- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/3/21 at 7:14 am to Tigers1984
This is shortsighted.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 7:17 am to Tigers1984
quote:
How is ACB any different than Ruth Bader Ginsburg?
ACB is an excellent jurist and doesn't try to legislate from the bench. Not what most people here wanted but she's doing what a great justice should do.
The downvote arrow is to the right
Posted on 3/3/21 at 7:18 am to burger bearcat
quote:Not good on the economy? Tax cuts? Quiet in the Middle East? A push for less reliance on Chinese manufacturing?
but isn't good for much else
He did have subpar hires, but I'm not certain he had much to choose from. As for Barrett, we cannot pass judgment for several years...unless you want to be emotional and in the moment like a leftist.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 7:20 am to UTMaverick
quote:
I think Trump relied on those around him to select his judicial nominees
This is the problem, and why I am leaning towards moving on to someone else for 2024. Trump is good at punching back, but the day to day, and nuts and bolts part of the job, he was not effective and relied completely on the people who he was surrounded by. So in that case, being able to effectively bring in the right people was the most important part of his job.
By the way, Trump should continue to be in the picture and hopefully help start an alternative media empire. There is plenty of good Trump can still do, but DeSantis has proven to be effective at actually getting things done in a somewhat purple state, and not just talk about it.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 7:20 am to John Gotti
quote:I don't think enough people here realize that while a progressive judge only rules one way, activist, a conservative can rule one of two ways, activist in a conservative manner or originalist, which can lead to some victories for the Left.
ACB is an excellent jurist and doesn't try to legislate from the bench. Not what most people here wanted but she's doing what a great justice should do
This post was edited on 3/3/21 at 7:21 am
Posted on 3/3/21 at 7:21 am to burger bearcat
Another low iq poster
Posted on 3/3/21 at 7:24 am to Tigers1984
quote:
I used to feel like ACB wasn’t a person who would sit on the sidelines during a stolen election.... man I was fricking wrong.
Look, I voted for Trump in 2020. I also believe it's safe to say that the election was interfered with, whether you believe in outright ballot harvesting or simply the media hyping Covid to favor their candidate.
However, even if the democratic establishment did the former, it's incredibly dangerous to have the Supreme Court simply overturn election results, because you are setting a precedent. In short, the threat to pack the court would have been an outright certainty the next time they gained power. Biden/Harris is a bitter pill to swallow, but gaining this election by knowingly sacrificing the entire government system of checks and balances the next time around is basically pulling the plug on the entire republic for a short term gain, and the reason they risked it was because the democratic establishment knew this.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 7:26 am to burger bearcat
quote:
He sucked at hiring people, appointing people, and endorsing people.
Trump would have been better off picking normal people off the street.
Did Pennsylvania have a law against counting late votes? Yes.
Did they count late votes? Yes.
Did they break the law? Yes.
Not that fricking hard to figure out.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 7:31 am to Tangineck
quote:
it's incredibly dangerous to have the Supreme Court simply overturn election results
This is never what was asked, and you are simply parroting a CNN talking point. The problem is CNN controls the narrative to even conservatives like yourself.
The case was about determining who has the right to change election laws in a state. The SC could have ruled that the states acted illegally, but the power to make any changes was always in control of the legislatures. The SC would have provided precdent and cover for the legislatures to act, to at minimum make changes in future elections.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 8:10 am to Jake88
quote:
don't think enough people here realize that while a progressive judge only rules one way, activist, a conservative can rule one of two ways, activist in a conservative manner or originalist, which can lead to some victories for the Left.
Agree.
Sadly that ends up being unilateral disarmament. A conservative judge follows the law and the Constitution even if the outcome sucks. A prog judge rules based on the desired result no matter how much pretzel logic is required.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 8:33 am to Tigers1984
Normally, I'd chide you people for rejecting her for not giving you everything you want, all the time. However, I can't remember the last democrat appointment who ever went against leftist orthodoxy.
This has been the Democrat/GOPe song and dance for 20 years. The left purges its ranks of moderates and fills spots with zealot followers, but the right appoints "sensible thinkers" who are constantly, "compassionately" willing to cave to the left's agenda.
This has been the Democrat/GOPe song and dance for 20 years. The left purges its ranks of moderates and fills spots with zealot followers, but the right appoints "sensible thinkers" who are constantly, "compassionately" willing to cave to the left's agenda.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 8:34 am to Tigers1984
quote:
How is ACB any different than Ruth Bader Ginsburg?
I’m going to give her the chance to provide some opinions before slamming her for not doing everything she could to overturn the election.
Do we even know if she voted on whether or not to hear them?
Posted on 3/3/21 at 8:39 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Trump is fun when he is poking left-tards in the eye, but isn't good for much else.
so no good for america first policy? fn moron
Posted on 3/3/21 at 8:41 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Another low iq poster
yup. another bi polar policy ignorant dumbass
Posted on 3/3/21 at 8:44 am to Seldom Seen
quote:
People here supported her just cause she was from Louisiana even though she's not from Louisiana she's from New Orleans.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 9:11 am to Tigers1984
This may explain why the supreme court voted the way it did on the election cases. LINK
Posted on 3/3/21 at 9:28 am to burger bearcat
quote:
He sucked at hiring people,
nope.
quote:
appointing people, and endorsing people.
nope and nope.
quote:
Trump is fun when he is poking left-tards in the eye, but isn't good for much else.
Most ignorant comment I have seen lately.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 9:29 am to Tigers1984
quote:Approximately 1/2 of SCOTUS decisions are either unanimous or decided 8-1 or 7-2.
How is ACB any different than Ruth Bader Ginsburg?
Could have just left Ruth’s dead corpse in her seat and she would have done the same thing as Amy Coney Barrett and the rest of the USSC justices.
Why? Because the law is usually that clear.
Legally, Trump did not have a leg to stand on. Deal with it, and get to work LEGISLATIVELY fixing the problems.
Posted on 3/3/21 at 9:32 am to Seldom Seen
quote:
People here supported her just cause she was from Louisiana even though she's not from Louisiana she's from New Orleans.
She’s from Metairie
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News