquestioned loyalty and solidarity to someone who would be coming off the top rope if the roles were reversed. The indictment might be political BS, but that doesn’t mean any of the candidates should bend the knee and lock arms at Mar-A-Lago for someone who would go scorched earth on them on a moment’s notice.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:09 am to DotBling
Ron better pick the right side here because once he becomes the frontrunner, this lawfare bazooka will be aimed at him.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:09 am to FairhopeTider
quote:
someone who would be coming off the top rope if the roles were reversed.
They know. They love that about him, they just sometimes find the need to make excuses for it.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
here? Not true.
But you being truthful is a hard thing.
It is true. Hhtm, tigerhold and more.
quote:
Just because he disagreed with a grifter you posted about doesn't mean he's "giddy"
No he stated he will be happy to see him in jail.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:13 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
He literally can’t do anything about the DOJ or Trump unless he is president.
He literally avoid the truth about it all.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:13 am to David_DJS
The left isn’t going to be a factor in who I vote for the Republican primary. Make no mistake. Trump is a threat to the status quo. I never thought he had a chance to become president. When he did, I was flabbergasted at the relentless attacks on the man and his supporters.
As I’ve posted before, I’m taking this personally. They are doing this to me and my family.
As I’ve posted before, I’m taking this personally. They are doing this to me and my family.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
concern trolling
I WANT everybody in jail for the most part. Or just gone or completely meaningless and irrelevant to my daily existence.
I understand we operate in a certain system, or at least used to.
If the realization that we no longer do now is “concern trolling” then you got me, I guess.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:15 am to DotBling
Probably never.
How long until Donnie uses Covid to hit DeSantis?
How long until Donnie uses Covid to hit DeSantis?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
Are you really comparing this to Hillary?
Holy shite.
Holy shite.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:37 am to Flats
quote:
Trumpets are criticizing his opponent for his (perceived or real) lack of outrage over this lawfare BS. It's completely pointless to ask if you think Trump would behave in the same way, based on his history?
Look, if you just think he's been done so wrong he deserves the nomination, just say that. A few people have, more probably think it. But if you're attempting to put a checkmark in the "negative" column for DeSantis, it's not pointless to ask if Trump would do any better in that column. In fact, it's pretty dishonest to your self not to ask the question, unless you're "ride or die" and then all discussion about them as candidates is pointless.
God, you are myopic as can be if you think any of this is anything close to the thrust of my point.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:39 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
God, you are myopic as can be if you think any of this is anything close to the thrust of my point.
Also you:
quote:
I mean, I just think the whole ‘muh, what would Trump do if it was someone else?’ is completely pointless
Me:
quote:
It's completely pointless to ask if you think Trump would behave in the same way, based on his history?
Help me out; what is the thrust of your post?
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:40 am to the808bass
I was told that so much as calling for the investigation of a presidential candidate was interference and watched a sitting president get impeached for it. I was also told that having possession of illegal classified documents was a violation that “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case” against.
Where did those standards go? This is either wrong or it isn’t.
Where did those standards go? This is either wrong or it isn’t.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:40 am to Jjdoc
quote:
He literally avoid the truth about it all.
quote:
The weaponization of federal law enforcement represents a mortal threat to a free society.
We have for years witnessed an uneven application of the law depending upon political affiliation.
Why so zealous in pursuing Trump yet so passive about Hillary or Hunter?
The DeSantis administration will bring accountability to the DOJ, excise political bias and end weaponization once and for all.
wat
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:41 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Ron better pick the right side here
quote:
The weaponization of federal law enforcement represents a mortal threat to a free society.
We have for years witnessed an uneven application of the law depending upon political affiliation.
Why so zealous in pursuing Trump yet so passive about Hillary or Hunter?
The DeSantis administration will bring accountability to the DOJ, excise political bias and end weaponization once and for all.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 8:44 am to Fun Bunch
Good for him. Vivek said essentially the same thing, and even qualified his statement that Trumps demise would benefit him greatly.
Posted on 6/9/23 at 9:03 am to Vacherie Saint
ok. And?
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News