PQuin

quote:

---

If you are trying to make sense of either Liberal Jews or Jihadist Muslims, you are on the cold end of the trail.

---

The difference is that a US politician’s career is over if they ever decided to criticize Israel.

I guarantee that the posters laughing this off as conspiracy didn’t bother to watch the interview or the Bravo 7 film

quote:

---

Damn, the bots said he does whatever Israel says.

---

Are you lost? This isn’t Reddit, where anyone who disagrees with you must be a bot.

This admin has been aggressive toward fighting back against “antisemitism”, so people are correct to celebrate Israel finally getting some pushback. This is also the only correct move for Trump, he knows his support would evaporate if he sent more Americans to die for Israel.

quote:

---

What did Tucker and Candace say about Israel?

---

Well Candace Owens has been criticizing Israel since October 7th. She has been exposing a lot about the blackmail operations, etc. Most here will say that she’s gone off the rails into conspiracies, but I seriously doubt that any of them have actually watched her content for themselves.

Tucker’s fatal flaw was allowing Thomas Massie and Darryl Cooper to speak, and that’s about it.

quote:

---

Are you suggesting that American citizens are being deported?

---

Not saying that has happened yet, but he is literally referring to two Americans when he gave this response.

quote:

---

He now gets to do the podcasting circuit as this perceived voice of expertise even if it isn’t formally stated in his title. Guys like Murray have forgotten more history, policy, and geopolitics than smith could ever hope to learn. Yeah he came across like a bit of a prick at times but he was on a completely different level of understanding of the topics. Especially in describing Hamas and Gaza. Eventually Smith just resorts to a bunch of “like” and emo responses.

---

If Murray has so much knowledge and expertise, why didn’t he use this opportunity to expose Dave Smith for being a podcast bro? That should be easy for someone so esteemed as the great neocon Douglas Murray. Instead, he refused to discuss any of the topics he was there to debate.

What are Murray’s credentials other than his English degree that has nothing to do with this? It’s surprising to see all of you deferring to the “experts” who have lied to us about literally everything for the last decade.

quote:

---

Someone asked. But yeah, I'm much more likely to listen to a guy with an Oxford degree than I am a comedian (who has probably gathered most of his info from podcasts).

---

No they didn’t, you brought it up in a pathetic appeal to authority (just like your idol Murray did for three hours). I’m less likely to listen to the guy who was completely wrong about Syria, Iraq, Covid, and Ukraine. He also said RFK Jr. shouldn’t be allowed a platform to criticize big pharma.

But yeah, the English degree is much more important.

quote:

---

A degree from Oxford for starters. There really is something to institutions, whether you want to acknowledge it or not.

---

What does an English degree have to do with geopolitics?

quote:

---

I mean to be fair, Murray kinda proved Smith doesn’t really have a ton of actual experience with any of the shite he’s basically leveled up his comedy career by being an podcasting pundit discussing. Smith is essentially a bro who reads shite online. He now gets to do the podcasting circuit as this perceived voice of expertise even if it isn’t formally stated in his title. Guys like Murray have forgotten more history, policy, and geopolitics than smith could ever hope to learn. Yeah he came across like a bit of a prick at times but he was on a completely different level of understanding of the topics. Especially in describing Hamas and Gaza. Eventually Smith just resorts to a bunch of “like” and emo responses. It was also pretty clear Rogan was running cover for his comedian buddy who was kind of in over his head in the debate.

---

Hopefully you watched the episode and will be able to answer my question. With Murray’s experience and expertise, he should have easily been able to shut down all (or even just one) of Dave’s arguments. That simply didn’t happen, so how do you explain that? He basically filibustered the first 45 mins and then proceeded to contradict himself over and over.


Murray opened with plenty of criticism of Darryl Cooper, and then admitted that he had not listened to any of his work. Then Murray’s only “win” in the entire debate was trying to discredit Dave Smith for not visiting Israel and the ME in person. So we have a neocon shaming a Jew for criticizing Israel’s government. I was actually interested in hearing what Murray had to say, and was shocked to watch him talk in circles for three hours.

quote:

---

I'm who Murray is in this conversation and you're the comedian.

---

I agree wholeheartedly