- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:44 pm to Speckhunter2012
quote:
Interesting and does not make me question my faith in Christianity.
I've long since became an inclusive believer in Christianity and have adopted theosophy in addition to Christianity. I see Christianity as just one of many possible paths and in some respects inferior to other religious beliefs. There is a difference, imo, in true religion, and what any one single dogma preaches. They all touch on aspects of the same underlying story, imo.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:45 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Here is a video just released
Did you watch the video you just linked. I mean. Holy shite
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:46 pm to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Did you watch the video you just linked. I mean. Holy shite
Did you not read my entire post? As I said, he seems to think the object is a balloon, but that is obvious bullshite.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:47 pm to AlterEd
quote:
. A balloon is not going to be flying along the ground like that and visible from a drone flying thousands of feet in the air.
The balloon is not flying along the ground. That is an illusion. That’s the whole point. Also black is hot in that video.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:50 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Did you not read my entire post?
I admit I didn’t. It’s not obvious bullshite though. It’s a phenomenon that can be easily replicated with common objects. Therefore, you better produce some much more convincing evidence.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 9:57 pm to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
That is an illusion
So he says, but there is no location, altitude, wind data, or full sensory telemetry for this clip. The video is low resolution, zoomed-in thermal footage with sensor noise, manual tracking and no clear scale or speed reference.
Without these things clear attribution is nearly impossible and while many videos like this do end up being more mundane objects (balloons, birds, etc) the people responsible for identifying this particular one label it as unresolved.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:06 pm to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Therefore, you better produce some much more convincing evidence.
Well, hopefully that is coming. But while we wait, we still have many lawmakers who have had access to the files say what we are dealing with and an apparent operation to kill or disappear people who work in these sensitive programs that would be privy to this information. The count is up to 12 now, by the way.
Something is obviously going on and we have many people either currently in government or formerly in government telling us what it is.
As I said, disclosure has happened already whether you accept it or not.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:09 pm to AlterEd
quote:
The video is low resolution, zoomed-in thermal footage with sensor noise, manual tracking and no clear scale or speed reference.
quote:
Without these things clear attribution is nearly impossible and while many videos like this do end up being more mundane objects (balloons, birds, etc) the people responsible for identifying this particular one label it as unresolved.
I mean that’s exactly my point. The phenomenon is and always has been mundane objects on the edge of whatever sensor’s detectability.
If it can be explained by something simple…it’s probably something simple.
I truly hope I’m wrong, but in the absence of actual evidence the only defensible position is disbelief.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:10 pm to AlterEd
quote:
we still have many lawmakers
The most trustworthy people on the planet
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:15 pm to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
The most trustworthy people on the planet
They're the ones who are going to be bringing you this evidence you demand either way. If you take the position that people like Tim Burchett are being dishonest in what he says here, you'll still believe he's being dishonest even when better evidence comes. Instead of saying it's balloons you'll just shift to saying it's AI generated or something else.
To me, Burchett seems to be about the most honest and straight shooting person in DC.
This post was edited on 5/15/26 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:28 pm to AlterEd
quote:
They're the ones who are going to be bringing you this evidence you demand either way.
The evidence I demand can be brought forward by anyone. You are the one relying on people who have said they’ve “seen” things.
That’s not evidence. If there is non-human intelligence visiting earth prove it. If it’s so obvious, why is there no hard proof?
quote:
Instead of saying it's balloons you'll just shift to saying it's AI generated or something else.
Maybe I’m naive, but really don’t think they’ll resort to trying to fake it. I think they’re allowed to be wrong, but I certainly wouldn’t default to “it’s AI”.
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:37 pm to StrongOffer
quote:
against the laws of nature.
When the laws of nature are broken are new laws of nature written?
Posted on 5/15/26 at 10:37 pm to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
You are the one relying on people who have said they’ve “seen” things.
But at least THREE people have said it. Maybe FOUR.
quote:
That’s not evidence.
It is on this board.
quote:
If there is non-human intelligence visiting earth prove it. If it’s so obvious, why is there no hard proof?
Just wait. It's coming...any day now...any day.
Posted on 5/16/26 at 2:11 am to AlterEd
Definitely not a balloon.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News