- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/30/26 at 9:55 am to RFK
That whole area doesn’t understand diplomacy. Turn it all to glass and start building dollar generals. If it is going to be a perpetual crap hole at least make it crap holes we are accustomed to. Import some Shakeishas, Ladarrius, and catalytic converters meth heads over there and let’s roll.
This post was edited on 5/30/26 at 9:56 am
Posted on 5/30/26 at 9:56 am to Trevaylin
quote:
If Iran does not get to pop off a nuclear bomb in the next 20 year's the war was a success. If Iran does not drop ballistic missiles on Europe for the next 20 years the war was a success. If funding of Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, etc results in them being limited in their evil activity for the next 20 year's the war is a success. Its stupid to declare failure three months into this global correction of bad behavior
You’re right. It’s impossible to know what will happen in the future. All we have to go off of is history. History tells us one of these things will happen. Here’s to hoping maybe this time it will be different.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 12:32 pm to Bunk Moreland
He seems to be something.
I usually fall in the same camp, but realize sometimes exceptions need to be made, and feel like Iran is one of those exceptions.
Who can be on board giving or allowing those inbred twelvers the to have the ultimate weapon of destruction?
Or the ability to terrorize the entire region?
How many attacks on our ships, bases, and personnel is permissable?
Apparently ALL ARE according to some on the board, and that's baffling to me.
I usually fall in the same camp, but realize sometimes exceptions need to be made, and feel like Iran is one of those exceptions.
Who can be on board giving or allowing those inbred twelvers the to have the ultimate weapon of destruction?
Or the ability to terrorize the entire region?
How many attacks on our ships, bases, and personnel is permissable?
Apparently ALL ARE according to some on the board, and that's baffling to me.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 12:42 pm to RFK
quote:
Unless you’re delusional or disingenuous, you cannot claim any benefit from this needless war.
Iran doesn't have a nuclear bomb.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 1:06 pm to RFK
The quickest way to end a war is lose - Dave Mustain (Megadeth “Dystopia”)
This post was edited on 5/30/26 at 3:20 pm
Posted on 5/30/26 at 1:08 pm to AC1221
quote:
So your solution would have been to allow Iran to purchase the supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles from China (violating the UN weapons embargo) and allowed them to keep pursuing the development of nukes?
Why don't we just give them anti-ship missiles and a couple of our ICBM's and call it good?
That would be your preferred choice, right? To do easy thing?
Strong men make the hard decisions, and you, sir, do not seem like a strong man.
Okay genius, let me ask you a couple of questions. Was Operation Midnight Hammer a success or not?
How many regimes have fallen, throughout history, strictly from air campaigns? Oh, that number is zero? Interesting.
So, since you're a grade-A alpha who's all about making the hard decisions (my God, I can't read your last line without laughing, you're such a cringe poser), I take it you fully support a ground invasion? I mean, you have to, or do you think we should just negotiate with the IRGC and let them remain in power indefinitely? (I can sling retarded, rhetorical slop questions too)
If we're going to make the "hard" decision here then we should have had the Marine Corps ready to go in following the initial series of strikes, which is probably what's going to end up happening anyway. You don't get rid of regimes by bombing them and, regardless of how many Supreme Leaders get schwacked by a JDAM or a Reaper, here's a little secret about Islamic death cults based on martyrdom, you can't really bomb them into submission. We saw this in Iraq and Afghanistan.
But I guess you, Mr. Ubermensch, will be fine with starting yet another ground war in the Middle East, is that right? Well, I fully expect you, or your son depending on your age, to be first in line at the recruiter's office so you can further enlighten the military on the necessity for hard decisions and strong men and...damn, your retarded bullshite really does go BRRRRRT, huh?
You're not only a weak man, which is bad enough, but your the worst kind...one who thinks he is strong. Oh, and you're stupid too. Man, you really hit the genetic lottery, huh?
Posted on 5/30/26 at 1:41 pm to RFK
quote:
I don’t understand the downvotes. Unless you’re delusional or disingenuous, you cannot claim any benefit from this needless war.
A cult can never oppose the cult leader. Trump is considered infallible in their eyes. If something goes right—-he's a genius. If something goes wrong—-it's someone else's fault or you just don't understand that it was the plan all along.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 1:51 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Iran doesn't have a nuclear bomb.
They don't even have the materials for a nuclear bomb. Uhh, or do they?? Why would they want this stuff? Centrifuges, uranium hexafluoride. Why?
Posted on 5/30/26 at 2:17 pm to RFK
Trump botched Iran because he can’t shut the F&ck up.
His bridge and power plant day threat was horribly dumb, he was never going to do it.
His bridge and power plant day threat was horribly dumb, he was never going to do it.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 2:52 pm to Tom288
Wow. Somebody likes to pontificate.
And with the ad hominems, too?
Sounds like somebody's off their mood stabilizers.
A lot of leaps in logic amidst your blathering, but I will respond with this:
I never claimed to be strong, nor do I know what the solution to this issue is.
If the Houthis blew up a USN ship with supersonic missiles or if Iran obtained a nuke and smoked a neighboring country, what would you suggest we do (after you blamed Trump for not preventing it)?
Why don't you pull up your programming socks and go back to DU?
And with the ad hominems, too?
Sounds like somebody's off their mood stabilizers.
A lot of leaps in logic amidst your blathering, but I will respond with this:
I never claimed to be strong, nor do I know what the solution to this issue is.
If the Houthis blew up a USN ship with supersonic missiles or if Iran obtained a nuke and smoked a neighboring country, what would you suggest we do (after you blamed Trump for not preventing it)?
Why don't you pull up your programming socks and go back to DU?
Posted on 5/30/26 at 3:12 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
There’s only one point of failure:
Starting the war.
IMO the failure is not finishing it.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 7:30 pm to Bison
quote:
My guess is His advisors thought this would be another Venezuela , perhaps presented by Israel that way:
Totally different situations. The Venezuela mission was to specifically extract a single person.
Posted on 5/30/26 at 9:38 pm to AC1221
Netanyahu said 30 fricking years ago that they were two weeks away. Come on man.
Posted on 5/31/26 at 1:47 am to grizzlylongcut
Did I not address that?
Did I not say info from the IAEA was what I believed?
Is the IAEA Bibi's puppet, too?
Did I not say info from the IAEA was what I believed?
Is the IAEA Bibi's puppet, too?
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News