- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/30/19 at 8:02 am to bmy
quote:
Still on the muh 2nd hand information melt?
That would be you and your leftist friends.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 8:06 am to bmy
quote:
We are looking at a rule change and not a change to the law
Answer this and I'll listen: Please explain to all of us on this board how the federal government, in this instance, can "change" rules in place?
Does there not have to be a committee?
Does there not have to be a vote?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 8:12 am to jimdog
quote:We've made that supposition here.
Hits are coming fast. Appears the dems "updated" the WB statute to fit the complaint
Is there any actual evidence beyond conjecture though?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 8:14 am to wmr
quote:
History has shown there's only one way to deal with Commies....
Posted on 9/30/19 at 8:22 am to jimdog
quote:Here is a detailed article about the process surrounding the changes to the form in question.
“It seems like they are jumping to a lot of conclusions based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the law, the regulatory framework, and the language on one form,” said Julian Sanchez, a senior fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute.
quote:
“There’s never been a requirement that a whistleblower have firsthand knowledge of what they’re reporting,” said Irvin McCullough, an investigator at the nonprofit Government Accountability Project (and the son of a former IC IG). “They need to have a reasonable belief. The firsthand information is usually gathered by the inspector general, as I believe did occur here.”
This post was edited on 9/30/19 at 8:27 am
Posted on 9/30/19 at 9:30 am to AggieHank86
So, it is imperative that the wb give up the name of the person with the firsthand knowledge...
This should be interesting
This should be interesting
Posted on 9/30/19 at 9:32 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
Seems certain that the Dems violated federal procedures in rushing through the "hearsay" provision without proper notice and time-period for public comment.
I call it "New Law" -- whatever serves the ends of the Resist Revolution is Legal.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 9:50 am to bmy
quote:
There is nothing unethical about changing a rule (or form) to be consistent with statute.
Like I said. You know why they did this and, you simply don't care.
Which is why you and everyone like you are pure scum
Posted on 9/30/19 at 10:16 am to jimdog
What is great is the lunatic fringe from the left think they have Trump, while the Obama group is trying to shut them up, because some many walls will come crashing down during an impeachment hearing.
Trump just struck the match, and is watching the party burn itself down.
Trump just struck the match, and is watching the party burn itself down.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 10:25 am to Champagne
I call it "New Law" -- whatever serves the ends of the Resist Revolution is Legal.
I call it the handy work of Lawfare.
I call it the handy work of Lawfare.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:36 pm to NC_Tigah
Yes. This is all entertaining for the mob like house dems but the adults and loyal American citizens in the senate will slap them down.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News