- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gay marriage needs to be next
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:02 am to ShinerHorns
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:02 am to ShinerHorns
quote:We have a troll. No real ‘sip would say this.
Marriage is between a man and a woman. Period. Anything else is going against the Lord’s will.
0
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:02 am to LieutenantBookman
quote:
That ruling is every bit as flawed Constitutionally as Roe was and every single slippery slope thing we said would happen has happened.
yup
quote:
The more you "tolerate" the more aggressive they have to become.
yup.
quote:
Every single abhorrent, disgusting sexual practice under the sun is coming down the pipeline. They will try to legalize it, normalize it, and ultimate celebrate it.
incest, pedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia, etc
All that shite coming to an elementary school class room near you unless we start pushing the filth back into the sewer wear it belongs.
been saying.
homosexual marriage led to shite that was never talked about nor celebrated like TRANSGENDER mentally ill fruitcakes.
now we see groomers, pedos, wtf next?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:With its base ….?
if you want to overturn Loving. You tell me how popular the GOP will be with that one
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:04 am to Tigers0918
quote:
Marriage is not a religious thing
Exactly. Marriage, within this context, is purely a governmental license. Literally the paper you get is a "Marriage License".
If the government wants to discriminate against groups and deny them access to this license, then they have a burden of showing why within the concept of government and laws (not religion). Even if we lower the threshold to rational basis, nobody in this thread has given a true, rational reason (within the legal, not religious framework) to ban gay marriage.
THAT is why marriage and Ogberfell is nothing like Roe.
Also, Ogberfell is based on Loving, so if you attack Ogberfell, you have to tell me why Loving should be overturned, too.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:THIS thread only?
Obergefell has ZERO bearing upon the issues that you are whining about.quote:
Lots of emotional thinking and sky screaming in this thread.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:04 am to squid_hunt
quote:
The easy solution is to eliminate government sanctioned marriage. No one participates anymore anyway. Not the purview of government.
100% agree!
Marriage is a sacrament of the church. Standing up in front of God and family was way more important than a piece of paper.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:05 am to DellTronJon
quote:That's not the point. Same for Roe. It's the issue of who decides.
Or we could stop telling people how to live their friggin lives.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:05 am to DellTronJon
quote:I honestly don't care if two people want to live together and call it a marriage. Sham marriages exist in greater number among legally married male/female couples than in same sex marriages. But, that said, the Defense of Marriage Act was well meaning and I supported it.
Or we could stop telling people how to live their friggin lives.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Long trip. Someone should pack him a sack lunch.
Stop being so emotional and come back to the world of rationality.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:06 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You overrule Obergefell and you have to overrule Loving and who really wants to open that can of worms?
You said that last time this was brought up, it's as asinine now as it was then.
Obgerfell had nothing to do with loving no matter Kennedys stupid blathering
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:07 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Obgerfell had nothing to do with loving
Literally the same legal argument/basis.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Literally the same legal argument/basis.
Which was stupid and indefensible
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:10 am to hubertcumberdale
quote:
Who is it deviant to?
Ever read the Bible? Try it you will learn something.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:11 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:Turbeaux hates Loving and wants to delegitimize interracial marriage.
Literally the same legal argument/basis.quote:
Which was stupid and indefensible
OK
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:16 am to AggieHank86
Your posts are usually stupid but coherent.
You lost your only redeemable trait on this one.
You lost your only redeemable trait on this one.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:17 am to AU86
quote:
We are a country that condones deviant behavior.
The freedom party shite really goes out the window flips once social issues are back on the table.
“Small govenrment” means super intrusive state government.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:28 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Which was stupid and indefensible
Loving was? Do tell
Also, nobody is replying to my discussion of the actual law
quote:
Marriage, within this context, is purely a governmental license. Literally the paper you get is a "Marriage License".
If the government wants to discriminate against groups and deny them access to this license, then they have a burden of showing why within the concept of government and laws (not religion). Even if we lower the threshold to rational basis, nobody in this thread has given a true, rational reason (within the legal, not religious framework) to ban gay marriage.
What is the rational basis for accepting the unequal treatment? That's the lowest level of scrutiny and nobody in this thread has given one, yet.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:30 am to LieutenantBookman
nah dude. let adults be happy.
I support the right for a Gay couple to protect their weed farm with AR15's. It doesnt bother my life 1 bit.
My religion shouldnt dictate law.
I support the right for a Gay couple to protect their weed farm with AR15's. It doesnt bother my life 1 bit.
My religion shouldnt dictate law.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 10:31 am
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:33 am to LieutenantBookman
Most gay/bisexual people are fairly harmless. Just about all of us know gay people these days. I dont know any militant ones.
And, there's probably plenty of men that post on the Rant that have a secret profile on Grindr....
And, there's probably plenty of men that post on the Rant that have a secret profile on Grindr....
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What is the rational basis for accepting the unequal treatment?
It's an idiotic, false premise. You seem to think that morality isn't a legitimate reason for a law, yet we have plenty of laws based on moral norms. Age of consent, nudity laws; I could go on and on. Just because shallow thinkers have convinced themselves that their morality is ok to codify but that other guy's isn't doesn't mean everybody believes it.
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News