- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Here's the SCUM that Perry is being indicted over (SIAP) .......
Posted on 8/17/14 at 1:38 pm to asurob1
Posted on 8/17/14 at 1:38 pm to asurob1
quote:I assume you are aware of Lehmberg's behavior while in custody?
So again, anyone who doesn't agree with your crazy views.
scum.
Are you saying Lehmberg, who shockingly still runs the state's Public Integrity Unit, and refused to resign from her position, is not "scum"?
0
Posted on 8/17/14 at 1:42 pm to asurob1
quote:
Will remember that use in the future.
Please do.
LC
This is posted in the other thread, this is what you are defending.
Nutbag threatens cops
This post was edited on 8/17/14 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 8/17/14 at 1:54 pm to Rex
quote:
Link to the law the Grand Jury says he violated? He very well might be prohibited by law from vetoing things as political retribution.
Really? So any time a grand jury subjectively decides a veto was 'political retribution,' they can just start handing out indictments? Great precedent to set. let's just start indicting every single governor in the country while we're at it. Oh, and the President, too. Why stop there? What's the statute of limitations on this abhorrent political act? Can we indict every living former President for their politically-minded vetoes?
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:00 pm to LongueCarabine
quote:
This is posted in the other thread, this is what you are defending.
Not defending anyone.
Am however, enjoy watching the Perry empire burn.
He is a moron. And much like every other moron the republicans run out there, I hope, nay, pray he runs for president again.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:08 pm to REG861
quote:
So any time a grand jury subjectively decides a veto was 'political retribution,' they can just start handing out indictments?
ANY time? No. But in this case in Texas? Maybe. What does the law say?
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:08 pm to asurob1
quote:
Not defending anyone.
quote:Your recharacterization of Lehmberg as someone "who doesn't agree with" the OP's "crazy views" is a defense.
So again, anyone who doesn't agree with your crazy views.
scum.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:09 pm to asurob1
quote:
And much like every other moron the republicans run out there, I hope, nay, pray he runs for president again.
Why? Aren't you claiming t" be "independent?:
This post was edited on 8/17/14 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:13 pm to Rex
quote:
ANY time? No. But in this case in Texas? Maybe. What does the law say?
To my knowledge, that it's squarely within the Governor's power to veto.
I haven't seen any Democrats link me to the provision where a veto is illegal because it has a political basis. Other than to scream, 'abuse of power!,' that is.
This post was edited on 8/17/14 at 2:15 pm
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:16 pm to NC_Tigah
Honestly the Perry issue in all of this seems more of a revenge ploy. What is more troubling to me is that this woman feels compelled to ride it out, and not give up her position. I've known people fired from jobs not pertaining to public office for a DWI. to me that is pretty troubling.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:18 pm to biohzrd
quote:
Honestly the Perry issue in all of this seems more of a revenge ploy. What is more troubling to me is that this woman feels compelled to ride it out, and not give up her position. I've known people fired from jobs not pertaining to public office for a DWI. to me that is pretty troubling.
You would think this is the obvious conclusion everyone would come to, but then hack partisan politics trumps common sense more often than not, apparently.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:20 pm to asurob1
quote:
Am however, enjoy watching the Perry empire burn.
Yawn. I don't live in TX so this doesn't affect me in the least.
And Rick Perry will likely never be President anyway, because the liberal press would have smeared him for a number of reasons.
But it's nice to know that you think different standards should be applied based on party affiliation.
LC
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
And much like every other moron the republicans run out there, I hope, nay, pray he runs for president again.
Why? Aren't you claiming t" be "independent?:
Because this board will go into explosive meltdown, when the republicans fail once again to win the presidency at a time when the democratic part is at it's absolute weakest.
That will be a a glorious day indeed.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:39 pm to asurob1
quote:
Because this board will go into explosive meltdown, when the republicans fail once again to win the presidency at a time when the democratic part is at it's absolute weakest.
That will be a a glorious day indeed.
so childish.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:42 pm to asurob1
I guess if you get your pleasure from seeing a board if message posters you don't know acting angry, then it would be fun.
On the issue at hand, I don't even like Perry and this indictment is patently absurd.
On the issue at hand, I don't even like Perry and this indictment is patently absurd.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 2:49 pm to asurob1
quote:Why is the Democrat Party weak?
when the republicans fail once again to win the presidency at a time when the democratic part is at it's absolute weakest.
That will be a a glorious day indeed.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 3:02 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Why is the Democrat Party weak?
Because it is in power, mostly.
When Democrats are in power, they get to implement their policies.
When they implement their policies, things go to shite because their policies don't work.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 3:24 pm to asurob1
quote:
Because this board will go into explosive meltdown, when the republicans fail once again to win the presidency at a time when the democratic part is at it's absolute weakest.
That will be a a glorious day indeed.
If anyone wants to know why the nation is fricked politically, the quoted material is why. "Us vs Them." The desire to see a political outcome only to offend the opposite side.
Congrats for being a huge part of the problem.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 3:27 pm to biohzrd
Accepting state funds to operate a Public Integrity Unit with the purpose of investigating all state office holders means you are subject to scrutiny and questioning and maybe even oversight from the state...for that program line. That the Travis County DA has continued to think it can accept state funds for a state-wide program but is only answerable to the commies in Travis County is laughable. The Gov has a responsibility to ensure state programs funded under his authority are operated and led in an appropriate manner. If Perry had done this to someone else holding a significant state govt position in Austin, we wouldn't be hearing about it.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 3:29 pm to MMauler
Does Rick Perry have to actually turn himself in to booking and take a mugshot?
What a phony trumped up charge this is.
What a phony trumped up charge this is.
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News