- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Handwriting Analysis Can’t Exonerate Roy Moore
Posted on 11/17/17 at 2:51 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
Posted on 11/17/17 at 2:51 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
Could you recall ever person you ever came into contact with over the last 40 years?
I can't remember everyone I came into contact with yesterday
1
Posted on 11/17/17 at 2:54 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
I can't remember everyone I came into contact with yesterday
Heck, I can go into the grocery for my wife to get milk and forget to get milk.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 4:34 pm to MrLarson
quote:
The FBI says you are an idiot.
They also said hair analysis was a lock.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 5:35 pm to SSpaniel
quote:frick Mitt Romney. He tried to kill his dog, and succeeded in killing an employee's wife.
Tell that to Mitt Romney.
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 11/17/17 at 5:51 pm to CommoDawg
quote:Hardly.
It certainly disproves Moore's claim that he never met the woman
In fact, Gloria Allred admitted as much when she stated she hadn't asked her "client" if she witnessed Moore signing the thing.
Further, if the ink in the sig does not match ink in the message, the accusation is substantiated as one big lie. Right?
What would disprove the claim is Corfman accurately describing details of the inside of Moore's home. Has she done that? Has she been asked to? If not, that is very odd.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 5:51 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:That's what Moore's lawyer said, but the divorce lawyer said it was a motion to dismiss since they didn't go through with the divorce at that time. There was no hearing, and we all know that Moore's secretary stamped his signature on the motion.
He did meet the woman. She came before him in his courtroom. Could you recall ever person you ever came into contact with over the last 40 years?
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 11/17/17 at 5:53 pm to mmcgrath
Hmmm. You can't file a motion to dismiss and still have the divorce go through. You need to get your story straight McRape.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 5:57 pm to BBONDS25
She wouldn't say She saw him sign it. Case closed. She is trying to avoid being sued or jail.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:00 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
and we all know that Moore's secretary stamped his signature on the motion.
Which is where the forgery came from. Thank you for proving that point you damn idiot.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:01 pm to BBONDS25
quote:The divorce didn't go through that time. She refiled for divorce 5 years later.
Hmmm. You can't file a motion to dismiss and still have the divorce go through. You need to get your story straight McRape.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:10 pm to MrLarson
quote:Sure. Except there are huge differences including the "DA".
Which is where the forgery came from. Thank you for proving that point you damn idiot.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:12 pm to mmcgrath
That clears it up. Thanks.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:14 pm to BBONDS25
quote:No problem. Facts are slow to come out in these things.
That clears it up. Thanks.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:20 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
What I don't get is that you Dems expect Moore to prove a negative.
Clinton was guilty as hell, but you could say the same thing about him. There is no physical evidence that he raped Broadrick. I believe he did because I believe she is more credible. I don't know if Moore assaulted the girl, but IMO Moore's tacit admission that he chased 16-18 year olds while in his early 30s doesn't help his credibility.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:25 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:I believe he did too but I damned sure wouldn't say he should have resigned based solely on her say so.
There is no physical evidence that he raped Broadrick. I believe he did because I believe she is more credible.
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:32 pm to ShortyRob
Same here. He lied under oath as a sitting potus and the left looked away.
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 6:33 pm
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:39 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
There is no physical evidence that he raped Broadrick. I believe he did because I believe she is more credible.
I believe he did too but I damned sure wouldn't say he should have resigned based solely on her say so.
I agree.
He should have resigned when he got caught lying about Lewinsky.
As far as Moore is concerned, no, he shouldn't step down just in the basis of her accusation. Stepping down if it becomes apparent that he's going to lose is a different story.
This post was edited on 11/17/17 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:43 pm to CommoDawg
quote:
Handwriting Analysis Can't Exonerate
So assuming Judge Moore DID sign that student's yearbook, what crime did he commit that required exoneration?
Posted on 11/17/17 at 6:46 pm to BamaGradinTn
quote:False!
There is no physical evidence that he raped Broadrick.
Nonetheless, the pertinent issue in 2016 was Hillary's horrid actions targeting Bill's accusers
Posted on 11/17/17 at 7:04 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
There is no physical evidence that he raped Broadrick.
False!
Ok, Jack McCoy, what was the physical evidence?
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News