- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Georgia DA Fani Willis possesses exonerating evidence in her case against Trump
Posted on 9/2/23 at 6:44 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 9/2/23 at 6:44 pm to AggieHank86
Whether we like it or not, DAS are elected officials. So it's no surprise that some prosecutions have a political component.....been that way since the beginning.
Maybe Willis did present this evidence to the Grand Jury and the Grand Jury weighed it and determined it did not exonerate.....I mean the Grand Jury was free to issue a no bill.
Willis must turn this evidence over if she indeed has it or it's a mistrial
Maybe Willis did present this evidence to the Grand Jury and the Grand Jury weighed it and determined it did not exonerate.....I mean the Grand Jury was free to issue a no bill.
Willis must turn this evidence over if she indeed has it or it's a mistrial
0
Posted on 9/2/23 at 6:49 pm to VolcanicTiger
Any thought on the fact that even though republicans picked up a few house seats in 2020 but Trump lost the house in2018 and the senate and the White House in 2020???
I have no doubt Trump will not be convicted on every count but will be on some. The jury will decide. If the most avid cultist here was on the jury but followed the evidence and the law there are counts the cultist would vote guilty.
His bigger conviction will come in Maimi. The blowhard was doing stupid crap with those documents and daring the AG to prosecute him.
Are you so far up Trump's butt that you could not be an impartial juror???
I have no doubt Trump will not be convicted on every count but will be on some. The jury will decide. If the most avid cultist here was on the jury but followed the evidence and the law there are counts the cultist would vote guilty.
His bigger conviction will come in Maimi. The blowhard was doing stupid crap with those documents and daring the AG to prosecute him.
Are you so far up Trump's butt that you could not be an impartial juror???
This post was edited on 9/2/23 at 7:58 pm
Posted on 9/2/23 at 7:28 pm to CelticDog
quote:
there was no fraud.
Sure thing. Speaking of fraud, do you have a copy of your birth certificate?
Posted on 9/2/23 at 7:30 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
Are you so far up Trump's butt that you could not be an impartial juror???
Pussies like you are why this country is collapsing.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 6:37 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
free beer tomorrow.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 6:42 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
DAs can game the grand jury. There is ZERO obligation to present exculpatory evidence to a GJ.
Trial is a totally different story (and that prospect is usually why DAs DON'T bring cases to a GJ where there is substantial exculpatory evidence).
The DA in the Ferguson case DID present it to the GJ because he knew the case should not go to trial but did not want the political heat for not prosecuting the cop on his own. He wanted the "cover" of the GJ "no billing" the case. Plus, it was the right thing to do.
Willis doesn't care about the ramifications because she wants the indictment for herself and those directing her.
Trial is a totally different story (and that prospect is usually why DAs DON'T bring cases to a GJ where there is substantial exculpatory evidence).
The DA in the Ferguson case DID present it to the GJ because he knew the case should not go to trial but did not want the political heat for not prosecuting the cop on his own. He wanted the "cover" of the GJ "no billing" the case. Plus, it was the right thing to do.
Willis doesn't care about the ramifications because she wants the indictment for herself and those directing her.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 6:58 am to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
Your absolute lack of self awareness is disgustingly laughable.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 7:05 am to I B Freeman
quote:You are delirious with TDS.
The blowhard was doing stupid crap with those documents and daring the AG to prosecute him.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 9:50 am to jbdawgs03
@chumleedawg
Go find something to do. Those are my thoughts.
Go find something to do. Those are my thoughts.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 9:57 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
This is how you know that everything the democrats accuse Trump of, they have already done themselves.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 10:49 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
quote:
The blowhard was doing stupid crap with those documents and daring the AG to prosecute him.
You are delirious with TDS.
you now try to explain for the jury and judge cannon how the trump team signed that there were no more docs when there were really dozens, later found in his office.
lied to feds.
try. name calling is no defense.
This post was edited on 9/3/23 at 10:51 am
Posted on 9/3/23 at 11:19 am to CelticDog
quote:
you now try to explain for the jury and judge cannon how the trump team signed that there were no more docs when there were really dozens, later found in his office.
Which documents, specifically, are you referring to?
This post was edited on 9/3/23 at 11:19 am
Posted on 9/3/23 at 11:46 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I don't believe they are confident of a conviction. They just want an indi tent and trial hanging over Trump during election season.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 11:48 am to VolcanicTiger
quote:
Her choice to not provide it sure as hell makes a strong case for dismissal,
No, it doesn’t. Defense-friendly evidence is routinely withheld from grand juries.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 11:52 am to Indefatigable
quote:have you addressed these crimes of democrats? If you have not, why not?
Indefatigable
The article alleges that the donations were being made under false names, using the names of elderly out of state voters and prepaid credit cards, as a way to circumvent campaign finance laws on max individual donations. Elderly people in other states that don’t donate to candidates in their own state or local elections, but were donating to a relatively unknown candidate in a local DA race in a different state. Then when some of the supposed donors were contacted, they claimed they never donated anything to her campaign.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 11:57 am to I B Freeman
quote:have you addressed these crimes of democrats? If you have not, why not?
I B Freeman
The article alleges that the donations were being made under false names, using the names of elderly out of state voters and prepaid credit cards, as a way to circumvent campaign finance laws on max individual donations. Elderly people in other states that don’t donate to candidates in their own state or local elections, but were donating to a relatively unknown candidate in a local DA race in a different state. Then when some of the supposed donors were contacted, they claimed they never donated anything to her campaign.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 11:58 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
have you addressed these crimes of democrats? If you have not, why not?
Why would I “address” anything you just quoted?
Bizarre comment from you that has nothing to do with my post.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 11:59 am to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
The article alleges that the donations were being made under false names, using the names of elderly out of state voters and prepaid credit cards, as a way to circumvent campaign finance laws on max individual donations. Elderly people in other states that don’t donate to candidates in their own state or local elections, but were donating to a relatively unknown candidate in a local DA race in a different state. Then when some of the supposed donors were contacted, they claimed they never donated anything to her campaign.
Cool. If those things can be proven and are against the law, charge the offenders.
Posted on 9/3/23 at 12:00 pm to Indefatigable
you have been partisan frequently toward the goals she espouses
Posted on 9/3/23 at 12:01 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
you have been partisan frequently toward the goals she espouses
Cite. When have I been supportive of her actions?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News