- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hamas Savagery vs. American Savagery
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:11 am to BarberitosDawg
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:11 am to BarberitosDawg
quote:
53 postings in 5 years and your coming in hotter than a kamikaze?
Alter for sure…
aw hell - I wasted valuable minutes responding to that piece of shite.
I gotta start paying closer attention to the poster. I can usually spot the bad ones just by their style.
I enlarge my screen so the left hand column is off screen.
0
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:17 am to PQuin
A lot of our foreign policy has been ethically dubious for some time now, so don't take this as a blanket defense of it.
But if you want to question the US commitment to reduce collateral damage, consider the Ginsu version of the Hellfire. We dramatically decrease our odds of success by removing the explosive and essentially limiting damage to a ~5 radius. We've got to land it on them, not near them, but it's a trade-off we've chosen to make.
But if you want to question the US commitment to reduce collateral damage, consider the Ginsu version of the Hellfire. We dramatically decrease our odds of success by removing the explosive and essentially limiting damage to a ~5 radius. We've got to land it on them, not near them, but it's a trade-off we've chosen to make.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:28 am to PQuin
How
Many abortion per year? Now that’s savage
Many abortion per year? Now that’s savage
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:33 am to PQuin
Hamas worships a pedophile. They can all die and the world will be a better place.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:37 am to LARancher1991
quote:
The OP's question was not about a single particular terrorist. But now that you brought it up let me ask this. How many lives is it worth to wait until a terrorist can be taken out without causing collateral damage? Let's say we know he is about to plan an attack that could possibly kill 100 people. He will plan this attack from an apartment building. Do you let him plan the attack and possibly kill 100 people in order to avoid collateral damage? At what point does he or others get wise and realize they are safe as long as they are around civilians?
All good questions. All the more reason for the USA to retire from the anti-terrorism business except as to protect the United States.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:38 am to PQuin
Dang, I saw the title and thought it would be about Hamas savagery vs. Comanche or Apache savagery.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:39 am to IvoryBillMatt
Hamas Savagery vs. American Savagery
While you are at it you might as well defend Satan also.
While you are at it you might as well defend Satan also.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:40 am to PQuin
Europe Board
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:53 am to Goforit
I take SERIOUS offense at that.
I am NOT defending Hamas, and would fight against anything Satanic.
I am NOT defending Hamas, and would fight against anything Satanic.
This post was edited on 4/9/25 at 11:04 am
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:55 am to BarberitosDawg
quote:its more like a cicadas. They pop up after several years out of nowhere
Alter for sure…
Posted on 4/9/25 at 10:55 am to PQuin
quote:
While this is obviously true in many cases, I'm curious to hear why leveling an apartment building to kill one person is any better than the actions of Hamas or any other group. It was pretty wild to see the group chat sending fist-bump emojis after killing around 50 people, with most of the casualties being women and children.
100% agree. Hard to take anyone seriously who doesn’t even think it’s worth debate.
If your analysis only goes to “it’s right because we do it”, then you’re like the scarecrow.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 11:10 am to IvoryBillMatt
Guess that depends on how to interpret what protecting the US is. The houthis for example. Are attacks on international shipping harmful to the United States? You can make a pretty solid argument that it is based on the economic impacts it could potentially have. Also if the US does retire from the anti-terrorism business at what point do we get back involved? After a direct attack or when there is a possibility of a direct attack? Bottom line is retiring from anti-terrorism operations isn't an option. We are the only country that has the force projection capabilities to combat terrorism at its point of origin.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 11:11 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:You tell us. What was your answer for the 2 big ones Japan got?
In killing terrorists, what's an acceptable ratio for terrorist to children killed? Is it acceptable to kill 2 children per terrorist? 10 children per terrorist?
Posted on 4/9/25 at 11:48 am to PQuin
Most of you can easily see the leftist lunatics being blinded by anti-Trump propaganda, but still believe that the terrorists in the Middle East “hate us for our freedom”. You refuse to acknowledge that we have been subjected to many years of pro-Israel propaganda because it makes you uncomfortable in your 60+ Sunday school class.
How would you feel watching your own family get blown to pieces right in front of you? If your answer is anything but “shut the frick up and take it”, then you should be able to relate to their situation.
How would you feel watching your own family get blown to pieces right in front of you? If your answer is anything but “shut the frick up and take it”, then you should be able to relate to their situation.
This post was edited on 4/9/25 at 11:52 am
Posted on 4/9/25 at 11:56 am to PQuin
I think it works out like this from for example Afghanistan. Marines get in fire fight where they get caught in well set up ambush. Call in airstrike to knock out the heavy machine gun fire coming from two buildings. Both buildings become instant rubble and firefight over. All marines saved. I like those odds.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 11:59 am to LARancher1991
quote:
Guess that depends on how to interpret what protecting the US is.
I agree, and it's not any easy question. When using military assets, however, I think at a minimum there has to be consultation with Congress before hand. It was refreshing to see Democrat members of Congress call out the Biden Administration strikes on Yemen for failure to do so.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 12:01 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
In killing terrorists, what's an acceptable ratio for terrorist to children killed? Is it acceptable to kill 2 children per terrorist? 10 children per terrorist?
Now do abortion.
Posted on 4/9/25 at 12:17 pm to PQuin
quote:
I'm curious to hear why leveling an apartment building to kill one person
Where did this happen and for what target?
quote:
is any better than the actions of Hamas or any other group
Hamas uses human shields...And their stated intent is to wipe a specific race off the map. See the difference?
quote:
Can anyone argue that this shows more regard for human life than the actions of Hamas or other terrorist groups?
I just did.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News