Started By
Message

re: GOAT actor James Woods announces he is suing DNC for censorship

Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:32 pm to
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19456 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

Woods needs a saliva test followed by a white jacket.


You could use a bunch of Exlax.
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23066 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:33 pm to
Agree to disagree.

Also, my apologies for laughing. Shouldn’t laugh at a neighbor of mine in (former) St. George.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79659 posts
Posted on 12/2/22 at 11:55 pm to
Apology accepted.
Posted by YumYum Sauce
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2010
8311 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 12:38 am to
I'll give you a thousand dollar deal.
You get it if you leave for a year

You also get it if you can prove you've had consensual sex with a humanoid.
Posted by RedCali714
Costa Mesa, California
Member since Oct 2022
2027 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 1:04 am to
His free speech, account on Twitter, and his career was stifled based on the requests of the DNC, including certain elected officials. He does arguably have standing.
Posted by RedCali714
Costa Mesa, California
Member since Oct 2022
2027 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 1:08 am to
You’re commenting when you did not even hear his interview. You don’t even know the facts but you can’t wait to defend your liberal tribe. ??
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68581 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 3:50 am to
Oh it’s the usual suspects coming in and saying they are fine with the democrat party corruption and violation of constitutional rights.

The cult is real.
This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 3:51 am
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51383 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 5:39 am to
He doesn’t need to win. He just needs discovery
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
13361 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 7:29 am to
quote:

His free speech, account on Twitter, and his career was stifled based on the requests of the DNC, including certain elected officials. He does arguably have standing.


Hank I would agree with you if he was bringing the lawsuit regarding suppression overall, but per the aforementioned, the DNC specifically asked that he be blocked. So he is right in taking the DNC to court.

Now to prove he was not harmed, they will have to argue that social media has a whole has no value, now that indeed seems like a tall order, because trillions of dollars in equity for various companies states otherwise.

And he is right to sue the DNC and not Twitter. In this case Twitter is the convenience store clerk who handed over the cash, the DNC is the one putting a gun to their head.
Posted by Tigers2010a
Member since Jul 2021
3627 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 7:58 am to
How about class action suit?
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Hank I would agree with you if he was bringing the lawsuit regarding suppression overall, but per the aforementioned, the DNC specifically asked that he be blocked. So he is right in taking the DNC to court.
I understand what you are saying, but that is a layperson’s argument. No offense.

Legally, a plaintifff cannot recover from a defendant unless the defendant owes a legal duty to the plaintiff.

What legal duty does a DNC owe to James Woods? None.

Now, some poster who understands nothing about the law is going to start asserting that I am somehow defending the DNC or that I hate America or something equally asinine.

This is simply a legal analysis of a potential claim. At this point, it just does not look to me as if James Woods has a legal leg to stand on.
This post was edited on 12/3/22 at 8:22 am
Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 8:34 am to
quote:

His free speech, account on Twitter, and his career was stifled based on the requests of the DNC, including certain elected officials. He does arguably have standing.

It's going to be interesting. Alex Jones has to pay people billions for saying he didn't believe what happened, and did nothing directly against anyone.

The colluding that is said to be done here should be worse and punishable.

Unfortunately like another said...court shop this lawsuit around to get a fair shot.
Posted by L1C4
The Ville
Member since Aug 2017
13166 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 9:28 am to
I wish him luck, but I don't think he has a case.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
76473 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I'm sure he needs the money


20 million is not enough to keep the lights on?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21748 posts
Posted on 12/3/22 at 10:33 am to
quote:

It’s been abused to the point that it no longer resembles that.


Mickey thinks that SCOTUS isn’t political, so he probably thinks that of the entire judiciary.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram