- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Horowitz's Investigators question Steele Dossier author, find him credible
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:31 pm to The Pirate King
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:31 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
I thought he couldn’t prosecute because he can’t indict a sitting president? T
Nah, that's in Vol 2 with the obstruction crimes.
I recommend that if you don't want to read the report, just wait until Mueller testifies before you assert knowledge of the report.
1
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:31 pm to Vacherie Saint
Acuurately stating that Devin Nunes sponsored the latest FISA re-up is a potshot?
No, I corrected a potshot
Sorry you're sore about Devvy
No, I corrected a potshot
Sorry you're sore about Devvy
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:32 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
with the obstruction crimes.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:32 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
They will say anything to make themselves believe they werent willful rubes.
"If it's what you say it is, I love it... especially later on in the summer".
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:33 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:Oh man boom!
"If it's what you say it is, I love it... especially later on in the summer".
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:41 pm to tigerinDC09
Oh baby! It's happening isnt it?!?!
Even juicy has come out of shameful hiatus to jump on board the Mueller testimony boner train! Im setting the dvr now.
Even juicy has come out of shameful hiatus to jump on board the Mueller testimony boner train! Im setting the dvr now.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:42 pm to Vacherie Saint
These morons forget that republicans gat to ask him questions too
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:44 pm to gthog61
It doesnt matter. He wont say anything new because hes already sais as much, and they will all go back to hardlegging the SDNY.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:44 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Someone called him a collusion truther and he had the nerve to ask for a link.
that's perfectThis post was edited on 7/9/19 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:45 pm to gthog61
Nadler already said he's going to try to limit questions due to time.
They will try to drive their narrative and that's it. This isn't about truth. It's to muddy the waters to hurt trump.
They think we don't see right through it.
They will try to drive their narrative and that's it. This isn't about truth. It's to muddy the waters to hurt trump.
They think we don't see right through it.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:47 pm to tigerinDC09
Yum yum. Gots anymo of them anonymous sauces that never pan out?
Posted on 7/9/19 at 1:48 pm to roadGator
Right.
Look at the little soundbytes they scavenged off of the Mueller press conference. They lived off of that for weeks.
That's all they want. Muh Russia is a lot like RBG. They just need to keep it alive.
Look at the little soundbytes they scavenged off of the Mueller press conference. They lived off of that for weeks.
That's all they want. Muh Russia is a lot like RBG. They just need to keep it alive.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 2:13 pm to tigerinDC09
I trust Politico as much as I trust the sources familiar with things in the WaPo. How many times were they found wanting in their accuracy?
Posted on 7/9/19 at 2:25 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:
Sorry to invade your safe space snowflake.
That’s rich coming from you. Irony, do you know the meaning? SMDH @ your ignorance.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 2:28 pm to tigerinDC09
Innocent man won't submit to interview by prosecutor though. HE KNOWS HOROWITZ CAN NOT INDICT OR PROSECUTE.
Posted on 7/9/19 at 2:40 pm to tigerinDC09
quote:1. No, it's not.
But actually ordering Mueller to be fired (as outlined in Vol 2) is illegal.
2. He didn't order McGhan to fire him. Mueller/Weissman purposely misinterpreted McGhan's testimony to only act like it did.
McGhan clarified that the report conveniently leaves out context around this statement. He said that everyone close to Trump was telling him that Mueller should not be the SC because they believed he has a conflict of interest. So his testimony of when Trump said, "IF Mueller has a conflict of interest, I want him gone. You need to fire him, Don.", is clearly in the context of "IF" there's a conflict of interest.
McGahn even said he didn't "refuse Trump's demand" out of defiance, he said that they all decided not to do it because of the "optics". McGahn even explained that if he had refused any Trump order out of defiance he would be fired. So the fact he wasn't fired is a clear indication that Trump was on board with the rationale for the decision.
quote:The request wasn't to "create a false memo", you jackass. It was Trump simply telling McGahn he needed to correct the record and clarify that the order to fire Mueller was contingent on Mueller having a conflict of interest. And, that they all also later agreed not to do it, Trump included.
Then asking McGhan to create a false memo to file to cover up that crime is yet another crime.
McGahn made this clear and yet Mueller and Weissman STILL omitted this very pertinent context surrounding this entire issue from the report. And not only omitted it, but then inferred that this may be construed as Obstruction when it's CLEARLY NOT when the surrounding context is included.
Which makes it very obvious that Mueller and Weissman are dishonest and purposely trying to manipulate a false inference.
And here's the biggest quagmire in the Left's bullshite narrative... How the hell would firing Mueller be obstruction anyways? Nothing would have changed. A new SC would have been appointed and the investigation would have continued seamlessly with zero difference.
It's the same shite with Comey. Firing the freaking MANAGER of an investigation doesn't stop/end/change/alter anything.
AND, knowing now that there was no conspiracy (collusion), Trump obviously knew he was innocent. So why the frick would he obstruct something he knew would result in no incriminating evidence found?
How is it remotely plausible to try to prevent someone from finding something that you knew didn't exist?
It isn't. Nobody is going to do that.
At worst, Trump was worried Mueller and Weissman would fabricate evidence and manufacture a crime. Which is essentially what has happened here. AND, there actually was an obnoxiously clear conflict of interest for Mueller and his entire Leftwing witch-hunting crew to even be on this case.
Anyone who is unwilling to admit that Mueller is absurdly biased against Trump, especially after that press conference where he buttfricked the concept of "Innocent until proven guilty", clearly to gift the Dems with a massive boon for their impeachment crusade, is as dishonest as the day is long.
And his testimony to the Nadler HIC is only going to do it again. That's it's entire purpose and everyone who isn't a dishonest piece of shite knows it.
This post was edited on 7/9/19 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 12/12/19 at 12:16 pm to tigerinDC09
This aged very poorly
The IG report outright states Steele lied about what his sources said
The IG report outright states Steele lied about what his sources said
This post was edited on 12/12/19 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 12/12/19 at 12:19 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
HailHailtoMichigan!
Nice find
Posted on 12/12/19 at 12:20 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
TigerinDC:
Holy shite
quote:
They used it for a Carter Page FISA. The part they used has been largely verified.
Holy shite
Posted on 12/12/19 at 12:20 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This is a bump of superior quality.
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News