- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Holy shite, y'all.Someone actually cares about my bitching about the NO Clerk of Court saga
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:10 pm to jimmy the leg
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:10 pm to jimmy the leg
quote:
She has refused to address my post from page 2:
Did you read the letter? And you still have these questions? Or do you want a special individual response from me with the same information in the letter?
1
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:14 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
Did you tell him about fricking a homeless guy and your loss of two wheeled transport?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:15 pm to bgtiger
quote:
Five pages of these idiots giving you the attention you want. Well done!
What’s humorous about these posters that others allegedly can’t stand is that the ones who get driven up a wall don’t HAVE to respond….but they just can’t help themselves.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:21 pm to KCT
quote:
She comes here and takes a dump on 70% of this board on a regular basis,
Dude. This thread is mostly people taking a dump on me. How far back in my post history will you have go to find evidence of me taking a dump on the board? Stop being such a hypocrite. Basically all of your posts to me are overt, explicit insults and now you're whining because you claim I dump on the board?
It's also strange that you're posting multiple posts of insults to me that I haven't responded to while also diagnosing me as a fragile narcissist. Where am I?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:27 pm to 4cubbies
I wrote a letter espousing principles the majority of this board claims to celebrate and stand for. The responses are largely: You had sex with a homeless person. Someone stole your bike 15 years ago. You are stupid. You said something I didn't like in a different thread days or weeks or months or years ago. You just want attention.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:32 pm to Bard
quote:
The only way you could change it back is if the state were to get a Democrat majority in the legislature AND a Democrat governor to pass a bill re-enabling the split office and then signing it into law, but I don't see that happening any time soon.
So... never?
Do you think the issue of the State invalidating the outcome of a local election will be addressed? I guess there's no way to force that.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 12:33 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Continuously? That’s a bit of a stretch.
It's actually not. Every post could start with "Guess what I did!!" or "Look at what happened to me!!"
quote:
I don’t view this as patting myself on the back as much as showing regular citizens that there are avenues to amplify your voices.
If any "regular citizens" are unaware of any means to voice your concerns to public officials and/or representatives.. they are too stupid to vote.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 1:00 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
So... never?
Never is a long time, but with their growing adoption of the Socialist movement nationally I don't see the Democrat Party holding sway in the state for at least the rest of my natural lifetime.
quote:
Do you think the issue of the State invalidating the outcome of a local election will be addressed?
No because that's not the primary issue, only a corollary. The primary legal issue here was "does the legislature, along with the Office of the Governor, have the constitutional authority to terminate this position" and the answer was "yes". It didn't matter to the courts whether the position was an elected one or not, only the mechanics of the legality of its existence. There are other positions in the state which similarly are subject to such a change. One big example was the merging of the Orleans, East Jefferson, and Lake Borgne Basin levee boards in the wake of Katrina, this forced the removal of elected seats as the boards merged but was absolutely within the legislature's and governor's authority.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 2:24 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
You said something I didn't like in a different thread
No. You said a police officer shot and killed Trayvon martin.
You stated that Sandra bland was killed by jail employees and did not commit suicide.
These are patently and easily verifiable lies that you simply REFUSE to correct.
Who killed Trayvon martin. Who killed Sandra bland.
These are slam dunk easy questions you should be able to answer yet have refused for a year
Posted on 6/29/26 at 2:28 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Let me see if I understand. You wouldn’t have been upset if Congress eliminated the position of POTUS after Trump was elected since voters didn’t vote for the creation of the office of POTUS?
If Congress had created the position of President (it didn't) then it would have the right to abolish that position.
Do you dispute that the Louisiana Legislature created the position of Criminal Clerk? Do you dispute that they have the legal authority to elimate that position?
After following your rants on this topic I gather your problem is that the legislature abolished this position after an election was held for the position. Under your logic, could this office ever be abolished?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 2:46 pm to moneyg
It might help if you know the pov I'm coming from; I'm for secession, big time. I'm talking down to the city level. If what you said about NO and Cubbies position is true, then the rest of the state should want to kick NO out as well. It's two sides of the same coin.
I know my views won't come true, but I think it's beneficial when anyone, regardless of politics, advocates for some kind of secession. On X, when Trump won and all kinds of Lefties wanted to secede, I agreed w/ every one of them, even though I'm so far to the right that I make Milton Friedman look like Karl Marx.
I know my views won't come true, but I think it's beneficial when anyone, regardless of politics, advocates for some kind of secession. On X, when Trump won and all kinds of Lefties wanted to secede, I agreed w/ every one of them, even though I'm so far to the right that I make Milton Friedman look like Karl Marx.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 3:11 pm to Bard
quote:
No because that's not the primary issue, only a corollary.
Wouldn't that depend on who you ask?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 3:17 pm to Red Stick Rambler
quote:
Under your logic, could this office ever be abolished?
This assumes OP uses logic.
It's all about the FEELS, man.
Her thread about property rights and how society wouldn't honor HER wishes upon her demise ... pretty much sealed the fact that OP doesn't know sylogism exists ...
Posted on 6/29/26 at 3:22 pm to Red Stick Rambler
quote:It was created in 1879 when 134 delegates gathered in New Orleans and wrote a new state constitution.
Do you dispute that the Louisiana Legislature created the position of Criminal Clerk?
quote:I've state numerous times that the legislature has the technical authority to do this.
Do you dispute that they have the legal authority to climate that position?
quote:
After following your rants on this topic I gather your problem is that the legislature abolished this position after an election was held for the position.
I've explicitly stated this countless times across many threads.
quote:At the conclusion of the impacted term.
Under your logic, could this office ever be abolished?
The "Because they said so" defense is insulting. Ignoring all the context and challenges to democratic governance does not strengthen your argument.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 6/29/26 at 3:25 pm to AmishSamurai
quote:
Her thread about property rights and how society wouldn't honor HER wishes upon her demise
You know we can link that thread and show that this is completely made up, right?
I guess your reality is based on your FEELS, man.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 3:25 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Did you read the letter?
Yes
quote:
And you still have these questions?
Yes
Posted on 6/29/26 at 3:29 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I am questioning why the State facilitated an election
Wasn’t it requested by New Orleans, even though they were told that the position was going to be consolidated?
Once requested…
quote:
the State facilitated an election, certified the election results,
Then the legislature followed through with their stated intention.
While you refuse to answer legitimate questions, I gave you a plausible (probable) course of action.
It seems like New Orleans wasted money (again).
I do love your consistency in knighting for known criminals.
I am questioning why the State facilitated an election
Wasn’t it requested by New Orleans, even though they were told that the position was going to be consolidated?
Once requested…
quote:
the State facilitated an election, certified the election results,
Then the legislature followed through with their stated intention.
While you refuse to answer legitimate questions, I gave you a plausible (probable) course of action.
It seems like New Orleans wasted money (again).
I do love your consistency in knighting for known criminals.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 3:33 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Wouldn't that depend on who you ask?
The only opinion that matters in this is that of the court and that's essentially what they said.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 3:35 pm to 4cubbies
Posted on 6/29/26 at 4:24 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
It was created in 1879 when 134 delegates gathered in New Orleans and wrote a new state constitution.
And what does the current constitution - adopted over 50 years ago - say about the Orleans Criminal Clerk?
quote:
I've state numerous times that the legislature has the technical authority to do this.
quote:
The "Because they said so" defense is insulting. Ignoring all the context and challenges to democratic governance does not strengthen your argument.
Because they said so? By "they" do you mean the duly elected legislative branch? And "said so" means what - that the legislature passed a law that that they "technically" had the authority pass but you disagree with it? Isn't that the nature of democratic governance (even though we're a republic, not a democracy)?
Do you have any basis for your statement that the legislature can only abolish on office "at the conclusion of the impacted term?"
One last but serious question (and this is what baffles me about your argument): do you believe that Orleans parish should not be subject to laws enacted by the Louisiana legislature when they're not approved of by a majority of New Orleanians?
Page 6 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News