- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gretchen Whitmer getting in on the fraud. Designating metro areas rural to get funds.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:04 am
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:04 am
quote:
House Republicans on Thursday slammed Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s Department of Health and Human Services over designations for Oakland and Wayne counties that could unlock federal healthcare funding meant for rural communities.
The issue came to light in the House Appropriations Committee during a presentation from DHHS Senior Deputy Director Beth Nagel on Wednesday that depicted the metro-area counties as “partially rural,” which allows the department to distribute funds from the federal Rural Health Transformation program.
“If you Google the definition of ‘rural,’ it describes low population density, open land, and agriculture,” state Rep. Jennifer Wortz, R–Quincy, said in a statement. “Apparently, Director Elizabeth Hertel hasn’t bothered to check. Declaring Michigan’s two largest counties ‘partially rural’ so they can access funding intended for communities like mine is completely insane. It begs the question of what backroom deals were made with large urban hospitals to push this policy through.”
Rep. Cam Cavitt, R-Cheboygan, shared the same perspective, describing the designations as “an insult to rural Michigan.”
“When Lansing talks about being ‘inclusive,’ too often it means Northern communities get left behind,” he said in a statement. “For DHHS to suggest that Wayne County deserves rural funding an insult to everyone who lives North of Clare. Southeast Michigan has never seen a dollar it didn’t want to siphon off.
“Wayne County has a population of more than a million people, multiple universities, nationally recognized hospitals, and an army of grant writers,” Cavitt added. “Alcona County has about 10,000 residents and one high school. We simply can’t compete on those terms.”
Cavitt noted the program created by President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill is designed to provide healthcare relief to rural communities, with states sharing $10 billion in grants annually.
https://www.themidwesterner.news/2026/01/whitmers-mdhhs-declares-wayne-county-partially-rural-so-federal-rural-healthcare-funds-can-be-diverted-there/
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:23 am to loogaroo
Elections have consequences.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:25 am to loogaroo
And she spent all the money on…


Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:26 am to SingleMalt1973
This was the post I clicked on this thread to see.

Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:26 am to loogaroo
Bondi about to ask ChatGPT to write her a really strongly worded letter right now. Boom!
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:29 am to loogaroo
quote:
federal Rural Health Transformation program.
Never heard of this program. Did some research and found out it was part of the BBB. $50 billion total given out over 5 years.
This post was edited on 1/28/26 at 11:31 am
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:38 am to frogtown
Yeah and it's going to be important to see how they define the terms.
If you can designate an area "partial rural", the entire area, clearly, won't be rural. The statute should define what those parameters are.
If the Michigan state government is following the language of the BBB, what's the issue? Where is the fraud?
If you can designate an area "partial rural", the entire area, clearly, won't be rural. The statute should define what those parameters are.
If the Michigan state government is following the language of the BBB, what's the issue? Where is the fraud?
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:41 am to SlowFlowPro
I only read the snippet and didn't do further looking but you are right. This should be clear cut. The terms are likely defined in the bill. It either meets the terms or doesn't
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:45 am to HailToTheChiz
This sounds like state-level Republicans trying to get soundbites opposing the state-level Democrat Executive
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:49 am to loogaroo
I don’t think it’s a stretch that she would do something like this.
Popular
Back to top

5








