Started By
Message
locked post

Govt Assistance and Minimum Wage

Posted on 2/12/18 at 3:52 pm
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 3:52 pm
So posters of this board are against govt assistance. The same people have shown to be against minimum wage increase.

Question: How can you have it both ways?

If someone is being paid a wage that is not liveable, they will require assistance. If they make enough to live, they will not be eligible.

Seems to me that the modern day right-winger does love to give their tax dollars to protect the corporate world. This is due to some indoctrination that I do not understand.

First the sponsors of a right-wing radio show or news will lead you to believe that if anyone gets any raises that the company is going to go bankrupt and no one will have any jobs and that trickle down economics will help everyone. Everyone that is including the guy who makes less than a livable wage.

Second, you blame the worker for poor life choices. The problem with this logic is that if the worker did make better life choices and really all workers made better life choices in and did not want to work a minimum wage job because they were more qualified, then who would be hired to do the job? And if no one was hired to do the job because it was all beneath them then they would have to pay more money for to hire people to do those jobs.

Just going in-depth for some of you so that you finally understand how this all works
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138857 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 3:53 pm to
This is perfect insight into the mind of the left
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23867 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 3:54 pm to
I would be for government assistance and letting people work. Most of them are trapped in government assistance already. Give them a way to help themselves and not give up government assistance cold turkey.

Would be easy to phase out or reduce government assistance over a 2 or 3 year period for families and individuals.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
131322 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 3:55 pm to
Again minimum wage is what teenagers make at burger king

If you are 40 making minimum wage you have fricked up along the way
Posted by Monday
Prairieville
Member since Mar 2013
5186 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 3:57 pm to
The first job I ever held was a minimum wage job. I was a high school kid. Those jobs are not meant for providers. Do you not realize that low skill jobs are never going to pay well? Register lady at Mickey D’s Is not a career.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

Again minimum wage is what teenagers make at burger king


That is a very blanket generalization and one that is unquantifiable. In other words, you were just talking out of your arse.

quote:

you are 40 making minimum wage you have fricked up along the way



This could be true in some cases and not true in others. Some people have an IQ of 80 and some people have made some poor choices like drug addiction etc.
Either way, they deserve to pay rent.

Your point of view is one that is very corporate coddling and assumes that everyone making minimum wage lives with their parents. You also seem to forget that minimum wage is a thing that has been increasing incrementally overtime in modern history.

If you want to be up in arms about something, this is not your fight
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97682 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:00 pm to
Sorry you are still making minimum wage or receiving Govt Assistance

Must of us have grown up and gotten past that
Posted by TigerBait1971
PTC GA
Member since Oct 2014
16346 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

they deserve to pay rent.


What the frick does this mean?
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Must of us have grown up


You may have missed a grade along the way. Lol
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52841 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

lead you to believe that if anyone gets any raises that the company is going to go bankrupt and no one will have any jobs




The worker isn't "getting a raise" if the Fed Gov points a gun at the owner and demands he pay more. A worker "gets a raise" by being more productive and having the owner WANT to retain him.


quote:

you blame the worker for poor life choices


yep


quote:

The problem with this logic is that if the worker did make better life choices and really all workers made better life choices in and did not want to work a minimum wage job because they were more qualified, then who would be hired to do the job?




Employers will pay MORE when the labor market demands MORE by scarcity.

This is when those immigrants (LEGAL) come in handy, BTW.



quote:

Just going in-depth for some of you so that you finally understand how this all works




This post was edited on 2/12/18 at 4:04 pm
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Register lady at Mickey D’s Is not a career.


I know. They were making $4.25 when I was in high school. And also by your post your kind of admitting that the only Industries really affected would be fast food correct?
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

If someone is being paid a wage that is not liveable, they will require assistance.


No, that's not how real reality works, only liberal reality.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97682 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

You may have missed a grade along the way. Lol



Minimum wage worker response. Lol
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Employers will pay MORE when the labor market demands MORE by scarcity.


So what would be the difference between that and raising minimum wage?

quote:

This is when those immigrants (LEGAL) come in handy, BTW.


Well then what would Republicans do if they didn't have those? Again this is one of those situations where you can't have it both ways. Most businessmen are Republicans and are always for cutting regulations and always for cutting cost and always for f****** the American people
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59087 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

So posters of this board are against govt assistance. The same people have shown to be against minimum wage increase.

Question: How can you have it both ways?


It's not "both ways", it's the same way: go out and work your way up.

Minimum wage was never meant to be a wage people could use to live on their own, it's an entry wage for low-to-no-skill workers.

Either get proficient enough at your job to get a raise/promotion, get some form of continuing education (certifications, vo-tech, college, etc) or in an ideal world get both.

Don't want to put in the time and/or effort to make something more of yourself than mopping the floors at the IHOP? Then you get minimum wage, it's that simple.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
40962 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

So what would be the difference between that and raising minimum wage?


Yikes.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59087 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

So what would be the difference between that and raising minimum wage?


A voluntary business decision versus mandating by the government.
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
17058 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

So posters of this board are against govt assistance. 


I assure you every poster on this board isn't against govt assistance, just the current policy of govt assistance that provided zero incentive to actively find employment.

I'm sure most would get behind something like, you're required to provide so many hours of community service to receive govt assistance if unemployed.

Contrary to what you think, most non-leftists don't want people to go hungry, be homeless, etc. They simply want them to provide some type of service to society in order to receive benefits.

Which is really the hallmark of a functioning society, everybody chipping in.
This post was edited on 2/12/18 at 4:10 pm
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
45856 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

If someone is being paid a wage that is not liveable, they will require assistance.


No, they don't "require" assistance.

Your entire premise is false, therefore the rest of your argument is pointless.

Next.



Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 4:09 pm to
Oh Jeebus Christ

It's germandawg economics

Hey OP. You're asking questions that show you are too ignorant to understand the answers
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram