- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How Dangerous is Russia’s New Nuclear-Tipped Air-to-Air Missile?
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:45 pm to lake chuck fan
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:45 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Meh... whatever Russia or China has, we have also.
They got it from us... harsh truth
0
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:47 pm to John Barron
quote:
After doing more research
Don't you dare say that, you haven't done research ever for any of your posts on this site.
If you think queries to a LLM is research, then you probably think eating random items in your house is cooking.
No one has used a bomber formation since what Vietnam?
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:49 pm to j1897
quote:
Bro not a chance, this is russia beating their drums.
I am Generally curious why you feel this way. This is not coming from Russia. This is based of a U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency Report
"The nuclear-tipped R-37M air-to-air missile, as reported by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency in its 2025 Worldwide Threat Assessment, represents a significant advancement in Russia’s aerospace capabilities due to its unique combination of long-range, hypersonic speed, and nuclear warhead."
Posted on 5/22/25 at 10:53 pm to John Barron
The .ain't delivery of an air to air missile is a 50 fricking year old plane... yeah, nobody is worried about that shite.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:01 pm to Narax
quote:
Don't you dare say that, you haven't done research ever for any of your posts on this site.
Incorrect. All my topics I post are well thought out and sourced by information I have read and researched that has confirmed or expanded my deep knowledge base.
quote:
If you think queries to a LLM is research
Once Again Narax, This is Incorrect...
Systematic Inquiry: Research involves seeking answers to specific questions or exploring a topic systematically. If you’re asking Grok targeted questions (e.g., about the R-37M missile or Cold War nuclear tests) to gain knowledge or understand a subject, this aligns with the exploratory or descriptive goals of research.
Data Collection: Grok provides information synthesized from various sources, including web data, X posts, and its knowledge base. Reviewing these responses is akin to collecting data from a secondary source, a common research practice.
Learning and Synthesis: If you’re analyzing, comparing, or synthesizing Grok’s answers to form conclusions or deepen your understanding (e.g., assessing the danger of the R-37M or fallout risks), this mirrors the interpretive aspect of research.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:09 pm to John Barron
quote:
Incorrect. All my topics I post are well thought out and sourced by information I have read and researched that has confirmed or expanded my deep knowledge base.
You try so hard to be a real boy.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:28 pm to Bengalbio
quote:
You try so hard to be a real boy
Not really. Just being myself and everything comes Naturally. I know that is hard to understand for a Liberal Angel Reese Dick Rider
quote:
This is great for the WNBA and the Angel Reese brand.
That foul and reaction just made Angel Reese some money.
LINK
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:36 pm to John Barron
It's a theoretical answer to our stealth tech. They don't need to be precise.
It's a threat without much behind it. They're not gonna be nuking themselves to stop airplanes. too many better, proven ways to do it.
It's a threat without much behind it. They're not gonna be nuking themselves to stop airplanes. too many better, proven ways to do it.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:37 pm to John Barron
quote:
aligns with the exploratory or descriptive goals of research.
quote:
akin to collecting data from a secondary source, a common research practice.
quote:
mirrors the interpretive aspect of research.
Wow...
You posted something that three times says what idiocy you do is NOT research...
But you post it with the full confidence that only a man who has no idea what he is talking about can.
You obviously are aware of your lack of intelligence, you can't hold a conversation, and you limp along by quoting LLMs in hopes that it is true.
I guess you are vibe researching now....
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:44 pm to John Barron
quote:
Once Again Narax, This is Incorrect..
I think his point is you didn't do the research. The llm did the research. You're reading the cliff notes and not the book. There is nothing wrong with that but don't act like you researched anything.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 11:53 pm to Narax
quote:
you can't hold a conversation
Once Again Narax, This is Incorrect. We are holding a conversation right now. Just because you get frustrated when I provide sources and context to support my argument doesn't invalidate my ability to thoroughly embarrass you on a consistent basis. This is an informal conversation we are having which involves seeking and processing information to answer questions. Stop acting like this is some formal or academic research setting. It is a political message board
This post was edited on 5/23/25 at 12:05 am
Posted on 5/23/25 at 12:56 am to lake chuck fan
Personally I think some of these “UAP”s sightings are operated by us.
I’m pretty certain some of our contractors have reverse engineered some pretty awesome stuff.
So to have that kind of technology means no one wants to see your knuckles.
*I will say we don’t know exactly what they have either. But I heard Trump say very briefly that we had technology no one else in the world does or something like that sounding very confident.
Take it for what it’s worth with Trump but I believe it.
I’m pretty certain some of our contractors have reverse engineered some pretty awesome stuff.
So to have that kind of technology means no one wants to see your knuckles.
*I will say we don’t know exactly what they have either. But I heard Trump say very briefly that we had technology no one else in the world does or something like that sounding very confident.
Take it for what it’s worth with Trump but I believe it.
This post was edited on 5/23/25 at 1:00 am
Posted on 5/23/25 at 12:56 am to John Barron
"Nuclear-Tipped Air-to-Air Missile"
This is not new technology. Dig deeper.
You also need to dig deeper on the technology of the Russia "Hypersonic"
Missile. The sky is not falling.
What is your background with missile testing? I'm guessing zero.
This is not new technology. Dig deeper.
You also need to dig deeper on the technology of the Russia "Hypersonic"
Missile. The sky is not falling.
What is your background with missile testing? I'm guessing zero.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 2:36 am to theballguy
quote:
Not a surprise but China John says China and Russia are very dangerous.
In all seriousness, we have some stuff in our arsenal that is 50 years beyond this.
Man. He is such cuck for them.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 3:00 am to John Barron
quote:
Incorrect. All my topics I post are well thought out and sourced by information I have read and researched that has confirmed or expanded my deep knowledge base.
What is this shite?
Posted on 5/23/25 at 3:08 am to DMAN1968
quote:
What is this shite?
More Barron bullshite
This post was edited on 5/23/25 at 3:09 am
Posted on 5/23/25 at 5:20 am to John Barron
Russia can’t even achieve air-superiority in Ukraine.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 6:13 am to John Barron
Well, “the wider electromagnetic pulse” got my attention. So comforting to know that our best minds are hard at work spending our $ and building more lethal killing systems.
Posted on 5/23/25 at 6:16 am to John Barron
Everyone seems to always be working on some super secret awesome weapon but when you tune in you see the most lackluster military combat since ww2
There are levels to this game
There are levels to this game
Posted on 5/23/25 at 6:23 am to lake chuck fan
quote:doesn't work
Meh... whatever Russia or China has
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News