- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hits are coming fast. Appears the dems "updated" the WB statute to fit the complaint
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:44 am
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:44 am
they pretty obviously authored. And Biden is trying to silence any discussion of his foreign dealings as VP. Mercy. Could we just roll back the clock to say 20 years or so to when our scandals were cigars and interns while the president's receptionist made sure they had "privacy". At least we understood that: old guys and young women. And it didn't involve Billions of dollars.
11
Posted on 9/30/19 at 12:49 am to jimdog
It's the Ukraine.
They know they are exposed.
They know they are exposed.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:04 am to jimdog
Imagine if we had a neutral, honest media....
History has shown there's only one way to deal with Commies....
History has shown there's only one way to deal with Commies....
Posted on 9/30/19 at 1:17 am to wmr
quote:
History has shown there's only one way to deal with Commies.
Helicopter rides.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 6:14 am to jimdog
Seems certain that the Dems violated federal procedures in rushing through the "hearsay" provision without proper notice and time-period for public comment.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 6:38 am to jimdog
What does the law require?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 6:51 am to bmy
quote:
What does the law require?
Appears bad actors will change the “law” depending on impact to omb.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 6:55 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Appears bad actors will change the “law” depending on impact to omb.
We are looking at a rule change and not a change to the law
This post was edited on 9/30/19 at 7:21 am
Posted on 9/30/19 at 6:57 am to bmy
quote:
We are looking at a rule changea and not a change to the law
Why I put “law” in quotes, why do you think the rule was changed simultaneously with this fake whistleblower report?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:07 am to jimdog
Wrong! There were bigger scandals during the Clinton administration. There was no Trump to expose them. What has been bigger than Clinton giving the Chinese the latest High Speed Computer technology.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:09 am to jimdog
Marxist - Socialist embedded everywhere in this government. Especially disturbing to me is the involvement of this so-called "whistleblower" from an intelligence agency. The Deep State tried to oust Trump using resources (and manpower) out of the DOJ and the FBI but that failed, so now they've upped the ante. The Deep State is pulling in the intelligence resources to get Trump. A lot at stake here..........these folks will do ANYTHING to preserve their power.
Really disturbing stuff what these folks are attempting.
Really disturbing stuff what these folks are attempting.
This post was edited on 9/30/19 at 7:15 am
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:31 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Why I put “law” in quotes, why do you think the rule was changed simultaneously with this fake whistleblower report?
It appears the changes were in motion as early as May btw. And the previous form which required first hand experience was brand new being approved in May, 2018.
Based on my minor experience in rulemaking.. I suspect an official learned that the form was not consistent with statute, pointed that out, and revisions were made.
This post was edited on 9/30/19 at 7:41 am
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:34 am to bmy
quote:
appears the changes were in motion as early as May btw. And the previous form which required first hand experience was brand new being approved in May, 2018
You didn’t answer the question.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:35 am to bmy
quote:Very little .... other than salacious hearsay.
What does the law require?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:36 am to jimdog
quote:
Appears the dems "updated" the WB statute to fit the complaint
Convenient huh?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:37 am to jimdog
Where you seeing that it appears they updated it?
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:39 am to bmy
quote:good God. This is why we all know you are pure scum. You know what they did is unethical but you don't care at all
What does the law require
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:43 am to ShortyRob
quote:
good God. This is why we all know you are pure scum. You know what they did is unethical but you don't care at all
There is nothing unethical about changing a rule (or form) to be consistent with statute.
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:47 am to bmy
quote:
There is nothing unethical about changing a rule (or form) to be consistent with statute.
Says the child porn producer
Posted on 9/30/19 at 7:53 am to MrLarson
quote:
Says the child porn producer
Still on the muh 2nd hand information melt?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News